Skip to content

Comparison of Diode Laser and Scalpel Frenectomy With or Without Photobiomodulation

Comparative Evaluation of Diode Laser and Scalpel Frenectomy With or Without Adjunctive Photobiomodulation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07465536
Enrollment
94
Registered
2026-03-12
Start date
2015-12-02
Completion date
2016-05-06
Last updated
2026-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frenulum; Hypertrophy, Lip

Brief summary

This randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to compare postoperative outcames of conventional scalpel frenectomy and diode laser frenectomy with or without adjunctive photobiomodulation therapy. Postoperative pain, speech difficulty, chewing difficulty, analgesic consumption, and oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14) were evaluated.

Detailed description

This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes of conventional scalpel frenectomy and diode laser frenectomy with or without adjunctive photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT). Patients presenting with an aberrant maxillary labial frenulum requiring surgical intervention were recruited and randomly allocated into study groups. Frenectomy procedures were performed either using the conventional scalpel technique or an 810-nm diode laser system. In selected groups, adjunctive photobiomodulation therapy was applied following the surgical procedure. Postoperative outcomes were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures, including visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, speech difficulty, chewing difficulty, analgesic consumption, and oral health-related quality of life measured by the OHIP-14 questionnaire. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated during the postoperative follow-up period to compare the effects of surgical technique and adjunctive photobiomodulation therapy on postoperative discomfort, functional recovery, and quality of life.

Interventions

PROCEDUREScalpel Frenectomy

Conventional frenectomy performed using a surgical scalpel for the treatment of aberrant maxillary labial frenulum.

PROCEDUREDiode Laser Frenectomy

Frenectomy performed using an 810-nm diode laser for the treatment of aberrant maxillary labial frenulum.

DEVICEPhotobiomodulation Therapy

Low-level laser therapy applied postoperatively to enhance wound healing and reduce postoperative pain and discomfort.

Sponsors

Kocaeli University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Presence of clinically diagnosed aberrant maxillary labial frenal attachment requiring surgical frenectomy * Non-smoker status * Absence of systemic disease or ongoing pharmacological therapy * Absence of active oral infection * Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or lactation * History of radiation therapy to the head and neck region * Previous frenectomy surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative PainDay 1 and Day 7 after surgeryPostoperative pain intensity assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) following frenectomy procedures.
Speech DifficultyDay 1 and Day 7 after surgerySpeech difficulty assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) following frenectomy procedures.
Chewing DifficultyDay 1 and Day 7 after surgeryChewing difficulty assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) following frenectomy procedures.
Total Analgesic ConsumptionWithin 7 days after surgeryTotal number of analgesic tablets consumed during the postoperative period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plaque Index (PI)Baseline and 2 months after surgeryPlaque accumulation assessed using the Silness and Löe Plaque Index at the maxillary central incisors.
Gingival Index (GI)Baseline and 2 months after surgeryGingival inflammation assessed using the Löe and Silness Gingival Index at the maxillary central incisors.
Probing Depth (PD)Baseline and 2 months after surgeryPeriodontal probing depth measured at the mesial, distal, buccal and palatal aspects of the maxillary central incisors using a calibrated periodontal probe.
Keratinized Tissue Width (KTW)Baseline and 2 months after surgeryWidth of keratinized gingiva measured clinically using Lugol's iodine staining and a calibrated periodontal probe.
OHIP-14Baseline, Day 1 and Day 7 after surgeryOral health-related quality of life assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026