Skip to content

Comparison of the Effects of General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia on Tissue Perfusion in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Surgery

Comparison of the Effects of Anesthesia Techniques on Tissue Perfusion in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Surgery With Tourniquet Use

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07474480
Acronym
Perf-LEX
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-03-16
Start date
2025-03-25
Completion date
2025-12-25
Last updated
2026-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

General Anesthesia, Lower Extremity Surgery, Tissue Perfusion, Tourniquet-Induced Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Brief summary

This prospective, single-center observational study compares the effects of general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia on tissue perfusion in patients undergoing lower extremity surgery with tourniquet use. Tissue oxygenation in the limb distal to the tourniquet is monitored noninvasively using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and perfusion loss is quantified using an area-under-the-curve (AUC) approach. The primary objective is to evaluate whether spinal anesthesia better preserves distal tissue oxygenation during tourniquet inflation compared with general anesthesia. Secondary objectives are to assess reperfusion response after tourniquet release using changes in NIRS values at 20 minutes relative to baseline, the presence of early hyperemia (rSO₂ overshoot), and the association between tourniquet duration and perfusion loss. Additional exploratory analyses evaluate selected metabolic and inflammatory markers, including pH, lactate, and potassium.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 to 65 years * Scheduled for elective lower extremity orthopedic surgery * ASA physical status I or II * Expected operation duration 30 to 120 minutes * Expected tourniquet duration 30 to 90 minutes * Informed about the anesthesia method and agreed to participate voluntarily * No contraindication to neuraxial block

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to participate * History of peripheral arterial disease, diabetic neuropathy, or advanced vascular insufficiency * Severe or uncontrolled systemic disease, including ASA III or higher * Coagulopathy, local infection, or contraindication to spinal anesthesia * Body mass index greater than 35 kg/m² * Pregnancy or impaired consciousness * Intraoperative hemodynamic instability or anticipated instability * Need for additional intraoperative sedative or analgesic medication * Inability to obtain adequate and reliable NIRS signal for technical reasons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage AUC Loss During Tourniquet InflationFrom tourniquet inflation to tourniquet deflation during surgeryDistal tissue oxygenation/perfusion loss measured by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) as the percentage area-under-the-curve (AUC) loss of regional tissue oxygen saturation (rSO₂) during tourniquet inflation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reperfusion Response Assessed by ΔNIRSBaseline to 20 minutes after tourniquet deflationChange in distal regional tissue oxygen saturation (rSO₂) measured by NIRS, defined as the 20th minute after tourniquet deflation minus baseline value.
Early Hyperemia (rSO₂ Overshoot)Within 5 minutes after tourniquet deflationMean Change in Regional Oxygen Saturation (rSO₂) Above Baseline After Tourniquet Deflation
Association Between Tourniquet Duration and Percentage AUC LossIntraoperative period, during tourniquet useCorrelation between tourniquet duration and percentage AUC loss in distal tissue oxygenation/perfusion.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 29, 2026