Skip to content

A Randomised Controlled Trial of ePROM-Guided Flexible Scheduling in Dermatology

A Randomised Controlled Trial of ePROM-Guided Flexible Scheduling in Dermatology

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07481019
Enrollment
250
Registered
2026-03-18
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2029-12-01
Last updated
2026-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne, Chronic Dermatological Conditions, Eczema, Psoriasis, Urticaria

Keywords

dermatology, flexible scheduling, patient initiated follow up, electronic patient-reported outcomes, ePROMs, Bayesian decision support, outpatient care, health services research, randomised controlled trial, implementation science, healthcare utilisation, appointment no-shows, value-based care

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM)-guided flexible scheduling system can improve outpatient clinic resource utilisation in patients attending dermatology outpatient clinics for routine follow-up. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the intervention reduce the number of actualised outpatient visits over 12 months compared with standard fixed scheduling? * Does the intervention group achieve higher adherence to monthly ePROM monitoring, as measured by the proportion of completed ePROM submissions?

Interventions

BEHAVIORALFlexible ePROM-guided Scheduling System

Monthly ePROM responses will feed a Bayesian decision system to determine appointment need, which will then be used to make recommendations to patients for scheduling of appointments.

BEHAVIORALelectronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs)

Monthly electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) surveys will be sent to patients' mobile devices to capture self-reported disease severity data.

Sponsors

National University Hospital, Singapore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Dermatology outpatients otherwise due for a follow-up appointment within six months. * Ability to independently navigate and complete ePROMs. * Ability to provide informed consent (including parental consent for minors).

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who require fixed or scheduled in-person visits, including those needing skin cancer surveillance, bedside procedures (e.g., liquid nitrogen therapy), surgical interventions, or routine blood tests for immunosuppressive therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of actualised outpatient visitsbaseline to week 52Difference in actualised outpatient visits (in-person + teleconsult) over 12 months (effectiveness outcome).
Proportion of completed monthly ePROMsbaseline to week 52Difference in proportion of completed monthly ePROMs (implementation outcome)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
No-show ratebaseline to week 52Number of appointments missed without prior rescheduling or cancellation
Cancelled or rescheduled appointmentsbaseline to week 52Appointments booked but cancelled or rescheduled before the actual appointment date
Urgent care or unscheduled visitsbaseline to week 52Emergency department visits or other urgent care visits related to patient's dermatological condition
Skin-specific Quality of Life Impairmentbaseline, 6 months, 12 monthsChanges in quality of life using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Minimum Score: 0 (no impact on quality of life). Maximum Score: 30 (extremely large impact on quality of life).
Clinician-assessed disease severitybaseline to week 52Clinician-assessed disease severity using body surface area and the investigator global assessment on a 0-5 NRS
Acceptability of the interventionweek 52Assessed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability
Perceived burden of engaging with the interventionbaseline, 6 months, 12 monthsResearch questionnaire assessing perceived burden of intervention use
Fidelity to the scheduling algorithmbaseline to week 52The extent to which algorithm-generated recommendations were followed, overridden, or superseded
Barriers and facilitators to implementationweek 52Explored through semi-structured qualitative interviews
Bayesian Decision-layer outputsbaseline to week 52Decision-layer outputs, including monthly posterior summaries and posterior predictive probabilities for each appointment category

Contacts

CONTACTEllie Choi, MBBS
dermatology@nuhs.edu.sg65 6908 2222
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREllie Choi, MBBS

National University Hospital, Singapore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 2, 2026