Skip to content

Comparison of Bone-patellar Tendon-bone and Patellar Tendon-bone Grafts in ACL Reconstruction

Comparison of Morbidity and Functional Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone-Tendon-Bone Graft Versus Patellar Tendon Graft Without Patellar Bone Plug in Competitive Athletes

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07475351
Enrollment
110
Registered
2026-03-16
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2028-03-01
Last updated
2026-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Keywords

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION, BONE PATELLAR TENDON BONE, PATELLAR TENDON

Brief summary

The purpose of this randomized study is to compare donor site morbidity and clinical and functional outcomes of both surgery techniques (bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft versus bone-patellar tendon without patellar bone plug (PT) graft) for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in athletes. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does PT graft reduce donor site morbidity compared to the standard BPTB graft? * Does PT technique provide clinical and functional results comparable to the BPTB technique? Researchers will compare the incidence of complications and clinical and functional outcomes between the BPTB and PT grafts groups. Patients will: * Undergo ACLR surgical intervention using one of the two assigned techniques (BPTB or PT) * Follow a two-year assessment program, including visits at three, eight, 12 and 24 months after surgery.

Detailed description

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is the most prevalent type of knee ligament injury, representing approximately 50% of all reported knee injuries. This injury has a particularly high impact on most athletes due to the demands of pivoting, jumping and cutting movements required during play. In addition, its consequences include a prolonged recovery period, the risk of reinjury and complications arising from ACL insufficiency, such as knee instability, meniscal tears or osteoarthritis. Given that the primary indicator of successful treatment is the athlete's ability to return to competitive levels, surgical reconstruction of the ACL (ACLR) has become the standard treatment. However, the choice of the optimal graft for ACLR remains controversial. For many authors, bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft is considered gold-standard option due to optimal biomechanical properties and low reinjury rate. However, BPTB is usually associated with donor site morbidity, specifically related to kneeling, dysesthesia and anterior knee pain. Given the disadvantages of the BPTB graft, an ACLR based on a bone-patellar tendon graft may be a viable alternative. This technique utilizes an autograft composed of the central third of the patellar tendon and a tibial tubercle bone plug without inclusion of the patellar bone plug, called bone-patellar tendon (BPT). Previous studies have demonstrated lower rates of anterior knee pain in BPT compared to BPTB. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding objective and specific donor site morbidity assessment for both techniques. The main hipothesis of this study is that BPT has similar clinical an functional recovery compared to BPTB with lower rates of anterior knee morbidity.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBone-Patellar tendon-Bone

After an arthroscopic examination via an anterolateral viewing portal to confirm the ACL injury, two additional portals will be established: an accessory medial portal slightly above the joint line (approximately 2cm from the medial border of the patellar tendon) and a high anteromedial portal. Once associated lesions are addressed, the graft is harvested through a 6cm longitudinal midline incision. Following paratenon dissection, the patellar tendon dimensions are measured: * Minimum length: 42mm * Width-based harvesting: if the tendon width is \<30mm, a graft consisting of one-third of the total width is harvested. If the width exceeds 30mm, a 10mm wide graft is obtained. * Bone plugs: patellar and tibial bone plugs (10x20x8mm) are harvested. While the graft is prepared, anatomic tunnels are created. The graft is secured with MectaScrew (MEDACTA) interference screws. Once fixed, an extra-articular tenodesis is performed using Arnold \& Coker technique.

PROCEDUREPatellar tendon-Bone

After an arthroscopic examination via an anterolateral viewing portal to confirm the ACL injury, two additional portals will be established: an accessory medial portal slightly above the joint line (approximately 2cm from the medial border of the patellar tendon) and a high anteromedial portal. Once associated lesions are addressed, the graft is harvested through a 6cm longitudinal midline incision. Following paratenon dissection, the patellar tendon dimensions are measured: * Minimum length: 42mm * Width-based harvesting: if the tendon width is \<30mm, a graft consisting of one-third of the total width is harvested. If the width exceeds 30mm, a 10mm wide graft is obtained. * Bone plugs: a tibial bone plug (10x20x8mm) is harvested. While the graft is prepared, anatomic tunnels are created. The graft is secured with MectaScrew (MEDACTA) interference screws. Once fixed, an extra-articular tenodesis is performed using Arnold \& Coker technique.

