Skip to content

Erector Spinae Plane Versus Quadratus Lumborum Blocks for Pain Management After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

Comparative Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks in Managing Postoperative Pain for Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07480499
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-03-18
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2026-11-30
Last updated
2026-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Operative Analgesia

Keywords

post operative analgesia,, erector spinae plane block, Quadratus Lumborum Blocks, Abdominal Hysterectomy

Brief summary

TAH, being a large scale gynaecological operation, is a construction bound to cause serious postoperative pain to the patient in that the procedure will inevitably entail massive tissue dissection. Management of this postoperative pain is of utmost significance because poor analgesia may lead to delayed mobilization of the patient, long duration of hospitalization and also general increase in the morbidity of postoperative period. Traditionally, in these facilities, opioid analgesics are the most common and the most popular means of controlling postoperative pain. Nevertheless, the varied and pervasive use of opioids is largely constrained by its well-reported, dose-dependent systemic adverse effects. Nausea, vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression are complications that severely degrade the recovery process of the patient and reduce his or her satisfaction.

Detailed description

Patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited in the trial after getting approval from the Hospital Ethical Review Committee and REU CPSP. Demographic information such as age, height, weight, body mass index as well as the functional classification (ASA) was documented on a pre-made proforma. Patients were randomized into two groups using a computer-generated randomisation process. Group A: Received an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block at the T9-T10 level using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. Group B: Received an ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. A qualified anaesthesiologist performed each block in aseptic settings prior to surgery. Standardised general anaesthesia was administered to each patient. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to quantify pain at rest and on coughing at 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours. Patents with VAS score more than 4, were given rescue analgesia and the cumulative amount of analgesics used in the first 24 hours as well as the time of the first rescue analgesia were recorded. Patient satisfaction with pain treatment as well as adverse effects such nausea, vomiting, and hypotension were tracked for a duration of 24 hours after the surgery

Interventions

PROCEDUREErector Spinae Plane Block

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block at the T9-T10 level using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine.

Ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine.

Sponsors

Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Combined Military Hospital Muzaffarabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
35 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients aged 35-60 years. ASA physical status I or II. Elective Total Abdominal Hysterectomy under General Anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Allergy with local anesthetics. Infection in the injection site. Coagulopathy or anticoagulant use. Morbid obesity (BMI \> 35 kg/m²).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post Operative Pain24 HoursVisual Analogue Score a one-dimensional indicator of pain severity. It is made up of a horizontal line that is 10 cm (100 mm) long and has two end points marked "No Pain" (0) and "Worst Possible Pain" (10). On the line, the patient marks the point that most accurately depicts their level of discomfort at 2,4,6,18 \& 24 hours post operatively.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to first Rescue Analgesia24 HourseWhen a patient's pain score surpasses a certain threshold (e.g., VAS \> 4), additional analgesic medication is administered when the primary anaesthetic approach is unable to give sufficient pain relief and the time will be calculated in hours.
Cumulative Opioid consumption24 HoursThe total amount of opioid medicine needed by the patient over the course of the first 24 hours following surgery in order to sustain sufficient analgesia. This is frequently computed as the Morphine Equivalent Dose (mg) and standardised.
Adverse effects24 HoursUnwanted and unpleasant effects like nausea, vomiting during 24 hours post operatively
Patient Satisfaction24 HoursA conventional 5-point Likert scale that ranges from "Very Dissatisfied" to "Very Satisfied" is usually used to gauge the patient's subjective assessment of the level of pain care they got during 24 hours duration post-operatively

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

CONTACTHamid Altaf Altaf
hamidaltaf331@gmail.com+92 341 4764956

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026