Skip to content

Closed Versus Open Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy for Chronic Anal Fissure

Outcomes of Closed Versus Open Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy for Chronic Anal Fissure: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07496216
Acronym
LIS-CLOSED Tri
Enrollment
160
Registered
2026-03-27
Start date
2019-02-01
Completion date
2026-01-15
Last updated
2026-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Anal Fissure

Keywords

Chronic Anal Fissure, Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy, Closed Technique, Open Technique, Wound Healing

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial will compare closed versus open lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) under spinal anesthesia in patients with chronic anal fissure. The study will evaluate wound healing rates, postoperative pain, return to work, anal incontinence, and recurrence. A total of 160 patients will be randomized equally to either closed LIS or open LIS. The primary outcome will be complete wound healing at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes include pain at 24 hours measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), return to work (days), anal incontinence at 6 weeks and 1 year, and recurrence at 1 year. Multivariate analysis will identify independent predictors of non-healing.

Interventions

A bivalve anal retractor will be inserted to visualize the intersphincteric groove. A number 11 scalpel blade will be introduced into the intersphincteric groove in the left lateral position, advanced to the level of the dentate line, and then rotated medially to divide the internal anal sphincter. A dry gauze wick soaked with xylocaine gel will be placed in the anal canal for hemostasis and removed on the evening of the operation day.

A 1-2 cm curvilinear incision will be made in the intersphincteric groove in the left lateral position. The intersphincteric plane will be dissected to expose the internal anal sphincter, which will then be divided under direct vision up to the level of the dentate line. The wound will be left open to heal by secondary intention.

Sponsors

Services Hospital, Lahore
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV
Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Pakistan
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of chronic anal fissure (symptoms \> 6 weeks) * Failure of conservative medical management (dietary fiber, stool softeners, topical lignocaine, and at least 4 weeks of topical glyceryl trinitrate 0.2%) * Willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Multiple fissures * Concomitant anorectal pathology (anal fistula, abscess, significant hemorrhoids, rectal cancer) * Inflammatory bowel disease * Previous anorectal surgery * History of anoreceptive intercourse * Psychiatric disease or inability to consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients with complete wound healing6 weeksDefined as evidence of scarring at the fissure site
Anal incontinence6 weeksWexner Continence Grading Scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain score24 hoursPain score through visual analog score
Return to work in days2 weeks
Recurrence1 yearReappearance of ulcer or tear in previously healed scar

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORAwais Amjad Malik, MBBS, FCPS

Services Institute of Medical Sciences

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026