Skip to content

Hands-on vs Hands-off Techniques in Perineal Protection

The Midwife's Hands Between Waiting and Support: Hands-off vs hands-on Techniques in Manual Perineal Protection.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07492940
Acronym
MPP
Enrollment
737
Registered
2026-03-25
Start date
2026-03-05
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2026-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hands-of Technique, Hands-on Technique, Manual Perineal Protection, Perineal Trauma

Keywords

Perineal trauma, Perineal injury, Perineal lacerations, Perineal tears, Obstetric anal sphincter injuries, OASIS, Genital tract trauma, Labial lacerations, Labial tears, Vaginal tears, Pelvic floor muscle injury, Levator ani muscle avulsion, First-degree perineal tear, Second-degree perineal tear, Third-degree perineal tear, Fourth-degree perineal tear, hands on, hands off, hands-on technique, hands-off technique

Brief summary

Perineal tears are frequent during vaginal delivery. This study evaluates the impact of hands-on versus hands-off techniques on perineal and neonatal outcomes to determine the most effective protective strategy.

Detailed description

Perineal trauma remains a frequent occurrence during vaginal childbirth, leading clinicians to adopt various protective strategies. The two primary approaches are the hands-on technique, characterized by active manual support of the perineum and fetal head, and the hands-off (or expectant) technique, which prioritizes spontaneous delivery without manual intervention. The objective of this study is to compare these two methods by evaluating their impact on both maternal and neonatal health. Study Endpoints The research focuses on primary outcomes related to perineal integrity-ranging from an intact perineum to varying degrees of lacerations (1st through 4th degree)-and neonatal well-being, specifically monitoring umbilical cord pH and Apgar scores (≥ 7 at 5 minutes). To ensure a comprehensive analysis, the study also accounts for several secondary variables that may influence these outcomes: Maternal & Clinical Factors: Parity, ethnicity, and the duration of the second stage of labor. Delivery Dynamics: Fetal malpositions, presentation at birth (including occiput posterior/sacral rotation), limb associations, and the transition time from head to shoulder delivery. Procedural Interventions: The specific pushing technique used, maternal positions during the expulsive phase, and the use of water (birthing pool or water birth). Supportive Measures: The application of warm compresses, the use of lubricants, and the specific assistance provided by the healthcare operator during the final contraction.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Azienda ULSS 8 Berica
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Criteri di inclusione: * Donne incinte nullipare o multipare * Gravidanza a termine * Feto nella presentazione cefalica * Consegna eutocic (spontanea) * Uso di ossitocina * Uso di analgesici Criteri di esclusione: * Parto prematuro: prematuro tardivo -Disagio fetale acuto durante la fase di espulsione- * Consegna della gretta * Distocia della spalla * Parto chirurgico (uso del vuoto ostetrico, manovra di Kristeller, taglio cesareo) --Episiotomia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perineal outcomes: intact perineum; first-, second-, third-, and fourth-degree perineal tearsWithin two hours post-delivery
Neonatal outcomes: umbilical cord pHwithin 5 minutes of delivery
Neonatal outcomes: Apgar scorewithin 5 minutes of birthApgar score ≥ 7 at 5 minutes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ParityBaseline
EthnicityBaseline
Fetal malpositions during laborThroughout the entire course of labor
Maternal positions assumed during the expulsive phaseDuring the full duration of the second stage of labor
Duration of the second stage of laborDuring the full duration of the second stage of labor
Birth with occiput in sacral rotationperiprocedural
Presence of limb associationperiprocedural
Time from head to shoulders deliveryFrom the delivery of the fetal head until the completion of birth
Birth occurring with the same contraction as the head (single contraction)From the delivery of the fetal head until the completion of birth.
Type of assistance provided (Hands-on / Hands-off)Periprocedural
Use of a birthing pool during the expulsive phase or water birthDuring active labor and the second stage
Use of lubricants during deliveryDuring the full duration of the second stage of labor
Application of warm perineal compresses during the expulsive phaseDuring the full duration of the second stage of labor
Maternal pushing technique and type of assistance provided by the operatorDuring the full duration of the second stage of labor

Countries

Italy

Contacts

CONTACTJessica Greco, dottoressa
jessica.greco@aulss8.veneto.it00390444752628
CONTACTLaura Tregnago, dottoressa
laura.tregnago@aulss8.veneto.it00390444752628
STUDY_DIRECTORJessica Greco, dottoressa

Aulss8 Berica

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLaura Tregnago, dottoressa

Aulss8 Berica

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026