Skip to content

Adapting a Telehealth Intervention for Suicide Prevention Among Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder in Tanzania

Adapting a Telehealth Intervention for Suicide Prevention Among Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder in Tanzania: IDEAS-AUD

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07475988
Acronym
IDEAS-AUD
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-03-17
Start date
2027-08-01
Completion date
2029-03-01
Last updated
2026-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Use Disorder, Suicide Prevention

Keywords

Telehealth, Nurse-delivered interventions, Stigma reduction, Care engagement, Suicide prevention, Health behavior, Alcohol use disorder, Harm reduction

Brief summary

Together, alcohol use and suicide account for approximately 4 million deaths per year, with a considerable burden on low and middle-income countries. Tanzania is among the world's most underserved nations for mental health treatment, with very little capacity to treat suicidality or alcohol use disorders. In this study, the researchers will adapt an evidence-based intervention for suicide prevention to address the unique needs of people with alcohol use disorders in Tanzania, and rigorously pilot test the intervention to assess its feasibility and acceptability in a Tanzanian emergency department.

Detailed description

Globally, alcohol use disorders (AUD) cause 3.3 million deaths each year and account for nearly 100 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Alcohol use is also one of the most prominent risk factors for death by suicide, as people with AUD have a lifetime risk of suicide more than 7 times higher than the general population. In preliminary studies at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC) in Tanzania, 7% of patients with AUD met criteria for comorbid depression, 7% were experiencing suicidal thoughts or behavior, and nearly half reported challenges in social support. Unfortunately, Tanzania is also among the most underserved nations in the world for mental health treatment, with fewer than 1 psychologist or psychiatrist per 1 million people and very little capacity to intervene for suicide risk or AUD. Given this shortage in treatment, there is a critical need for innovative, resource-efficient treatments for suicide prevention among people with AUD. In Tanzania, 91% of the population owns a cellular phone and nearly 50% use mobile internet, yet telehealth interventions have been largely unexplored, representing a major missed opportunity for delivering evidence-based interventions. By adapting an evidence-based Motivational Interviewing intervention, MI-SafeCope, the team developed IDEAS for Hope, a telehealth intervention for suicide prevention in HIV care in Tanzania. In the current grant, the researchers propose to revisit this process by adapting MI-SafeCope, with lessons learned from the HIV study, to reduce suicide risk among people with AUD who are presenting for care in the KCMC Emergency Department (ED). The resulting intervention, IDEAS-AUD, will address suicide risk with a four-pillared approach: reducing alcohol-related harm, building social support, enhancing emotional health, and addressing social determinants of health. The pillars are integrated with Motivational Interviewing-enhanced safety planning and referral for local psychiatric care as appropriate. The long-term goal is to create evidence-based, accessible, and cost-effective treatments for mental health and substance use treatment in low-resource settings. The objectives of this proposal are to: 1) adapt IDEAS-AUD for the AUD population in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania; 2) rigorously evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of IDEAS-AUD; and 3) develop the intervention package, along with a trialability evaluation, for a future implementation evaluation and clinical trial. In Aim 1 of the current study, the researchers will identify drivers of suicide risk and desired intervention characteristics to prevent suicide in the AUD population at KCMC. In Aim 2, the study team will adapt an evidence-based suicide prevention intervention to existing AUD care, guided by a community coalition. In Aim 3, the investigators will pilot test the telehealth intervention to assess its feasibility and acceptability for reducing suicide risk in the KCMC AUD population. By the end of this proposed project, the researchers will have a framework-guided, culturally- and resource-adapted, piloted protocol for IDEAS-AUD, including screening tools, programmatic, and implementation components.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALIDEAS-AUD

Telehealth-delivered counseling to reduce suicide risk among people with Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) who are presenting for care in the KCMC Emergency Department (ED).

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Tanzania
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older * screen positive for alcohol use disorder (AUDIT \>=8) * have had suicidal thinking (C-SSRS item indicating "actual thoughts of suicide") in last 30 days * clinically sober * medically stable * have the physical and cognitive capacity to provide consent and complete study procedures * able to communicate in Swahili or English

Exclusion criteria

* prisoners * decline or unable to complete informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability of intervention3 monthsAcceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). Four items scored from 1-Completely disagree to 5-Completely agree. Scores are summed for a total score of 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
Enrollment feasibility as measured by the percentage of ED patients with documented screening for study eligibilityup to 1 year
Enrollment feasibility as measured by the number of eligible participants who declined enrollmentup to 1 year
Enrollment feasibility as measured by the time needed to enroll 30 eligible participantsup to 1 year
Retention feasibility as measured by the number of participants retained for follow-upsession 2 (2 weeks), session 3 (4 weeks), and 3 months

Contacts

CONTACTBrandon Knettel, PhD
brandon.knettel@duke.edu9196601218
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBrandon Knettel, PhD

Duke University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026