Skip to content

USG-Guided Shoulder Injections in Frozen Shoulder

Effectiveness of USG-Guided Shoulder Injections as an Adjunct to a Home Exercise Program in the Conservative Management of Painful Frozen Shoulder and Its Association With Pain Phenotypes

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07493213
Enrollment
68
Registered
2026-03-25
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2026-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adhesive Capsulitis, Frozen Shoulder, Neuropathic Pain, Nociplastic Pain, Shoulder Pain

Keywords

Frozen Shoulder, Adhesive Capsulitis, Shoulder Injection, Home Exercise Program, Shoulder Pain, Range of Motion, SPADI, Ultrasound-Guided Injection, pain phenotypes, exercises

Brief summary

Frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis) is characterized by pain and a progressive restriction of both active and passive shoulder range of motion, significantly impairing daily activities and quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of USG-guided shoulder injections, when added to a home-based exercise program, in the conservative management of patients with chronic, painful frozen shoulder. In this prospective randomized study, patients diagnosed with painful frozen shoulder will be included. In addition to a standardized home-based exercise program, patients will receive either USG-guided suprascapular nerve block alone or a combination of suprascapular nerve block and subacromial injection. The effects of these approaches on clinical outcomes will be assessed over a 20-week follow-up period. Primary outcome measures include pain intensity assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), functional status evaluated by the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and shoulder range of motion. Secondary outcomes include depression level (Beck Depression Inventory), sleep quality, pain phenotype (nociplastic, neuropathic, or nociceptive), hand grip strength, ultrasonographic findings ( (coracohumeral ligament thickness, subacromial bursa thickness) , and patient satisfaction (subjective impression of improvement). The results of this study are expected to provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness and additional benefits of different shoulder injection approaches when combined with home-based exercise therapy in patients with chronic frozen shoulder.

Detailed description

This study will include patients presenting to the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinics of Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital with chronic shoulder pain and restricted range of motion, who are clinically diagnosed with frozen shoulder following a comprehensive evaluation. A total of 68 consecutive patients aged 18-75 years, with shoulder pain lasting at least three months and diagnosed with frozen shoulder after appropriate differential diagnosis, who consent to participate will be enrolled. All participants will provide written informed consent for study participation. Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical examination findings will be recorded for all participants. As part of the clinical examination, patients will be evaluated for diagnosis and differential diagnosis based on the results of impingement tests, the drop arm sign, shoulder ultrasonography (e.g., presence of significant effusion, rotator cuff tear, etc.), and plain radiography. Following assessment according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients will be randomized (block randomization) to receive either USG-guided suprascapular nerve block alone or a combination of suprascapular nerve block and subacromial injection. Patients' sociodemographic data, as well as detailed clinical and examination findings and baseline outcomes, will be recorded. Patients will be informed about their condition, and modifications to activities of daily living will be recommended. Patients' pain phenotypes (nociceptive, neuropathic, nociplastic) will be categorized based on clinical history and validated questionnaires, and it will be determined which pain types derive greater benefit from these injections. As part of an individualized home-based exercise program, patients in both groups will perform range-of-motion exercises, Codman exercises, isometric strengthening, and stretching within their self-limited pain threshold. The home exercise program will be demonstrated in person by a physician or physiotherapist, and written printed materials will be provided to the patients. Exercise adherence will be assessed at the 3rd, 6th, and 20th week follow-up visits, and when necessary, patients will be contacted by telephone to support and monitor adherence to the exercise program. Patients with less than 70% adherence will be excluded from the analysis. In the first group (USG-guided suprascapular nerve block group), a suprascapular nerve block will be administered under ultrasound guidance in accordance with the literature (triamcinolone 20 mg/1 mL + 1% lidocaine 4 mL). In the second group (combination of suprascapular nerve block and subacromial injection group), patients will receive, in a similar manner under ultrasound guidance, a suprascapular nerve block (triamcinolone 10 mg/0.5 mL + 1% lidocaine 4 mL + 0.5 mL saline), followed by an ultrasound-guided subacromial/deltoid bursa injection (triamcinolone 10 mg/0.5 mL + 1% lidocaine 2.5 mL). Patients will be blinded to the type of these injections administered to them. At the 3-week follow-up after the first injection, for patients in both groups who do not show sufficient reduction in pain (defined as a decrease of less than 3 points on the VAS or less than 50% reduction) and who are willing to proceed, repeat injections will be administered in the same manner based on a joint decision between the patient and the physician. No additional treatments such as extra medications, additional injections, or manipulations will be administered to the patients. For pain relief, patients will be allowed to take paracetamol 500 mg tablets as needed (2-3 times daily). Any analgesic use due to pain will be recorded. Patients will be specifically instructed not to take any analgesics within 24 hours prior to follow-up assessments Patients will be followed to assess their pain and functional status, and primary and secondary outcome measures will be recorded at three time points: before treatment (baseline), at 6 weeks, and at 20 weeks. At these follow-up visits, a blinded assessor will evaluate the groups. Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10) for both night pain and pain with movement. Shoulder range of motion (flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation) will be measured using a goniometer. Functional status will be evaluated using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Sleep quality will be assessed using the single-item Simple Sleep Quality Scale, and mood will be evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the shoulder will be performed to measure coracohumeral ligament and subacromial bursa thickness, and the findings will be recorded. All potential adverse events will be closely monitored and documented throughout the follow-up period. Additionally, patient satisfaction (subjective impression of improvement) level will be assessed using a Likert-type questionnaire (1 = very dissatisfied, 5 = very satisfied).

