Skip to content

Effectiveness of Combined Kinesiotapping and Core Stability Exercises in SIJ Dysfunction

Combined Effects of Kinesiotapping and Core Stability Exercises on Pain, Disability and Fear-avoidance Beliefs in Patients With SIJ Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07484503
Enrollment
44
Registered
2026-03-20
Start date
2026-03-26
Completion date
2026-06-10
Last updated
2026-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sacroiliac Dysfunction

Keywords

kinesiotaping, core stability exercises, fear-avoidance beliefs

Brief summary

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to determine the combined effects of kinesiotaping and core stability exercises on pain, functional disability, and fear-avoidance beliefs in female patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Detailed description

Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction (SIJD) is a recognized cause of low back pain, contributing to approximately 15-30% of cases. It results from abnormal joint mechanics, instability, or restricted motion, and often presents with persistent pain radiating to the gluteal or thigh region. Women are more predisposed due to increased joint mobility, hormonal changes, and biomechanical stress during pregnancy.

Interventions

OTHERKinesiotapping and Core Stability Exercises

Kinesiotaping Protocol: I-bands applied over bilateral SIJ (50% tension), diagonal I-bands across SIJ (75% tension). Applied weekly for 6 weeks. Core Stability Exercises: Bridging (5-10 sec hold, progressive reps) Wall squat (10 sec hold, progressive reps) Knee to chest (progressive reps) Prone arm opposite leg raises (progressive reps) Back extension (progressive reps)

OTHERCore Stability Exercises (CSE) only

Core Stability Exercises: Bridging (5-10 sec hold, progressive reps) Wall squat (10 sec hold, progressive reps) Knee to chest (progressive reps) Prone arm opposite leg raises (progressive reps) Back extension (progressive reps)

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Bilateral SIJ pain for \>3 months * Pain intensity ≥4 on NPRS * ≥3 positive SIJ provocation tests (Laslett Cluster) * Willing to participate in 6-week intervention program

Exclusion criteria

* Low back pain of other origin * Pregnancy * Recent spinal surgery * Inflammatory joint diseases (AS, RA) * Previous physiotherapy or kinesiotaping for SIJD in past 3 months * Known allergies to kinesiotape or skin conditions * History of fractures or trauma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)6th week.Description: The NPRS is a simple, quick, and widely used tool in both clinical and research settings for musculoskeletal pain conditions. It demonstrates excellent test-retest reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging from 0.79 to 0.96
Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI)6 weeksDescription: The MODI is a widely used and validated tool for assessing disability related to low back and pelvic girdle disorders. It has demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging from 0.88 to 0.97
Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)6 weeksThe FABQ assesses patient beliefs with regard to the effect of physical activity and work on their Low Back Pain. It exhibits excellent test-retest reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.82

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMaria khalid, MSOMPT

Riphah International University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 27, 2026