Skip to content

Optimal Surveillance Strategy After Positive FIT and Negative Colonoscopy

From Uncertainty to Evidence: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Optimal Surveillance in High-Risk Colonoscopy-Negative Individuals After Positive FIT

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07470658
Enrollment
1274
Registered
2026-03-13
Start date
2026-03-10
Completion date
2029-10-31
Last updated
2026-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Colorectal Cancer, Colo-rectal Cancer, Fecal Immunochemical Test

Brief summary

Individuals with high fecal hemoglobin concentrations detected by fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) but negative findings on high-quality colonoscopy represent a clinically challenging population. Although colonoscopy is considered the gold standard diagnostic procedure, previous studies suggest that these individuals may still have an elevated long-term risk of colorectal cancer. This randomized controlled trial aims to determine the optimal surveillance strategy for this high-risk group by comparing two approaches: repeat FIT testing after two years versus direct colonoscopy after two years.

Detailed description

In colorectal cancer screening programs based on fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), a subgroup of individuals presents with strongly positive FIT results but negative findings on subsequent high-quality colonoscopy. Despite the absence of detected adenomas or cancer, these individuals may remain at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Currently, there is no consensus guideline regarding the optimal follow-up strategy for this population. Some clinicians recommend repeat colonoscopy, while others prefer non-invasive monitoring using FIT. This pragmatic randomized controlled trial will compare two surveillance strategies: Repeat FIT testing two years after enrollment Direct colonoscopy two years after enrollment The primary objective is to compare the detection rate of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) between the two strategies. The results of this study may help establish evidence-based surveillance guidelines for this high-risk population.

Interventions

Participants will undergo direct colonoscopy two years after enrollment regardless of FIT results.

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 45-74 years * Quantitative FIT result with fecal hemoglobin ≥100 µg/g within the past two years * Negative high-quality colonoscopy following the positive FIT result * Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of colorectal cancer * Inflammatory bowel disease * Known hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome * Life expectancy less than five years * Inability or unwillingness to undergo colonoscopy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Detection rate of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN)2 yearsACN is defined as colorectal cancer or advanced adenoma (adenoma ≥10 mm, villous histology, or high-grade dysplasia).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Detection rate of any adenoma2 years
Detection rate of colorectal cancer2 years
Screening compliance rate2 years
Cost-effectiveness comparison between surveillance strategies2 years

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026