Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of Subcutaneous Testosterone Implants in Men With Symptomatic Hypogonadism

Clinical Evaluation of Subcutaneous Testosterone Implants in Men With Symptomatic Hypogonadism

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07500766
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-03-30
Start date
2026-03-01
Completion date
2027-04-01
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Male Hypogonadism, Testosterone, Testosterone Deficiency, Testosterone Replacement Therapy

Keywords

testosterone pharmacokinetics, testosterone pharmacodynamics, testosterone pellets

Brief summary

Introduction: Male hypogonadism is a clinical syndrome associated with significant consequences for health and quality of life. In Brazil, approved testosterone replacement therapy options are limited to injectable formulations and transdermal gels, which are often associated with suboptimal adherence. Subcutaneous testosterone implants, already used in the United States and recommended by international guidelines, represent a promising alternative but are not yet available in Brazil. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and quality-of-life impact of 200 mg testosterone implants manufactured in Brazil for the treatment of men with symptomatic hypogonadism. Methods: This is a prospective interventional study conducted at the Division of Urology of the Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine (FMUSP). Thirty cisgender hypogonadal men meeting strict inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled. Participants will receive subcutaneous testosterone implants totaling 800 mg and will be followed for six months. Serial blood sampling will be performed to assess hormonal levels (total and free testosterone, LH, FSH, and PSA) and metabolic parameters (lipid profile, body mass index, and waist circumference). Validated questionnaires, including the IIEF-15, ADAM, and WHOQOL-BREF, will be used to evaluate sexual function, hypogonadal symptoms, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Outcomes: The primary outcome is the ability of the implants to achieve and maintain therapeutic serum testosterone levels (450-800 ng/dL). Secondary outcomes include pharmacokinetic profile (Cmax, half-life, and mean duration), metabolic effects, changes in quality of life, and treatment adherence. Clinical Significance: This study advances the understanding of a testosterone replacement modality that may offer greater convenience for selected patients and for which data on nationally manufactured products are currently lacking. Over a six-month period, the study will investigate laboratory behavior, clinical impact, and patient satisfaction. Relevance and Impact: This is the first study of its kind conducted in Brazil, combining methodological rigor with a robust design to evaluate the safety and efficacy of domestically manufactured testosterone implants. The methodology incorporates detailed ethical and scientific criteria, ensuring high-quality data. The results may support regulatory and clinical decision-making, benefiting patients and potentially contributing to the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).

Interventions

DRUGSubcutaneous Testosterone Implants

Subcutaneous Testosterone Implants in Men With Symptomatic Hypogonadism

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Implant of four BIOS testosterone pellets of 200mg in hypogonadal man and followup with pharmacokinetics of the response

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Absence of desire for future fertility. * Two fasting total testosterone measurements ≤ 350 ng/dL obtained between 6:00 and 10:00 a.m. * A positive ADAM questionnaire result (Participants with a prior diagnosis of testosterone deficiency established at this institution who are currently receiving testosterone replacement therapy and wish to participate in the study will be eligible for inclusion after completion of an appropriate washout period of the testosterone formulation in use.)

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to complete or respond to study questionnaires. * Body mass index (BMI) \> 35 kg/m². * Untreated depression, defined as a Beck Depression Inventory score \> 20. * Personal history of cancer. * Suspicious findings on digital rectal examination or breast examination. * Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \> 4 ng/mL. * History of thrombosis. * Known thrombophilia. * Erythrocytosis. * Polycythemia. * Elevated liver enzymes (AST or ALT \> 1.5 times the upper limit of normal). * Untreated chronic disease. * Heart failure classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV. * History of cardiovascular disease within the previous 6 months. * Substance use disorder or alcohol dependence. * Use of antiandrogen medications (flutamide, bicalutamide, enzalutamide, apalutamide, spironolactone, cyproterone acetate, abiraterone, ketoconazole, dutasteride, finasteride). * Use of estrogenic medications (estradiol, conjugated estrogens, progestogens). * Use of anabolic androgenic steroids without medical indication. * Untreated hypothyroidism. * Known allergy or hypersensitivity to testosterone or any component of the implant (testosterone, stearic acid).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Testosterone 200mg implants in hypogonadal men pharmacokinetics180 daysTo evaluate the efficacy of a resorbable subcutaneous testosterone implant (200 mg), administered at a total dose of 800 mg (four 200-mg implants), in achieving and maintaining total serum testosterone concentration between 450 and 800 ng/dL in symptomatic hypogonadal men over a 180-day period

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum Plasma Testosterone ConcentrationUp to 180 daysAssessment of the maximum plasma concentration of total testosterone.
Time to Maximum Plasma Testosterone Concentration (Tmax)Up to 180 daysAssessment of the time required to reach the maximum plasma concentration of total testosterone after implantation.
Plasma Testosterone Elimination Half-Life (T½)Up to 180 daysAssessment of the elimination half-life of total testosterone in plasma following implantation.
Average Plasma Testosterone Concentration (Cavg)Up to 180 daysAssessment of the average plasma concentration of total testosterone following implantation.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time CurveUp to 180 daysAssessment of the area under the curve of plasma concentration.
To evaluate the safety profile of testosterone implants.180 daysEvaluate the incidence of complications in a clavien dindo scale
Change in Serum Luteinizing Hormone (LH) LevelsUp to 180 daysAssessment of changes in serum luteinizing hormone (LH) levels during treatment with testosterone implants.
Evaluation of sexual outcomes180 daysTo evaluate the incidence of erectile dysfunction withe the International Index of Erectile Function.
Evaluation of coagulation after testosterone implants180 daysEvaluate the plasma thromboelastography in men treated with testosterone implants.
Change in Hypogonadal Symptoms Assessed by the Androgen Deficiency in the Aging Male QuestionnaireUp to 180 daysAssessment of changes in hypogonadal symptoms using the Androgen Deficiency in the Aging Male questionnaire.
To evaluate changes in quality of life in hypogonadal patients undergoing testosterone replacement therapy with implants180 daysTo evaluate changes in quality of life in hypogonadal patients undergoing testosterone replacement therapy with implants with the World Health Organization Quality of Life - BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) assessment questionnaire score.
To evaluate the metabolic effects of testosterone implants using serum lipid profile180 daysTo evaluate the metabolic effects of testosterone implants on the serum lipid profile
To assess patient satisfaction with testosterone implant therapy.180 daysTo assess patient satisfaction with a numerical Likert scale 1 to 5
To compare patient satisfaction with testosterone implants versus other testosterone replacement therapy modalities previously used by the participants.180 daysTo compare patient satisfaction with testosterone implants versus other testosterone replacement therapy modalities previously used by the participants, with a qualitative comprehensive questionnaire and a numerical final grade from 1 to 100
Change in Serum Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) LevelsUp to 180 daysAssessment of changes in serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels during treatment with testosterone implants.
Change in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) LevelsUp to 180 daysAssessment of changes in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels during treatment with testosterone implants.
To evaluate patient regret with testosterone implant treatment180 daysEvaluate the incidence of regret in the use of testosterone implant treatment in a 1-5 Likert scale.
To evaluate the metabolic effects of testosterone implants on body mass index (BMI)180 daysTo evaluate the metabolic effects of testosterone implants on body mass index in kg/m2 (BMI)
To evaluate the metabolic effects of testosterone implants on waist circumference.180 daysTo evaluate the metabolic effects of testosterone implants on the measure of waist circumference in centimeters (cm).

Contacts

CONTACTBruno N PhD, MD
bruno.nascimento@hc.fm.usp.br+5511999686655

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026