Skip to content

CLEAR-AS: CT-FFR-Guided Revascularization in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

CT-FFR-Guided Revascularization in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07469371
Acronym
CLEAR-AS
Enrollment
300
Registered
2026-03-13
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Aortic Stenosis

Brief summary

Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is often accompanied by coronary artery disease (CAD). While coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is routinely used before aortic valve replacement (AVR) to evaluate coronary anatomy, it lacks physiological assessment of myocardial ischemia. This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether integrating functional assessment using CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) with CCTA can optimize revascularization decision-making and improve clinical outcomes. A total of 300 severe AS patients scheduled for transcatheter or surgical AVR will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (revascularization decisions guided by both CCTA and CT-FFR) or the control group (decisions guided by CCTA alone). Participants will be followed up for 1 year to assess major adverse cardiovascular events and other clinical outcomes.

Detailed description

Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) frequently have concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD), which complicates pre-operative evaluation and clinical decision-making for transcatheter (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Although coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) provides excellent anatomical evaluation and has become a standard pre-AVR workflow, it is insufficient for determining the functional and hemodynamic significance of coronary lesions. CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) offers a novel, non-invasive method to evaluate the ischemic burden. The objective of this prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-controlled trial is to determine whether a "functional + anatomical" assessment strategy using CT-FFR provides incremental value over an "anatomical-only" strategy. A total of 300 eligible patients with severe AS planned for AVR will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: 1. Experimental Group (CCTA + CT-FFR): The Heart Team will formulate the revascularization strategy (e.g., concomitant or staged PCI/CABG) based on both CCTA anatomical stenosis and CT-FFR physiological data (using a threshold of CT-FFR ≤0.80 to define hemodynamically significant ischemia). 2. Active Comparator Group (CCTA alone): The Heart Team will formulate the revascularization strategy based solely on CCTA anatomical grading according to the CAD-RADS classification. All participants will be followed for 365 days post-AVR. The primary endpoint is a patient-oriented composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, including nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cardiac death, or heart failure admission), disabling stroke, clinically-driven target vessel revascularization, valve re-intervention, and life-threatening or disabling bleeding. The study hypothesizes that incorporating CT-FFR into routine pre-AVR evaluation will optimize concomitant revascularization decisions, avoid unnecessary invasive procedures, and ultimately reduce the risk of post-operative adverse events.

Interventions

OTHERCCTA plus CT-FFR-informed preoperative decision strategy

Preoperative coronary evaluation and revascularization decision-making before aortic valve replacement are based on combined CCTA anatomical assessment and CT-FFR functional assessment. When anatomical and functional assessments are concordant, both are considered in treatment planning. When anatomical and functional assessments are discordant, the CT-FFR functional result serves as the primary basis for revascularization decision-making.

OTHERCCTA-guided preoperative decision strategy

CCTA is performed as the standardized preoperative anatomic coronary assessment in patients with severe aortic stenosis scheduled for aortic valve replacement. Coronary stenosis is evaluated by 2 experienced radiologists using the 18-segment coronary model, visual diameter stenosis assessment, and CAD-RADS 2.0 classification. In the control strategy, coronary evaluation and revascularization planning are based on CCTA anatomic findings alone.

Sponsors

Yan'an Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation. Participants and treating clinicians will not be blinded because CT-FFR results are used for preoperative decision-making in the intervention arm. Unblinding will occur after completion of 1-year follow-up and database lock.

Intervention model description

Participants with severe aortic stenosis scheduled for aortic valve replacement will be randomized 1:1 to a CCTA+CT-FFR-guided preoperative decision strategy or a CCTA-only preoperative decision strategy and followed for 365 days.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \>18 years. 2. Severe aortic stenosis confirmed by echocardiography, defined as peak aortic jet velocity (Vmax) ≥4.0 m/s, mean transvalvular gradient ≥40 mmHg, or aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1.0 cm² \[or indexed aortic valve area (AVAi) ≤0.6 cm²/m²\]. 3. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II or higher. 4. Eligible for both transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). 5. Undergoing preoperative coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). 6. Willing to participate in the study and able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Allergy to prosthetic valve materials or iodinated contrast agents. 2. Contraindication or allergic reaction to anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents, or inability to tolerate required anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. 3. Active infective endocarditis or any other active infection. 4. Severe vascular disease precluding safe implantation of a prosthetic valve. 5. Ascending aortic diameter ≥50 mm. 6. Prior prosthetic valve implantation in any cardiac position or prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). 7. Preoperative imaging confirming aortic root anatomy unsuitable for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. 8. Intracardiac mass, left ventricular or left atrial thrombus, or vegetation confirmed by preoperative echocardiography. 9. Acute myocardial infarction within 30 days before surgery. 10. Clinically diagnosed stroke or transient ischemic attack within 3 months before surgery. 11. Bleeding or coagulation disorders within 3 months before surgery that required hospitalization or blood transfusion or were otherwise clinically significant and would preclude the antiplatelet therapy required in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)At 1 year (365 days) post-AVRThe primary endpoint is a cardiovascular-focused composite including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure admission, clinically-driven target vessel revascularization, or valve re-intervention). This outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants experiencing at least one of these events.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of All-Cause Mortality at 1 YearAt 1 year (365 days) post-AVRThe rate of death from any cause, including both cardiac and non-cardiac deaths. Reported as the percentage of participants.
Incidence of All-Cause Mortality at 30 DaysAt 30 days post-AVRThe rate of early death from any cause (cardiac and non-cardiac). Reported as the percentage of participants.
Incidence of Patient-Oriented Composite Endpoint at 1 YearAt 1 year (365 days) post-AVRThe composite of MACE (nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cardiac death, or heart failure admission), disabling stroke, clinically-driven target vessel revascularization, valve re-intervention, and life-threatening or disabling bleeding occurring within the early post-operative period.
Incidence of Patient-Oriented Composite Endpoint at 30 DaysAt 30 days post-AVRThe composite of MACE (nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cardiac death, or heart failure admission), disabling stroke, clinically-driven target vessel revascularization, valve re-intervention, and life-threatening or disabling bleeding occurring within the early post-operative period .

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTXirui Duan
248190836@qq.com+86 13294957739
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChengde Liao

Yan'an Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 17, 2026