Skip to content

Effects of Different Wrist Positions in Dorsal Blocking Orthoses After Flexor Tendon Repair

Effects of Different Wrist Positions in 3D-Printed Dorsal Blocking Orthoses on Clinical and Functional Outcomes After Zone I-II Flexor Tendon Repair: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07489235
Enrollment
64
Registered
2026-03-24
Start date
2026-04-20
Completion date
2028-08-06
Last updated
2026-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Flexor Tendon Injury, Tendon Injury - Hand

Keywords

flexor tendon, orthosis, splint, 3D printing, therapy, rehabilitation, immobilization

Brief summary

This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effects of three different wrist positions (30° extension, neutral, and 30° flexion) used in dorsal blocking orthoses during early active mobilization after zone I-II flexor tendon repair. A total of 54 patients will be randomly assigned into three groups. All participants will receive the same rehabilitation protocol. Clinical and functional outcomes including total active motion, pain, complications, functional status, and orthosis satisfaction will be evaluated at 6, 8, and 12 weeks by a blinded assessor.

Interventions

DEVICE3D-Printed Dorsal Blocking Orthosis (wrist 30 degree extension)

Participants will use a 3D-printed dorsal blocking orthosis with the wrist positioned at 30° extension and follow a controlled early active mobilization protocol.

DEVICE3D-Printed Dorsal Blocking Orthosis (wrist neutral)

Participants will use a 3D-printed dorsal blocking orthosis with the wrist in neutral position and follow the same rehabilitation protocol.

DEVICE3D-Printed Dorsal Blocking Orthosis (wrist 30 degree flexion)

Participants will use a 3D-printed dorsal blocking orthosis with the wrist positioned at 30° flexion and follow the same rehabilitation protocol.

Sponsors

Sedanur Güngör
Lead SponsorOTHER
Gazi University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Masking Description

Intervention model description

Model Description

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals aged 16 years and older * Patients who underwent zone I or II flexor tendon repair using at least a four--strand suture technique * Referral to physiotherapy within the first 10 days after surgery * Eligibility for a controlled early active mobilization protocol * Ability to understand and complete Turkish assessment questionnaires * Adequate cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment score \>21) * Voluntary participation with written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Thumb tendon repairs * Multiple or complex injuries (e.g., concomitant peripheral nerve injury, fractures requiring immobilization, joint dislocation, extensor tendon injury) * Active infection * Severe edema preventing orthosis use * Dermatological conditions or allergies preventing orthosis application * Systemic diseases that may affect rehabilitation (e.g., diabetes mellitus, -peripheral neuropathy, stroke, advanced rheumatoid arthritis) * Pre-existing wrist pain or deformity prior to injury * Inability to attend follow-up assessments * Non-compliance with the home exercise program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Active Motion (TAM)12 weekTotal active motion will be calculated by summing the active flexion angles of the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints and subtracting any extension deficits. Measurements will be performed using a finger goniometer and evaluated according to the Buck-Gramcko classification.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity6, 8, and 12 weeksPain intensity will be assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Hand Function6, 8 and 12 weeksHand function will be evaluated using the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, which measures the time required to complete standardized hand tasks.
Upper Extremity Function6, 8, and 12 weeksUpper extremity functional status will be assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. Lower scores indicate better function.
Grip Strength6, 8, and 12 weeksGrip strength will be measured using a hydraulic hand dynamometer and recorded in kilograms.
Pinch Strength6, 8, and 12 weeksPinch strength will be measured using a pinch meter and recorded in kilograms.
Orthosis Satisfaction6 weeksPatient satisfaction with the orthosis will be assessed using the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS).
Complicationsup to 12 weeksPostoperative complications including tendon rupture, adhesions, edema, and skin irritation will be recorded during the follow-up period.
Return to Daily ActivitiesUp to 12 weeksTime to return to daily activities and work will be recorded in weeks.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 9, 2026