Tracheal Intubation, Videolaryngoscopy, General Anesthesia, Difficult Airway Intubation
Conditions
Keywords
tracheal intubation, videolaryngoscopy, laryngoscopy, Paediatric airway, Airway management, Randomised controlled trial
Brief summary
Tracheal intubation in paediatric patients is a high-risk procedure in which failure to achieve successful intubation on the first attempt is associated with an increased risk of complications, including hypoxaemia and airway trauma. Videolaryngoscopes have been increasingly adopted in clinical practice because they improve glottic visualisation; however, evidence of their benefit in paediatric patients remains inconsistent (1) The VIDEOKIDS trial is a large, pragmatic, international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial designed to compare videolaryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy as the initial technique for tracheal intubation in paediatric patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. The primary objective is to determine whether videolaryngoscopy increases the rate of successful intubation on the first attempt compared with direct laryngoscopy. (1) Koepp-Medina G, Lusardi AC, Di Fonzo B, et al. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for paediatric tracheal intubation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2025;135:1486-98.
Detailed description
The purpose of this prospective, international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial is to compare videolaryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy as the initial technique for tracheal intubation in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. We hypothesise that videolaryngoscopy will increase the frequency of successful intubation on the first attempt compared with direct laryngoscopy. Eligible patients aged 0 to 16 years requiring orotracheal intubation will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy for the first intubation attempt. The specific device and blade type, as well as all aspects of peri-intubation management, including patient positioning, preoxygenation, and pharmacological agents, will be determined by the attending anaesthesiologist according to local practice. The primary outcome is successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt. Secondary outcomes include time to intubation, number of intubation attempts, glottic visualisation, need for adjunct airway devices, and intubation-related complications. The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. A mixed-effects logistic regression model will be used to account for centre-level variability and prespecified clinically relevant covariates. Current evidence in paediatric populations remains inconclusive, with recent meta-analyses showing no clear improvement in first-attempt success despite better glottic visualisation with videolaryngoscopy.¹ The trial is expected to enrol approximately 5,500 patients across 15 to 20 hospitals in multiple countries, including Spain and Latin America. Recruitment is planned to begin in October 2026.
Interventions
DEVICEVideolaryngoscope
For patients assigned to the videolaryngoscope Group, the operator will use a video laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt.
DEVICEDirect Laryngoscope
For patients assigned to the laryngoscope Group, the operator will use a Macintosh laryngoscope on the first laryngoscopy attempt.
Sponsors
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Days to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Paediatric patients (age 0-16 years), * Undergoing elective or scheduled surgery under general anaesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation, * Planned tracheal intubation using either videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy as the initial technique, * Informed or general consent given, according to the relevant ethics committee statement,.
Exclusion criteria
* Known upper airway anatomical abnormalities or clinical conditions requiring a specific intubation technique (e.g., fibreoptic intubation), * Requirement for emergent tracheal intubation that does not allow adequate randomisation, * Refusal of parents or legal guardians to participate in the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of intubations with successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt | Duration of procedure of procedure (minutes) | The primary outcome is successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt, defined as placement of an endotracheal tube in the trachea following a single insertion of the laryngoscope blade into the mouth, without its removal. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Successful intubation | Duration of procedure (minutes) | Successful placement of a tube in the trachea |
| Incidence of "easy intubation" | Duration of procedure (minutes) | Easy intubation is defined as a patient with modified Cormack-Lehane I-IIa glottic view and intubation on the first attempt. |
| Number of laryngoscopy attempts | Duration of procedure (minutes) | Number of laryngoscopy attempts |
| Number of attempts to cannulate the trachea with a bougie or an endotracheal tube | Duration of procedure (minutes) | Number of attempts to cannulate the trachea with a bougie or an endotracheal tube |
| Duration of tracheal intubation | Duration of procedure (minutes) | The interval (in seconds) between the first insertion of a laryngoscope blade into the mouth and the final placement of an endotracheal tube in the trachea. |
| Reason for failure to intubate on the first attempt | Duration of procedure (minutes) | Reason for failure among those who did not meet the primary outcome (successful intubation on the first attempt): 1. Inadequate view of the larynx 2. Inability to intubate the trachea with an endotracheal tube 3. Inability to cannulate the trachea with a bougie 4. Attempt aborted due to change in patient condition (e.g., worsening hypoxemia, hypotension, bradycardia, vomiting, bleeding) 5. Technical failure of the laryngoscope (e.g., battery, light source, camera, screen) 6. Other |
| Operator-assessed difficulty of intubation | Duration of procedure (minutes) | Operator-assessed difficulty of intubation 1. without difficulty 2. mild difficulty 3. moderate difficulty 4. severe difficulty |
| Glottic view assessed using the modified Cormack-Lehane classification | Duration of procedure (minutes) | Modified Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view: I: full view of the glottis, IIa: partial view of the glottis, IIb: arytenoid or posterior part of the vocal cords just visible, III: only epiglottis visible, IV: neither glottis nor epiglottis visible Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view |
| Glottic view assessed using the percentage of glottic opening (POGO score). | Duration of procedure (minutes) | The Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) score is defined as the percentage (0% to 100%) of the glottic opening visualised during laryngoscopy, from the anterior commissure to the interarytenoid notch. A score of 0% indicates that no glottic structures are visible, whereas 100% indicates full visualisation of the glottis. |
| Need for additional airway equipment | Duration of procedure (minutes) | Airway equipment: bougie, stylet, other videolaryngoscope, others. |
| Need to change the device for intubation | Duration of procedure (minutes) | Need to replace by another device, a different angled blade, requirement for a fiberoptic bronchoscope...). |
Countries
Spain
Contacts
CONTACTManuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORManuel Taboada Muñiz
University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela
Outcome results
None listed