Skip to content

Use of a Custom-Made Acrylic Palatal Stent to Minimize Donor Site Morbidity After Suture-Free Epithelialized Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Use of a Custom-Made Acrylic Palatal Stent to Minimize Donor Site Morbidity After Suture-Free Epithelialized Gingival Graft Harvesting: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07501754
Enrollment
44
Registered
2026-03-30
Start date
2025-01-07
Completion date
2026-05-24
Last updated
2026-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healing, Mucogingival Defects, Pain Management

Brief summary

Epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting from the palate is associated with postoperative morbidity, including pain and bleeding, due to healing by secondary intention. The effectiveness of palatal stents in reducing donor-site morbidity, particularly in suture-free techniques, remains unclear. This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluates the effect of a custom-made acrylic palatal stent (APS) compared with no stent on postoperative outcomes following EGG harvesting. The primary outcome is postoperative pain assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include other patient-reported measures, clinician-reported healing, and exploratory assessments of tissue healing.

Detailed description

Epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting is widely used in periodontal plastic surgery but is associated with postoperative discomfort at the palatal donor site. Healing occurs by secondary intention and may result in pain, bleeding, and delayed recovery. Palatal stents have been proposed as a mechanical approach to protect the wound and reduce morbidity; however, evidence supporting their effectiveness, especially in suture-free techniques, is limited. This randomized controlled, assessor-blind, parallel-arm clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of a custom-made acrylic palatal stent (APS) on postoperative morbidity following EGG harvesting. Patients were randomly assigned to receive APS or no stent after surgery. The primary outcome is postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported measures, clinical healing parameters, and exploratory assessments of tissue healing.

Interventions

DEVICECustom-Made Acrylic Palatal Stent

A custom-made acrylic palatal stent (APS) will be fabricated prior to surgery based on an impression of the maxillary arch. The device will be thermoformed, trimmed, polished, and adjusted for proper fit and retention. Following epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting, the APS will be positioned over the palatal donor site to provide mechanical protection and stabilization of the blood clot. The stent will be worn continuously during the early healing phase according to the study protocol.

OTHERNo Palatal stent

Following epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting, no protective device will be applied to the palatal donor site. Hemostasis will be achieved through local anesthesia only, without the use of sutures, pressure, or additional hemostatic agents. Healing will occur by secondary intention

Sponsors

University of Turin, Italy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults ≥18 years of age * Patients requiring periodontal plastic surgery involving epithelialized gingival graft (EGG) harvesting from the palate * Indications including keratinized tissue augmentation, soft tissue thickness augmentation, or root coverage procedures * Adequate palatal tissue thickness to allow graft harvesting (≥2 mm) * Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) ≤20% * Ability to understand and complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires * Signed informed consent * Willingness to comply with study procedures and follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

* compromised general health contraindicating the procedures (ASA III-VI) * heavy smokers (≥ 10 cigarettes/day), * systemic diseases or medications affecting treatment outcomes, * known allergies or hypersensitivity to ibuprofen.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain at the palatal donor site7 days after surgeryPostoperative pain assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst imaginable pain. Patients will record pain daily using standardized questionnaires

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative bleedingDaily from Day 1 to Day 7, Day 14, 21, 28Patient-reported bleeding at the palatal donor site assessed using a 100-mm VAS
Postoperative swellingDaily from Day 1 to Day 7, day 14, 21, 28Patient-reported swelling assessed using a 100-mm VAS.
Analgesic consumption7 days after surgeryTotal intake of ibuprofen (mg) recorded by patients during the postoperative period.
Oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14)Baseline, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, 28 daysOral health-related quality of life assessed using the OHIP-14 questionnaire
Willingness to undergo retreatment28 days after surgeryPatient willingness to undergo a similar procedure in the future (yes/no)
Epithelialization7 and 14 days after surgeryWound epithelialization assessed using hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) test and classified as none, partial, or complete.
Clinical wound healing7, 14 daysHealing assessed from standardized photographs evaluating color match, tissue contour, and scar appearance using visual analog scales.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026