Sponsors

Universidad de Granada
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Time for injury to surgery of less than six months. * Active athletes (federated or recreational) * Patellar tendon length \> 42mm measured by MRI. * Age between 12 and 40 years old * Genders eligible for Study: both

Exclusion criteria

* Previous surgery or history of ligamentous knee injuries. * Concomitant knee ligament injury * Major meniscal injury (more than 50% of the lateral or medial meniscus) * Chondral injury greater than Outerbridge Grade I-II

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Donor Site MorbidityAt 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryAnterior Cruciate Ligament Donor-site Morbidity Questionnaire will be used to evaluate complications at the harvest site. Scores range from 0 to 100 points, where higher scores indicates better ouctome (absence of donor-site complications).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Function and activity levelBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryLysholm-Tegner score will be used to report knee function and activity level. Scores range from 0 to 100 points, where 100 indicates a better outcome (knee function).
Subjective knee statusBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryInternational Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) will be used to assess knee signs and symptoms. Total scores range from 0 to 100 points, where a higher score indicates a better outcome (absence of symptoms and maximum functional level).
Psychological readinessBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryAnterior cruciate ligament - Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale will be used to evaluate psychological readiness of patients to return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100 points, where a higher score indicates better outcome (full psychological readiness and confidence).
Joint AwarenessBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryForgotten Joint Score (FJS) will be used to assessthe patient's ability to forget their affected joint during activities. Scores range from 0 to 100 points, where higher scores indicate a better outcome (patients "forget" the joint, representing a natural feel).
Patient-reported symptomsBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryCincinnati Knee Rating System will be used to ievaluate patient-reported symptoms. scores range from 0 to 100 points, where a higher score (100) indicates better outcome (excellent clinical result, no symptoms, and full return to sports).
Quadriceps strengthBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryIsokinetic test will be used to evaluate quadriceps peak torque and limb symmetry index. After a warm-up of 10 minutes, patients will perform 5 and 10 unilateral repetitions at 60 and 180º/s respectively, with one minute of rest between series.
Hamstrings strengthBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryIsokinetic test will be used to evaluate hamstrings peak torque and limb symmetry index. After a warm-up of 10 minutes, patients will perform 5 and 10 unilateral repetitions at 60 and 180º/s respectively, with one minute of rest between series.
Hamstring/Quadriceps ratioBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryHQ ratio will be calculated with hamstring and quadriceps peak torque from isokinetic tests.
Functional Hop Test BatteryBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryA series of four hop tests will be performed to measure dynamic stability and neuromuscular control. Distance and limb symmetry index will be registered.
Donor-site pain pressure thresholdBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryPain pressure threshold measured via digital algometry will be used at the patellar tendon.
Quadriceps thicknessBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryAn ultrasound system with a linear probe will be used to measure quadriceps thickness.
Patellar tendon morphologyBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryAn ultrasound system with a linear probe will be used to measure patellar tendon thickness and cross-sectional area.
Anteroposterior knee stabilityBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryA Lachmeter system will be used to evaluate anteroposterior knee stability
Knee stabilityBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryA KIRA system will be used to evaluate anteroposterior and rotational knee stability
HeightBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryA tallimeter will be used to register height, expressed in meters (m).
WeightBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryBioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) will be performed by using an Inbody 970 for measuring weight, expressed in kilograms (kg).
Body Mass Index (BMI)Baseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryBioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) will be performed by using an Inbody 970 for measuring BMI, expressed in kg/m\^2.
Percentage of Body FatBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryBioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) will be performed by using an Inbody 970 for measuring PBF, expressed in %.
Skeletal Muscle MassBaseline (Pre-intervention) and 3, 8, 12 and 24 months after surgeryBioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) will be performed by using an Inbody 970 for measuring SMM, expressed in kg.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

CONTACTJose M Rodriguez-Delgado
josemariard@ugr.es+34664807986
CONTACTJose Luis Martin-Alguacil
joseluismartinalguacil@hotmail.com+34666523667
STUDY_CHAIRManuel Arroyo-Morales

Universidad de Granada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026