Skip to content

MPTA on Full Standing and Rosenberg Views in Patients Undergoing High Tibial Osteotomy

Comparing Medial Proximal Tibial Angle Measurements on Full-leg Standing Radiographs and The Rosenberg View in Patients Undergoing High Tibial Osteotomy

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07493733
Enrollment
49
Registered
2026-03-25
Start date
2026-10-01
Completion date
2028-10-01
Last updated
2026-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Medial Proximal Tibial Angle

Brief summary

-Comparison of MPTA on both Full-leg Standing and Rosenberg Radiographs .

Detailed description

The medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW-HTO) is awidely and successfully performed treatment for medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint . The primary goal of MOW-HTO is to alleviate mechanical stress onthe medial compartment of the knee joint by shifting the weight-bearing line (WBL) toward the lateral compartment . Correct alignment is essential for achieving long-term success and favorable outcomes, making accurate preoperative planning crucial. Accepted gold standard for preoperative coronal plane assessment of lower limb alignment are full-leg standing radiographs (FLSR) . Measurement variables in the coronal plane include the mechanical lateral proximal femoral angle (mLPFA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle and mechanical lateral distal tibial angle. However, alignment measurements are influenced by factors such as knee flexion, rotation, and loading conditions . Identifying these factors prior to surgery is crucial to minimizing the risk of surgical error. Posteroanterior weight-bearing radiographs taken with the knee in 45 degrees of flexion, commonly referred to as the Rosenberg view (RB), are routinely used preoperatively . This imaging technique not only facilitates the assessment of the severity of knee OA but also aids in evaluating the degree of soft tissue laxity contributing to varus alignment-a factor increasingly recognized for its clinical significance . For knowledge, one study has investigated how knee alignment parameters used for planning of HTO differ when measured using the RB . The invistegator hypothesize that the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) does not differ when measured on RB radiographs compared with FLSR. Being a widely accessible and commonly used imaging technique, if confirmed, this finding would suggest that the RB could serve as a com-plementary modality for preoperative planning for MOW-HTO.

Interventions

DEVICEX-ray

comparing of MPTA on full standing and rosenberg views

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* All patients were screened for medial compartment OA of either the left or right knee joint. * Availability of preoperative full-length standing radiograph and Rosenberg view. * Completeness of patient records . * Patient consent

Exclusion criteria

* Insufficient patient records . * Previous ligamentous surgery or osteotomies . * Known neuromuscular or metabolic disorder . * Absence of a radiographic reference ball.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) measurments in both the Rosenberg view and full-leg standing radiographic positionBaseline

Contacts

CONTACTAhmed Gadelkarem Farrag, Resident Doctor
agad6126@gmail.com+20 01009372187

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026