Skip to content

Comparison of Digital and Conventional Physical Therapy on Cost Effectiveness, Pain, and Disability in Adhesive Capsulitis

Comparison of Digital and Conventional Physical Therapy on Cost Effectiveness, Pain, and Disability in Adhesive Capsulitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07482111
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-03-19
Start date
2025-11-03
Completion date
2026-02-27
Last updated
2026-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adhesive Capsulitis

Keywords

Pain, Physical Therapy Modalities, Range of Motion, Articular, Shoulder joint

Brief summary

Adhesive capsulitis is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by shoulder pain, progressive stiffness, and functional limitation, significantly affecting activities of daily living and quality of life. Physical therapy plays a key role in the management of adhesive capsulitis through pain reduction, restoration of range of motion, and improvement of functional capacity. With the advancement of digital health technologies, digital physical therapy interventions such as tele-rehabilitation and app-guided exercise programs have emerged as potential alternatives to conventional in-person therapy. However, evidence comparing the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of digital physical therapy with conventional physical therapy remains limited, particularly in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of digital physical therapy and conventional physical therapy on pain intensity, functional disability, and cost-effectiveness among patients diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis. Participants will be randomly allocated to either a digital physical therapy group, receiving supervised exercise guidance and monitoring through digital platforms, or a conventional physical therapy group receiving standard in-clinic physiotherapy interventions. Pain and disability outcomes will be assessed using validated outcome measures such as the Visual Analog Scale and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated by comparing treatment-related direct and indirect costs between both groups. The findings of this study will help determine whether digital physical therapy is a clinically effective and economically viable alternative to conventional physiotherapy for managing adhesive capsulitis, potentially improving accessibility to rehabilitation services.

Interventions

OTHERDigital Physical Therapy (Tele-rehabilitation Program)

Participants allocated to this group will receive a structured tele-rehabilitation program supervised remotely by a licensed physiotherapist through video-conferencing platforms. The program will include shoulder mobility exercises, capsular stretching, strengthening exercises for the rotator cuff and scapular stabilizer muscles, and functional training to improve shoulder movement and reduce pain. Participants will attend three supervised online sessions per week for six weeks. Instruction on proper exercise technique and progression will be provided, and participants will also be encouraged to perform prescribed home exercises between sessions. Regular virtual monitoring and feedback will be provided to ensure adherence and correct performance of exercises.

Participants in this group will receive standard in-clinic physiotherapy supervised by licensed physiotherapists. The intervention will include therapeutic exercises focusing on shoulder mobility, capsular stretching, strengthening exercises for the rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers, and manual therapy techniques such as joint mobilization to improve shoulder range of motion and reduce pain. Treatment sessions will be conducted three times per week for six weeks at the physiotherapy clinic. Participants will also receive instructions for home exercises to support recovery and improve functional mobility.

Sponsors

University of Lahore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The study included male and female participants aged 35-55 years who had received a clinical diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis from an orthopedic surgeon or a physical therapist. The study accepted participants who had experienced pain for three months or longer and showed increasing difficulties with both active and passive movements, particularly during external rotation. The participants had to comprehend the DASH and NPRS questionnaires on their own and provide their responses without assistance

Exclusion criteria

* The study excluded participants who had undergone any shoulder surgery or who had experienced any traumatic incident within the past six months or had severe mental health disorders, significant cognitive impairments, systemic inflammatory or neurological conditions that affected their upper limbs, or electronic implants that would be affected by electrical treatment, and diabetes mellitus that was not under control.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity Measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale6 weeksPain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). The NPRS is an 11-point self-reported scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst imaginable pain." Participants will be asked to rate their average pain intensity over the past 24 hours related to their condition. Score Interpretation: Minimum score: 0 (no pain) Maximum score: 10 (worst imaginable pain) Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity (worse outcome).

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026