Skip to content

Ultrasound Elastography of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Study on the Characteristics of Ultrasound Elastography in the Evaluation of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07486284
Acronym
UE-CTS
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-03-20
Start date
2025-04-15
Completion date
2026-04-15
Last updated
2026-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)

Keywords

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Ultrasound Elastography

Brief summary

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve compression disorder in adults. Although electromyography (EMG) is the current gold standard for diagnosis, it is invasive, time-consuming, and may yield false-negative results. Ultrasound elastography, including shear wave elastography and strain elastography, enables non-invasive assessment of median nerve stiffness, reflecting fibrosis and edema. However, data on the combined use of elastography and microvascular imaging in CTS are still limited in Vietnam. This study aims to evaluate the value of advanced ultrasound techniques in diagnosing CTS and grading disease severity, as well as their correlation with clinical symptoms and EMG findings

Interventions

* Shear Wave Elastography (SWE): * Performed in the longitudinal plane at the carpal tunnel inlet. * A Region of Interest (ROI) of 1mm will be placed on the median nerve (excluding epineurium). * Stiffness will be measured in kilopascals (kPa). * Three measurements will be taken and averaged. * Strain Elastography (SE): * Assessed using a color map overlay (Blue/Green/Red). * Grading scale (1-4): Grade 1 (Soft/Red) to Grade 4 (Hardest/Blue).

Sponsors

Da Nang Family General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria (Case Group) * Patients \>18 years old. * Clinical suspicion of CTS with at least one sign: numbness/pain in the median nerve distribution (digits 1, 2, 3, and lateral 4), nocturnal symptoms, or positive provocative tests (Tinel, Phalen, Durkan). * Confirmed diagnosis of CTS via Electrodiagnostic studies (NCS/EMG) based on American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and AANEM criteria. Inclusion Criteria (Control Group) * Healthy volunteers with no clinical symptoms of CTS. * Normal electrodiagnostic results.

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic Accuracy of Shear Wave Elastography for Carpal Tunnel SyndromeAt baseline (data collected at the time of retinal examination during the study period from April 2025 to February 2026)Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of shear wave elastography values (kPa) for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using electrodiagnostic testing as the reference standard.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Strain Elastography (SE) for Carpal Tunnel SyndromeAt baseline (data collected at the time of retinal examination during the study period from April 2025 to February 2026)Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of strain elastography grading for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using electrodiagnostic testing as the reference standard.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area (CSA) for Carpal Tunnel SyndromeAt baseline (data collected at the time of retinal examination during the study period from April 2025 to February 2026)Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of median nerve cross-sectional area (mm²) measured at the carpal tunnel inlet for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using electrodiagnostic testing as the reference standard.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CorrelationAt baseline (data collected at the time of retinal examination during the study period from April 2025 to February 2026)Correlation coefficients (Pearson/Spearman) between ultrasound parameters (Stiffness, CSA) and: * Electrophysiological severity (DML, SCV, SNAP amplitudes). * Clinical severity (Boston scores).
Cut-off ValuesAt baseline (data collected at the time of retinal examination during the study period from April 2025 to February 2026)Optimal threshold values for SWE (kPa) and CSA (mm2) to distinguish CTS from controls and to classify severity.

Countries

Vietnam

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORNguyen Do Ngoc Linh, MD

Da Nang Family General Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026