Skip to content

Instrumental Soft Tissue Mobilization and Foam Rolling

The Role of Instrumental Soft Tissue Mobilization and Foam Rolling in Managing Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07487753
Acronym
IASTM
Enrollment
56
Registered
2026-03-23
Start date
2025-04-15
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2026-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plantar Fasciitis, Chronic

Keywords

Plantar Fasciitis, Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM), Foam Rolling, Pain Reduction, Functional Improvement

Brief summary

This study compares instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and foam roller therapy in individuals with plantar fasciitis. Both groups receive structured exercises. The study evaluates changes in pain, ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, and functional ability after treatment to determine which intervention is more effective for improving symptoms and physical function.

Detailed description

This randomized comparative study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and foam roller therapy in the management of plantar fasciitis. Plantar fasciitis is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by heel pain and reduced functional mobility, often associated with restricted ankle dorsiflexion and plantar fascia tightness. Participants diagnosed with plantar fasciitis were recruited from a physiotherapy outpatient department and randomly allocated into two intervention groups. Group A received instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization applied to the plantar fascia and surrounding soft tissues along with a structured exercise program. Group B received foam roller therapy targeting the plantar fascia region in addition to the same exercise protocol. Both interventions were administered over a defined treatment period under physiotherapist supervision. The study aimed to compare the effects of these interventions on pain intensity, ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, and functional disability related to plantar fasciitis. Measurements were obtained at baseline and after completion of the intervention period. The findings of this study may help identify effective physiotherapy interventions for improving pain and functional outcomes in individuals with plantar fasciitis.

Interventions

Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization applied to the plantar fascia and surrounding soft tissues to improve tissue mobility and reduce pain.

OTHERFoam Roller Therapy

Self-myofascial release using a foam roller applied to the plantar fascia region to reduce pain and improve flexibility.

Sponsors

Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 45 years * Pain on palpation at the medial tuberosity of the calcaneus * Pain during the first steps in the morning that decreases after walking * Symptoms present for more than one month * Both male and female participants were included

Exclusion criteria

* History of foot surgery * Inflammatory rheumatic disease * Previous steroid injection * Radiculopathy affecting the lower limb

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)Pre (baseline) and Post (4 weeks)Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measured in degrees using a goniometerPre (baseline) and Post (4 weeks)Ankle range of motion will be measured in degrees using a universal goniometer.
Health-related quality of life measured using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnairePre (baseline) and Post (4 weeks)Quality of life will be assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, which evaluates physical and mental health domains. Each domain is scored separately and then transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better health status and quality of life.
Foot pain and disability measured using the Foot Function Index (FFI)Pre (baseline) and Post (4 weeks)Foot function and disability related to plantar fasciitis were measured using the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire. Each item of the Foot Function Index (FFI) is rated on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain or difficulty and 10 indicates the worst pain or extreme difficulty. Scores for the answered items in each subscale are summed and divided by the maximum possible score for that subscale, and the result is multiplied by 100 to obtain a percentage score (FFI Score = Sum of item scores / Maximum possible score × 100). The scores range from 0% to 100%, where 0% represents no pain or disability and 100% represents maximum pain and disability. Higher scores indicate greater pain, functional limitation, and disability related to foot problems. A total FFI score can be calculated by averaging the three subscale scores: Pain, Disability, and Activity Limitation.

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026