Skip to content

Evaluation of Dora Care for Supporting Fracture Liaison Services (FLS)

A Prospective, Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Agreement, Safety, and Acceptability of 'Dora Care', an Automated AI Voice Assistant, for Supporting Clinical Pathways in a Fracture Liaison Service.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07464171
Enrollment
217
Registered
2026-03-11
Start date
2026-02-01
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

AI (Artificial Intelligence), Automation, Bone Health, Osteoporosis, Outpatient, Risk Assesment, Telemedicine

Keywords

AI (Artificial Intelligence), Fracture Liason Services, Conversational AI, Triage, Rheumatology, Telephone Consultation, Telemedicine, Bone Health, Voice AI, Medical Device

Brief summary

What is the study about? This study is testing "Dora", an AI-powered assistant that can make phone calls to patients, for use in the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS). The FLS is a clinic that helps prevent more bone fractures after an initial "fragility fracture" (a break that happens easily, usually due to osteoporosis). Why is this being done? FLS clinicians often have to spend a lot of time on routine phone calls for assessments and follow-ups. If Dora can safely and accurately collect patient information, it might save time for staff and still give patients a good experience. What will happen to patients in the study? Invitation and consent - Patients with a new fragility fracture who are eligible will be invited to take part after informed consent. Dora call - Patients will receive an automated phone call from Dora, at the start of their FLS pathway and at follow-up. At intake, Dora will ask about risk factors for bone problems (e.g., smoking, alcohol use, family fracture history). At follow-up, Dora will ask about medication use, side effects, falls, or new fractures. Clinician call - Soon after, patients will have their usual phone appointment with an FLS clinician, who asks similar questions. Surveys/interviews - Patients will be asked to complete a short questionnaire and take part in an optional interview to say how they felt about talking to Dora. What about clinicians? Clinicians involved in the FLS pathway will be asked to complete a short survey and to take part in an optional interview to understand how useful Dora's reports might be in their work. Who can take part? Patients - Age 50+, English-speaking, with a new fragility fracture, and able to use the phone. Clinicians - Those working in FLS or similar bone health services. How long will it take? Each patient might be involved for up to about 7 months. The whole study will take about a year.

Detailed description

Fragility fractures are common and are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) are internationally recognised as an effective model for secondary fracture prevention; however, FLS pathways can be resource-intensive and place a significant burden on clinical staff, particularly for standardised intake risk assessment and longer-term follow-up conversations related to medication adherence, side effects, and interval clinical events. Dora Care is a cloud-based, standalone software product that delivers automated natural-language telephone calls to patients using an AI voice assistant. Dora Care can be configured to conduct structured clinical or administrative conversations where a validated protocol exists and returns a structured summary of the interaction for healthcare teams to review. Dora Care is not intended for clinical diagnosis and, in this study, is used as an adjunct to standard Fracture Liaison Service care rather than a replacement for clinician review. This prospective, mixed-methods feasibility study evaluates whether Dora Care can support elements of the FLS pathway by assessing agreement between patient-reported information collected by Dora Care and information collected by an FLS clinician during routine care, evaluating safety when Dora Care is deployed in this context, and exploring acceptability and usability for both patients and clinicians. Study design and setting This is a prospective, single-arm feasibility study conducted in NHS hospital-based Fracture Liaison Services, initially at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, with additional potential recruitment sites. All patient participants receive a Dora Care telephone call in addition to their routine FLS telephone consultation. The study includes two linked components: Patient pathway component (live, within routine care): Patients receive an automated Dora Care call followed by their standard clinician-led FLS telephone consultation. Patient-reported questionnaires are collected after Dora Care interactions, and a subset of participants is invited to take part in qualitative interviews. Clinician usability component (simulated): Clinicians review anonymised, mock Dora Care outputs derived from the study and provide feedback via questionnaires and interviews. This component is conducted separately from live patient care to broaden clinician participation and minimise patient safety risk. Interventions and procedures Participants may contribute data at one or more routine FLS timepoints, including an intake assessment and follow-up assessments during ongoing management. Prior to the standard clinician consultation, Dora Care conducts an automated telephone call to collect patient-reported information relevant to the FLS pathway. Following the Dora Care call, patients proceed with their routine clinician-led FLS consultation, during which clinicians independently collect and document clinical information as part of standard care. Clinicians are aware that a Dora Care call has taken place but are not provided with Dora Care outputs for the purposes of agreement evaluation. Patients are invited to complete usability and satisfaction questionnaires following Dora Care interactions, and a subset of patients participates in semi-structured qualitative interviews to explore experience and acceptability. Clinicians participating in the usability component complete questionnaires and interviews based on simulated review of Dora Care outputs. Data collection and ethics Data are collected from Dora Care call outputs, routine clinician documentation within electronic health records, and participant-completed questionnaires and interviews. Data are pseudonymised and handled in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice, ISO 14155:2020, the UK Data Protection Act 2018, and UK GDPR. The study is conducted as an adjunct to standard care, and participants retain access to usual clinical support throughout. Ethical approval and relevant NHS governance approvals are obtained prior to study initiation, and device-related adverse events and device deficiencies are monitored and reported in accordance with regulatory requirements.

