Skip to content

Linear vs. Circular Stapled Gastrojejunal Anastomosis in Bariatric Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery in Switzerland

Linear vs. Circular Stapled Gastrojejunal Anastomosis in Bariatric Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery in Switzerland: A Retrospective National Registry Study From 2015 to 2022.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07483957
Enrollment
21375
Registered
2026-03-19
Start date
2015-01-01
Completion date
2025-05-15
Last updated
2026-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bariatric Surgery (Gastric Bypass)

Brief summary

Bariatric surgery has become one of the preferred options in treatment of severe obesity and its comorbidities in the Western world. In Switzerland, the approximate 5000 annual bariatric operations are performed exclusively in centres certified by the "Swiss Society of Study of Morbid Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (SMOB)". Among the different bariatric surgical procedures, the laparoscopic gastric bypass remains one of the most frequently performed operations. A critical step of this operation is the creation of the gastrojejunal anastomosis. This can be done using either a linear or a circular stapler. The optimal method continues to be discussed in current academic research. The linear anastomosis technique seems to be more feasible, uses smaller incisions and is therefore faster performed. The circular anastomosis technique benefits from a standardised diameter of the anastomosis with consecutive higher reproducibility. No difference in long-term weight loss have been described for these two techniques until today. The linear technique has been linked to marginal ulcers, while the circular technique has been associated with higher rates of stenosis and incisional hernia. The associations with other long-term adverse events such as internal hernias remain under discussion. However, according to several international analyses, the linear technique seems to have favourable short-term outcomes with shorter operation time and lower rates of wound complications and postoperative bleeding. Both techniques are used in Switzerland but Swiss national data on this topic is scarce. Given the high annual case volume of bariatric surgery in Switzerland and the inconsistent international evidence, a systematic comparison of these two techniques is of relevance. This retrospective registry study provides Swiss national data on short-term postoperative outcomes after elective laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from 2015 to 2022. It aims to compare the linear vs. circular gastrojejunal anastomosis in terms of postoperative short-term postoperative, reoperation rate, and length of hospital stay.

Interventions

PROCEDURELinear anastomosis

A linear stapled anastomosis was selected based on the Swiss Classification of Operations (CHOP) code 00.9A.13 or 00.9A.14.

PROCEDURECircular anastomosis

A circular stapled anastomosis was selected based on the Swiss Classification of Operations (CHOP) code 00.9A.11 or 00.9A.12.

Sponsors

Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Elective laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Exclusion criteria

* Incomplete documentation * Age under 20 years * Other hospitals than general or surgical hospitals * Omega-loop gastric bypass * Emergency admission * No stapler coded * Open access

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Overall complicationsPeriprocedural

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Individual complicationsPeriproceduralInternational Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision codes Myocardial infarction (I21, I22) I21, I22 Cardiac arrest I46 Arterial fibrillation I48 DVT and/or PE I26.0, I26.9, I80.2 Pneumonia J13-18, J85.1 Pleural effusion J90, J91 Atelectasis J98.1 Aspiration J69.0, J69.8, J95.4 Pulmonary insufficiency J95.1, J95.2, J95.3, J96 ARDS J80 Acute kidney injury N17, N19 Urinary tract infection N10, N30.0, N30.9, N39.0 Urinary retention R33 Anastomotic leakage K91.83 Gastrointestinal ulcer K25, K28 Peritonitis / abscess K65 Delayed gastric emptying K31.88 Ileus K56, K91.3 Bleeding K81.0, S36.81 Shock T81.1 Wound dehiscence T81.3 SSI T81.4, T89.02, L08.9 Intraoperative injury T81.2 Intraoperative retained foreign body T81.5, T81.6 Other complications J95.8, J95.9, K91.88, K91.9, T81.8, T81.9
ReoperationPeriproceduralA reoperation was selected based on the Swiss Classification of Operations (CHOP) code 00.99.10.
Length of hospital stayup to 4 weeksLength of hospital stay was assessed at the 50th percentile (typical postoperative course) and the 90th percentile (prolonged postoperative course).
Time trend ageBetween 2015 and 2022Time trend of annual mean age (years)
Time trend CCIBetween 2015 and 2022Time trend of annual mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)
Time trend insuranceBetween 2015 and 2022Time trend of annual percentage of private insurance
Time trend accessBetween 2015 and 2022Time trend of annual percentage of robotic access

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026