Skip to content

Artificial Intelligence in Aortic Regurgitation

Artificial Intelligence in Aortic Regurgitation: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07486271
Enrollment
540
Registered
2026-03-20
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2028-03-31
Last updated
2026-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Regurgitation Disease

Keywords

Aortic Regurgitation, Artificial Intelligence, Echocardiography, Automated Diagnosis, Clinical Efficacy

Brief summary

This research project aims to develop and validate a tool that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to automatically detect and quantify aortic regurgitation (AR). The clinical efficacy of this tool will be established by comparing it to manual diagnostic methods in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. By leveraging deep learning (DL) techniques, the AI system will automate aortic regurgitation (AR) detection, measurement, and diagnosis, addressing challenges like variability in echocardiographic interpretations and the need for specialized expertise. It will integrate multiple echocardiographic parameters to provide accurate, standardized, and efficient AR diagnoses, reducing human error and improving consistency. This tool will enhance diagnostic precision and accessibility, improving clinical outcomes and extending advanced diagnostic capabilities to a broader range of healthcare environments, including resource-limited settings.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTAI-Assisted Group

Participants in this group will undergo aortic regurgitation assessment using an advanced artificial intelligence tool.

OTHERManual measurement group

Participants in this group will receive a traditional diagnostic assessment for aortic regurgitation, performed by trained sonographers following standard protocols.

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER
Semmelweis University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Prince Charles Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Toho University
CollaboratorOTHER
Us2.ai
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The University of New South Wales
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed AR diagnosis via TTE and Doppler imaging per guidelines. * Age ≥ 18 years. * Adequate acoustic window for AR quantification.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior cardiac transplant or implanted cardiac devices. * Poor image quality. * Pregnancy or lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Study OutcomesThis will be recorded from baseline to study completion (20 months)To compare the accuracy of the AI group and the manual group in distinguishing severe from non-severe AR, using expert cardiologists' (ASE level III or equivalent) assessments as the reference standard.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing Accuracy in Differentiating AR Severity LevelsThis will be recorded from baseline to study completion (20 months)To compare the accuracy of the AI group and the manual group in differentiating trace, mild, moderate, and severe aortic regurgitation, using cardiologists' assessments as the reference standard.
Assessing deviations in Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA)This will be recorded from baseline to study completion (20 months)The Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA) assesses the size of a valve opening that leads to backward blood flow in the heart. It is an important metric for evaluating valvular regurgitation and will be measured during echocardiography.
Assessing deviations in Vena Contracta (VC)This will be recorded from baseline to study completion (20 months)The Vena Contracta (VC) is an important measurement in echocardiography used to evaluate how severe mitral regurgitation is and will be measured during echocardiography.
Assessing deviations in Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area (PISA)This will be recorded from baseline to study completion (20 months)Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area (PISA) is a method used in echocardiography to evaluate mitral regurgitation and will be measured during echocardiography.
Assessing deviations in jet widthThis will be recorded from baseline to study completion (20 months)The jet width is a critical measurement used to assess the severity of aortic regurgitation and will be measured during echocardiography.
Assessing deviations in Regurgitant Volume (RegVol)This will be recorded from baseline to study completion (20 months)Regurgitant Volume assesses how much blood leaks back into the left atrium during mitral regurgitation and will be measured using Doppler echocardiography.
Comparing Assessment Completion TimeThe time taken for each method to reach a diagnosis will be recorded from baseline to study completion (20 months)To compare the time taken by the AI group, the manual group, and the cardiologists to complete their assessments.
Tracking 1-Year OutcomesParticipants will be followed up at 6 and 12 months to monitor outcomes, including 1-year all-cause mortality and HFH.To track 1-year all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations (HFH), comparing outcomes for patients with severe aortic regurgitation identified by the AI and manual groups, separately.

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

CONTACTXueting Wang
xueting@cuhk.edu.hk(852) 3505 3840
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAlex PW Lee, Professor

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026