Interventions

DEVICEDora call

Patient participant will recieve a Dora call in addition to their standard clinical care telephone appointment

Sponsors

Ufonia
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
University College London Hospitals
CollaboratorOTHER
University of York
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Access to and ability to use a telephone for automated conversations as part of a routine, FLS phone pathway. This includes patients who are: * Adults aged ≥50 years. * Presenting with a new fragility fracture requiring FLS assessment. * Able to provide informed consent. * English speaking. * Reside in the UK.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe cognitive impairment precluding meaningful telephone interaction or informed consent. * Patients already established on long-term osteoporosis treatment. * Terminal illness with a life expectancy \<12 months. * Current participation in another clinical trial altering standard of care thus altering the care schedule.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Agreement (concordance) between Dora Care and clinician-collected data (Intake and Follow-up)Intake assessment and Follow-up assessment (planned at 16 weeks)Concordance for predefined variables collected by Dora Care versus those routinely collected by an FLS clinician during baseline care consultation (slot-level agreement; categorical variables via % agreement and Cohen's kappa; continuous variables via ICC and/or Bland-Altman).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Medication adherence rate16 week follow up where availableMedication adherence rate
Incidence of patient-reported medication side effects16 weeks and 24 weeksIncidence and type of side effects from anti-osteoporosis medications.
Incidence of new fragility fractures16 weeks and 24 weeksThe incidence of reports of new fragility fractures will be tabulated and presented as frequencies and percentages.
Incidence of patient-reported falls16 weeks and 24 weeksIncidence of falls reported by patients at follow-up, presented as frequencies and percentages.
Patient satisfaction scores with Dora Care (adapted Client Satisfaction Questionnaire)Baseline (intake assessment), 16 weeks, and 24 weeksPatient satisfaction with the Dora Care AI assistant measured using three questions adapted from the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) on a 4-point Likert scale. Scores reported as means, standard deviations, and medians.
Patient usability scores (System Usability Scale)Baseline (intake assessment), 16 weeks and 24 weeks10-item System Usability Scale (SUS) on a 5-point Likert scale, reported as means, standard deviations, medians, and ranges.
Qualitative themes from patient interviews on experience and acceptability of Dora CareThrough study completion, an average of 12 monthsThematic analysis of semi-structured interviews identifying patterns related to usability, acceptability, and perceived impact of Dora Care on the FLS patient journey.
Clinician usability scores (System Usability Scale)Through study completion, an average of 12 months10-item System Usability Scale (SUS) on a 5-point Likert scale, reported as means, standard deviations, medians, and ranges.
Clinician experience themes (qualitative interviews)Through study completion, an average of 12 monthsThematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with FLS clinicians to identify patterns related to usability, acceptability, and perceived impact of Dora Care outputs on clinical workflow and decision-making.

Contacts

CONTACTErnest Lim, MBBS, BSC
el@ufonia.com+447585554340
CONTACTEllie C Hawkins, MSc
ech@ufonia.com+447780951175
STUDY_DIRECTORAisling Higham, FRCOphth, MSc, MBBS

Ufonia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026