Skip to content

Bed Rest Duration and Outcomes in Endoscopic Skull Base Reconstruction

The Impact of Postoperative Bed Rest Duration on the Reconstruction Outcomes of Endoscopic Endonasal Midline Anterior Skull Base Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07465861
Acronym
BRO
Enrollment
316
Registered
2026-03-12
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2030-12-31
Last updated
2026-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skull Base

Keywords

Bed rest, Endoscopic surgery, Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea

Brief summary

This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted across multiple centers. Due to the anatomical and pathological complexity of endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery, the study scope was restricted to the midline anterior skull base region to maximize homogeneity among enrolled cases. After screening according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and obtaining informed consent, patients were intraoperatively classified into low-flow cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (dural defect ≤1 cm²) or high-flow CSF leak (dural defect \>1 cm²) groups. Patients in the low-flow group were randomly assigned to either a non-bed-rest group or a 2-day bed-rest group, while those in the high-flow group were randomly assigned to either a 1-day or a 3-day bed-rest group. The primary outcome was the reconstruction success rate (from immediately postoperative to 1 month) compared between different bed-rest durations within the low-flow and high-flow subgroups, respectively. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of bed-rest-related postoperative adverse events during hospitalization (safety indicator), postoperative quality-of-life scores (functional indicator), length of postoperative hospital stay (days), and total treatment cost (healthcare resource utilization indicator). By comparing these outcomes across groups, the study aims to evaluate the impact of bed-rest duration on the outcomes of endoscopic endonasal reconstruction of the midline anterior skull base, thereby providing high-quality clinical evidence to facilitate accelerated postoperative recovery.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALnon-bed-rest

for patients with low-flow cerebrospinal fluid leak (dural defect ≤1 cm²) non-bed-rest postoperatively

BEHAVIORAL2-day bed-rest

for patients with low-flow cerebrospinal fluid leak (dural defect ≤1 cm²) 2-day bed-rest postoperatively

BEHAVIORAL1-day bed-rest

for patients with high-flow CSF leak (dural defect \>1 cm²) 1-day bed-rest postoperatively

BEHAVIORAL3-day bed-rest

for patients with high-flow CSF leak (dural defect \>1 cm²) 3-day bed-rest postoperatively

Sponsors

The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female patients aged 18-75 years. 2. Scheduled to undergo endoscopic endonasal midline anterior skull-base surgery with an anticipated risk of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak. 3. Pre-operatively alert, with normal limb mobility, able to comply with both post-operative bed-rest and non-bed-rest protocols. 4. Absence of severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction or any other comorbidity that would compromise tolerance of general anesthesia or surgical intervention. 5. Good patient compliance, voluntary participation in this clinical study, and signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Pre-existing bed-rest-related complications such as hypostatic pneumonia, lower-extremity venous thrombosis, or pressure ulcers. 2. Anticipated requirement for prolonged post-operative bed rest. 3. No cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred during surgery, or dural defect extending beyond the midline anterior skull-base region. 4. Any other condition that, in the investigator's opinion, renders the participant unsuitable for enrollment. 5. Patients with poor treatment compliance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Skull base reconstruction success ratewithin 1 month postoperatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative quality-of-life scorelow-flow group: postoperative day 2; high-flow group: postoperative day 4.quality-of-life score is measured by Postoperative Recovery Scale for Adult (total score: 0-1000; higher is better)
Incidence of venous thromboembolismfrom postoperative day 1 to 14
Incidence of pulmonary infectionfrom postoperative day 1 to 14
Incidence of pressure ulcersfrom postoperative day 1 to 14
Postoperative length of stayfrom postoperative day 1 to 30stay duration in days
Postoperative treatment costfrom postoperative day 1 to 30

Contacts

CONTACTYan Jiang
jiangyanoto@qdu.edu.cn+86 13256875886
CONTACTXudong Yan
yanxudong@qdu.edu.cn+86 18661805302

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 8, 2026