Acute Pulpitis, Post Endodontic Pain
Conditions
Keywords
root canal treatment, endodontic pain, sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, normal saline, dental irrigants
Brief summary
Pain is the main reason patients visit a dentist for root canal treatment. Sometimes, patients experience pain between visits, which can make the treatment uncomfortable and stressful. This study aims to compare three commonly used root canal irrigants-sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, and normal saline-to see which one causes less pain after treatment. Patients with acute pulpitis who require root canal treatment will be randomly assigned to one of the three irrigant groups. Pain will be measured using a simple Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at specific time points after treatment. The results of this study will help dentists choose the most effective and comfortable irrigant, improving patient experience and reducing the likelihood of unscheduled visits due to pain.
Detailed description
Root canal treatment (RCT) is performed to relieve dental pain and eliminate infection within the tooth. The procedure involves mechanical cleaning and shaping of the root canal system, chemical irrigation to remove bacteria and tissue remnants, and sealing of the canals along with restoration of the coronal portion. Treatment is often done over multiple visits, with temporary fillings and medicaments placed between appointments. Post-treatment pain is common in the inter-appointment period and may be caused by factors such as leakage of irrigants beyond the apex, improper instrumentation, remaining bacteria, endodontic flare-ups, or host-related factors. Chemical irrigation is used alongside mechanical cleaning to reduce microbial load and prevent post-treatment pain. Irrigants studied: Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl): Strong antimicrobial properties, effective in dissolving pulp tissue, but can cause tissue irritation, swelling, and pain if extruded beyond the root apex. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2): Helps remove debris physically and has some antimicrobial activity, though its efficacy against bacteria is less well established. Can cause tissue irritation if misused. Normal saline: Biologically safe but lacks antimicrobial activity. This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial to compare the incidence and intensity of post-endodontic pain in patients receiving these three irrigants in a local clinical setting. Objective: To compare post-endodontic pain among patients receiving sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, and normal saline as root canal irrigants. Operational Definitions: Pain: Assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). VAS = 0 indicates no pain; VAS ≥ 1 indicates presence of pain. Acute pulpitis: Diagnosed in patients with VAS pain score ≥ 4, tooth sensitivity on percussion, and radiographic evidence of lamina dura discontinuation or apical radiolucency. Study Procedures: Patients will be screened for eligibility. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: NaOCl, H2O2, or normal saline. Standard root canal treatment will be performed by trained clinicians. Pain assessment will be recorded at predetermined time points using VAS. Data will be collected, analyzed, and compared between groups to determine which irrigant results in the least post-treatment pain.
Interventions
Sodium hypochlorite 2.5% will be used as the root canal irrigant during standard root canal treatment. The solution will be applied throughout the mechanical cleaning and shaping of the canals. Pain will be assessed post-procedure using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Hydrogen peroxide 3% will be used as the root canal irrigant during standard root canal treatment. The solution will be applied throughout the mechanical cleaning and shaping of the canals. Pain will be assessed post-procedure using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride solution) will be used as the root canal irrigant during standard root canal treatment. The solution will be applied throughout the mechanical cleaning and shaping of the canals. Pain will be assessed post-procedure using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Pain scores will be recorded by an assessor blinded to the type of irrigant used to minimize bias. The participant and care provider will not be blinded due to the nature of the intervention.
Intervention model description
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three parallel groups (sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, or normal saline) to receive standard root canal treatment. Outcomes (pain scores) will be measured at predefined time points after intervention to compare efficacy among groups.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Male or female patients aged 18-50 years. Diagnosed with acute pulpitis with pain duration ≤ 3 days. Planned to undergo root canal treatment. Willing to provide informed consent and comply with follow-up.
Exclusion criteria
Teeth presenting with fluctuant facial swelling (acute apical abscess). Teeth with difficult access opening or instrumentation (e.g., malposed teeth). Presence of vertical tooth fracture (root canal treatment contraindicated). Patients with systemic conditions contraindicating dental treatment. Patients currently taking analgesics or antibiotics that may affect pain assessment.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Post-operative pain | 72 hours after root canal treatment | Post-operative pain will be measured using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain. Pain scores will be recorded at follow-up and compared across the three irrigant groups to determine differences in post-endodontic pain intensity. |
Countries
Pakistan