Skip to content

Remote Microphone Performance Comparison in Adults With Hearing Loss

Remote Microphone Performance Comparison in Adults With Hearing Loss

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07501312
Enrollment
19
Registered
2026-03-30
Start date
2026-03-25
Completion date
2026-04-21
Last updated
2026-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Brief summary

This study will compare far-field speech understanding in noise using a hearing aid alone, with using a hearing aid plus a Roger remote microphone. It will also compare the HA+Roger mic to two other manufacturers' hearing aids plus remote mic systems in the same condition.

Detailed description

This study will recruit 15-20 hearing impaired experienced hearing aid adult users. Participants will be fit with three sets of hearing aids (Phonak devices, plus two competitor devices) and the associated remote microphone from each manufacturer. Speech perception will be measured using the validated AZ Bio test, and will be given in both the hearing aid alone condition, as well as the hearing aid plus remote microphone condition. The participant will be seated in the center of a room approximately 7m by 5.25m with a loudspeaker approximately 3 m away, at 0 degree azimuth. Four loudspeakers will also be placed in the corners of the room. For the quiet condition, target speech will be presented from the loudspeaker in front of the participant, for the noise condition speech will be presented from the front with speech babble presented from each of the corner loudspeakers. The speech understanding score in both quiet and in noise will be measured for hearing aids alone, and hearing aids plus the appropriate compatible remote microphone.

Interventions

DEVICEPhonak

Phonak hearing aid, either used alone or with the compatible remote microphone

DEVICEDevice A

First competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone

DEVICEDevice B

Second competitor hearing aid, either used alone or with compatible remote microphone

Sponsors

Sonova AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants will be blinded as to which devices they are fitted with during the testing.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Bilateral sensorineural hearing loss * Experienced bilateral hearing aid users * Fluent in English, ability to read and write in English * Able to produce a reliable study result * Willing to comply with all study requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Limited/inconsistent/no prior use of hearing aids * Self-reported ear-related pathology(including but not limited to: otorrhea within the past 90 days, dizziness, sudden onset or worsening hearing loss within the past 90 days, otalgia) * Visible deformity of the ear * Chronic, severe tinnitus * Unilateral hearing loss * Single sided deafness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AZ Bio Sentence TestVisit 2, Day 2 of studyValidated test of speech intelligibility in which participants repeat as many words as they can from a presented list of 20 sentences. Words correct are calculated as a percent correct from the total number of words presented. Higher percentages mean better speech intelligibility.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 30, 2026