Interventions

OTHERUSG-guided suprascapular nerve block

USG-guided suprascapular nerve block + home-based exercises

OTHERUSG-Guided suprascapular nerve block plus subacromial injection.

USG-Guided suprascapular nerve block plus subacromial injection + home-based exercises

Sponsors

Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

double-blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age between 18 and 75 years and willingness to participate in the study Presence of shoulder pain lasting at least 3 months and a diagnosis of primary frozen shoulder Pain intensity ≥ 4/10 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), resistant to medical treatment/analgesics Restriction of ≥30 degrees in at least two planes of shoulder motion (flexion, abduction, or external rotation) \-

Exclusion criteria

* History of shoulder trauma Presence of neurological conditions such as stroke, brachial plexus injury, Parkinson's disease, or cervical spine pathology with or without radiculopathy History of shoulder surgery, shoulder malignancy or tumor, or prior shoulder manipulation Presence of shoulder arthritis, rotator cuff tear, other shoulder injuries, or thoracic outlet syndrome Systemic diseases affecting the shoulder, severe degeneration or trauma (e.g., osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, labral or articular cartilage injuries), or inflammatory rheumatic diseases Steroid injection to the affected extremity within the last 3 months, use of oral steroids or NSAIDs, or ongoing surgical/interventional treatment Pregnancy or lactation Uncontrolled diabetes, heart failure, or uncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., liver failure, chronic kidney disease, significant endocrine disorders) Communication problems or severe psychiatric disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS pain (0-10) (night and movement)Baseline, 6 weeks, and 20 weeksVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable/unbearable pain.
Range of motion (ROM)Baseline, 6 weeks, and 20 weeksMovements of the affected shoulder (flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation) will be measured and recorded using a goniometer. The presence of limitation will be assessed by comparing it to the unaffected side.
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)Baseline, 6 weeks, and 20 weeksThe Shoulder Pain and Functionality Index (SPADI) is a self-report scale developed to assess the severity of shoulder pain and its impact on functionality. The scale consists of two sub-sections: pain (5 items) and functionality (8 items). Each item is scored from 0 (no pain or difficulty) to 10 (unbearable pain or extreme difficulty). The total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate more severe pain and loss of function.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ultrasonographic evalution (coracohumeral ligament thickness)Baseline, 6 weeks, and 20 weeksUltrasonographic evaluation of the shoulder will be performed to measure coracohumeral ligament and subacromial bursa thickness, and the findings will be recorded. With the patient in a comfortable seated position, coracohumeral ligament thickness and subacromial bursa thickness will be measured using the manual tracing function of the ultrasound device with a linear ultrasound probe, with three repeated measurements taken and the mean value recorded.
Sleep qualityBaseline, 6 weeks, and 20 weeksSleep quality during the preceding week was evaluated using the Single-Item Sleep Quality Scale (SQS), a brief and practical instrument derived from item 6 of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The scale evaluates sleep quality using a VAS ranging from 0 to 10, which is then categorized on a 0-4 scale, ranging from 0 (terrible) to 4 (excellent)."
HGSBaseline, 6 weeks, and 20 weeksAAAAA
Patient satisfaction6 weeks and 20 weeksPatient satisfaction subjective evaluation is the measurement of a patient's personal perceptions, feelings, and expectations regarding the healthcare service received, physician communication, hospital environment, and treatment outcomes, through surveys or interviews. Patient satisfaction (subjective impression of improvement) was assessed using a five-point Likert-type scale. Response options were defined as follows: 1, "no satisfaction at all"; 2, "not satisfied"; 3, neutral (no positive or negative effect); 4, "satisfied"; and 5, "very satisfied." Time Frame: 2nd week
Central Sensitization InventoryBaselineThis is a 25-item self-report scale that measures central nervous system hypersensitivity to normal stimuli (central sensitization), a condition that plays a role in the pathophysiology of chronic pain. It aids in diagnosis of chronic pain syndromes such as fibromyalgia by scoring common somatic and emotional symptoms on a scale of 0-100. Time Frame: Baseline
DN4 Neuropathic Pain QuestionnaireBaselineThis is a questionnaire that compiles symptoms and findings associated with neuropathic pain. It is scored on a scale of 0-10. A score above 4 is considered indicative of neuropathic pain.
Ultrasonographic evaluation (subacromial bursa thickness)Baseline, 6 weeks, and 20 weeksUltrasonographic evaluation of the shoulder will be performed to measure coracohumeral ligament and subacromial bursa thickness, and the findings will be recorded. With the patient in a comfortable seated position, coracohumeral ligament thickness and subacromial bursa thickness will be measured using the manual tracing function of the ultrasound device with a linear ultrasound probe, with three repeated measurements taken and the mean value recorded.
Handgrip strengthBaseline, 6 weeks, 20 weeksHandgrip strength (HGS) will be measured using Jamar® dynamometers in accordance with standard measurement techniques. Participants will be instructed to perform three maximal voluntary contractions, with a 30-60 second rest interval between trials. The mean value will be recorded and expressed in pounds (lb).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTFulya Ece URKAN, MD
ece.1608@hotmail.com+905068994339
CONTACTİsmail urkan, MD
iurkan671@outlook.com+0905074655838
STUDY_DIRECTORRamazan YILMAZ, Associate Professor (MD)

Konya Beyhekim Training and Research Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 15, 2026