Microcirculation, Venous Congestion, Volume Expansion
Conditions
Brief summary
The hypothesis is that fluid-responsive patients who show signs of venous congestion experience a worsening of microcirculatory status after fluid administration compared to patients without signs of venous congestion
Interventions
Signs of venous congestion and microcirculatory status will be assessed at baseline. A fluid challenge will then be performed, and microcirculation will be evaluated at the end of fluid administration and again after 30 minutes
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit * Invasive or minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring
Exclusion criteria
* Suspected or confirmed pregnancy * Inability to access the oral cavity (e.g., facial trauma, oral bleeding)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Sublingual total vessel density (TVD) | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | To compare changes in sublingual microcirculatory parameter - total vessel density (TVD) - before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Sublingual percentage of perfused vessels (PPV) | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | To compare changes in sublingual microcirculatory parameter - percentage of perfused vessels (PPV) - before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion. |
| Change in Sublingual Microcirculatory Flow Index (MFI) | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | The primary objective of the study is to compare changes in sublingual microcirculation, measured by the Microcirculatory Flow Index (MFI), before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion. |
| Change in Sublingual perfused vessel density (PVD) | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | To compare changes in sublingual microcirculatory parameters - perfused vessel density (PVD) - before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion. |
| Change in Sublingual microcirculatory heterogeneity index (MHI) | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | To compare changes in sublingual microcirculatory parameters - microcirculatory heterogeneity index (MHI) - before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion. |
| Change in Sublingual PPV in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | To compare changes in sublingual PPV before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion. |
| Change in Sublingual TVD in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | To compare changes in sublingual TVD before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion. |
| Change in Sublingual MFI in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | To compare changes in sublingual MFI before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion. |
| Change in Sublingual PVD in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | To compare changes in sublingual PVD before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion. |
| Change in Sublingual MHI in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | To compare changes in sublingual MHI before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion. |
| Association Between Venous Congestion and TVD in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | o evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion TVD at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock). |
| Association Between Venous Congestion and PVD in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | To evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion and PVD at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock). |
| Association Between Venous Congestion and MFI in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | To evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion and MFI at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock). |
| Association Between Venous Congestion and PPV in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | To evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion and PPV at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock). |
| Association Between Venous Congestion and MHI in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations | Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge | To evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion and MHI at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock). |
| Association Between Venous Congestion and TVD at Baseline | Baseline | To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and TVD at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock). |
| Association Between Venous Congestion and PVD at Baseline | Baseline | To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and PVD at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock). |
| Association Between Venous Congestion and MFI at Baseline | Baseline | To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and MFI at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock). |
| Association Between Venous Congestion and PPV at Baseline | Baseline | To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and PPV at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock). |
| Association Between Venous Congestion and MHI at Baseline | Baseline | To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and MHI at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock). |
Countries
Italy