Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Comparison Between Intensified Therapy and Conversion Therapy For Advanced HCC After Failure of First-line

Efficacy and Safety Comparison Between Intensified Therapy (Plus Lenvatinib) and Conversion Therapy (Regorafenib Combined With PD-(L)1 Inhibitor) For Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Failure of First-line Bevacizumab Plus Sintilimab: A Prospective, Randomized, Two-Cohort, Phase II Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07501351
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-03-30
Start date
2026-01-05
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellulcar Carcinoma

Keywords

Bevacizumab, Sintilimab, Lenvatinib, Regorafenib, PD-1, second-line treatment

Brief summary

Although immunotherapy-based therapies (including targeted-immunotherapy or dual-immunotherapy protocols) have become the first-line standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there remains a lack of high-level evidence to guide the selection of second-line therapies following progression in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Additionally, direct comparative data are scarce for combination treatment modalities such as "continuation of the original first-line regimen with added agents" or "switching to agents with different mechanisms". To address this clinical need and explore novel second-line treatment strategies for advanced HCC, we plan to conduct an exploratory clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety comparison between intensified therapy (plus lenvatinib) and conversion therapy (regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitor) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of fFirst-line bevacizumab plus sintilimab.

Interventions

DRUGIntensified Therapy

Bevacizumab, 15mg/kg, iv drip, q3w; Sintilimab, 200mg/dose, iv drip, q3w; Lenvatinib, for weight ≤60 kg, 8 mg/d, po, qd; for weight \>60 kg, 12 mg/d, po, qd.

DRUGConversion Therapy

Regorafenib, 160mg/d, po, qd; PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab, Camrelizumab, Tislelizumab, Toripalimab, Pembrolizumab), 200mg/dose, iv drip, q3w.

Sponsors

Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on histological or clinical diagnostic criteria; 2. Classified as unresectable HCC following multidisciplinary assessment; 3. Presence of at least one tumor lesion measurable according to EASL criteria; 4. Child-Pugh liver function class A/B, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) score 0-2; 5. Disease progression confirmed by CT/MRI and evaluated according to modified RECIST (mRECIST)/RECIST v1.1 criteria after ≥2 cycles of first-line therapy with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenous infusion, once every 3 weeks) combined with sintilimab (200 mg intravenous infusion, once every 3 weeks); 6. Received ≥2 cycles of post-progression treatment with bevacizumab plus sintilimab, lenvatinib, or regorafenib combined with PD-1 inhibitors; 7. Age ≥18 and ≤75 years; 8. Capability to comprehend the study protocol and provide written informed consent; 9. Laboratory parameters: hemoglobin(Hb) ≥8.5 g/dL, white blood cell (WBC) count \>2000/mm³, platelet (PLT) count ≥75,000/mm³, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>1500/mm³, total bilirubin ≤30 μmol/L, serum albumin ≥30 g/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), serum creatinine ≤1.5 times ULN, international normalized ratio (INR) ≤1.5, prothrombin time (PT) ≤18 seconds; 10. Availability of complete baseline data, treatment records, and follow-up data (including imaging assessments, laboratory tests, and clinical documentation).

Exclusion criteria

1. Life expectancy ≤2 months; 2. Presence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, or other non-HCC malignancies; 3. Active concurrent malignancy or severe comorbid conditions; 4. First-line treatment with other anticancer therapies (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, or other interventions) concurrently; 5. Pregnancy or lactation; 6. Known hypersensitivity to study drugs; 7. Clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to enrollment; 8. Refusal to comply with study and/or follow-up procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)6 monthsOS is the length of time from the date of randomization until death from any cause.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)6 monthsPFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first objectively documented tumor progression or death due to any cause.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response Rate (ORR)6 monthsORR, as determined based on tumor response according to RECIST 1.1, is defined as the proportion of all randomized subjects whose best overall response (BOR) is either a CR or PR.
Adverse Events30 daysORR, as determined based on tumor response according to RECIST 1.1, is defined as the proportion of all randomized subjects whose best overall response (BOR) is either a CR or PR.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026