Skip to content

Impact of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Patient Outcomes

The Impact of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Functional Capacity, Depression, Quality of Life, and Sleep Quality in Patients With Heart Disease: A Retrospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07468955
Enrollment
65
Registered
2026-03-13
Start date
2019-07-14
Completion date
2026-03-08
Last updated
2026-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Heart Disease

Brief summary

Objective: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on functional capacity, depressive symptoms, and the quality of life and sleep in patients with heart disease. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who participated in a structured CR program. Clinical records were reviewed to compare pre- and post-rehabilitation outcomes. Functional capacity was assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), while depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, and sleep quality were evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), respectively.

Interventions

The intervention consists of a structured, exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program. The exercise protocol was tailored to each patient's clinical status and typically included aerobic endurance training complemented by resistance training for major muscle groups. Each session lasted approximately 40-60 minutes, consisting of a 10-minute warm-up, 20-40 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity or high-intensity interval training (1:1 ratio), and a 10-minute cool-down period.

Sponsors

Kutahya Health Sciences University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease (CAD), status post-myocardial infarction (MI), stable angina, or those who have undergone cardiac surgery * Availability of complete pre- and post-rehabilitation clinical records, including 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), BDI, SF-36, and PSQI scores. * Patients classified as stable by a cardiologist prior to the initiation of the exercise program.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of severe orthopedic, neurological, or musculoskeletal disorders that prevent the performance of the 6-Minute Walk Test or exercise training. * Patients with severe cognitive impairment * Unstable angina pectoris, uncontrolled arrhythmias, or advanced heart failure (NYHA Class IV) that contraindicates aerobic exercise. * Patients who dropped out of the rehabilitation program before completion or had more than a 20% absence rate in sessions. * Patients who underwent major non-cardiac surgery within the last 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional CapacityBaseline and and post-intervention (6 week later)unctional capacity is assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The distance walked in 6 minutes is recorded in meters. An increase in distance indicates improved functional exercise capacity.
Change in Depressive SymptomBaseline and and post-intervention (6 week later)Assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The BDI is a 21-item self-report scale. Scores range from 0 to 63, where higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
Change in Quality of LifeBaseline and and post-intervention (6 week later)Assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey. It consists of 36 items covering 8 dimensions of health. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each subscale, with higher scores representing better health status.
Change in Sleep QualityBaseline and and post-intervention (6 week later)Assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI consists of 19 individual items generating 7 component scores. The global score ranges from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality (scores \>5 suggest significant sleep disturbance).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026