Skip to content

A Non-interventional Study to Evaluate the Anti-inflammatory Effects and the Clinical Efficacy of Topical Water Free Cyclosporin 0.1% Eye Drops in Patients With Dry Eye Disease and Associated Ocular Surface Inflammation Non-responding to Artificial Tears: the FOCUS Study

A Non-interventional Study to Evaluate the Anti-inflammatory Effects and the Clinical Efficacy of Topical Water Free Cyclosporin 0.1% Eye Drops in Patients With Dry Eye Disease and Associated Ocular Surface Inflammation Non-responding to Artificial Tears: the FOCUS Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07463950
Acronym
LT10460-401
Enrollment
25
Registered
2026-03-11
Start date
2026-01-20
Completion date
2026-05-04
Last updated
2026-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye Disease (DED)

Brief summary

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common, multifactorial ocular surface condition with increasing worldwide prevalence. DED induces a significant burden to the patients. Inflammatory responses involving the ocular surface including the adnexa, conjunctiva and cornea are recognized as central to its pathophysiology, as supported by in vitro, non-clinical and clinical studies. Although tear substitutes remain the mainstay of initial management, in some patients this is not sufficient to control ocular surface inflammation and associated symptoms. A new medical product (Vevizye® eye drops) has been recently approved for the treatment of DED. It contains cyclosporine 0.1% as an active ingredient and pefluorobutylpentane as vehicle. Topical cyclosporine is a well-established treatment for patients with moderate to severe DED who do not achieve sufficient clinical benefit from topical lubricants alone. Perfluorobutylpentane has been found to improve the bioavailability of cyclosporine and has a long residence time for up to 8 hours. In addition, because of its low surface tension facilitates quick and uniform spreading improving the tear film layer. The FOCUS study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of 0.1% cyclosporine eye drops solution (Vevizye®, Laboratoires THEA) in patients with moderate to severe DED characterized by ocular surface inflammation.

Interventions

DRUGVevizye® Eye Drops

Vevizye® Eye Drops, Laboratoires Thea, Clermont Ferrand, France Administration scheme: 2 times daily for 12 weeks with a 12h time interval Ingredients: Cyclosporine 1mg/mL, Perfluorobutylpentane, Ethanol, anhydrous

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * No patients with other ophthalmic diseases than DED * Chronic dry eye defined as longer than six months since diagnosis * OSDI score \> 22 * Conjunctival Hyperemia ≥ Grade 3 (Efron Scale) * Current use of tear substitutes for at least 3 months * Need to add cyclosporine eye drops to tear substitutes as judged by treating physician prior to and independently of study participation

Exclusion criteria

Ophthalmic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dryness score assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Conjunctival hyperemia grading with Photographs (Efron) scale at week 12Week 0 - Week 12Dryness score assessed by a VAS score 0-100; min 0; max 100 Unit: millimeters and Conjunctival hyperemia grading with Photographs (Efron) scale at week 12 score: 0-4; min 0, max 4

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes from baseline in conjunctival hyperemia grading with photographs (Efron) scaleAt weeks 2, 4, 8 & 12:Changes from baseline in conjunctival hyperemia grading with photographs (Efron) scale Scale 0-4; min 0; max 4
Change from baseline in dryness score (VAS)At weeks 2, 4, 8 & 12:Change from baseline in dryness score (VAS) Scale 0-100; min 0; max 100 unit: millimeter
Changes from baseline in corneal fluorescein staining according to the NEI ScaleAt weeks 2, 4, 8 & 12:Changes from baseline in corneal fluorescein staining according to the NEI Scale Scale 0-15; min 0; max 15
Changes from baseline in Tear Break Up Time (BUT) with Minims- Fluorescein Sodium 2,0%At weeks 2, 4, 8 & 12:Changes from baseline in Tear Break Up Time (BUT) with Minims- Fluorescein Sodium 2,0% Unit: seconds
Changes from baseline in lipid layer thicknessAt weeks 2, 4, 8 & 12:Changes from baseline in lipid layer thickness unit: nanometers
Changes from baseline in tear film osmolarityAt weeks 2, 4, 8 & 12:Changes from baseline in tear film osmolarity Scale \<275 - \>400; min \<275; max \>400 Unit: mOsms/L
Changes from baseline in Schirmer I test using Schirmer paper stripsAt weeks 2, 4, 8 & 12:Changes from baseline in Schirmer I test using Schirmer paper strips Scale 0-40; min 0; max 40 Unit: millimeter
Changes from baseline in conjunctival hyperemia assessment using Mc Monnies photographic scaleAt weeks 2, 4, 8 & 12Changes from baseline in conjunctival hyperemia assessment using Mc Monnies photographic scale
Changes from baseline in symptoms and quality of life using the OSDI questionnaireAt weeks 2, 4, 8 & 12:Changes from baseline in symptoms and quality of life using the OSDI questionnaire
Changes from baseline in symptoms within the last 48 hoursAt weeks 2, 4, 8 & 12Changes from baseline in symptoms within the last 48 hours
Patient satisfaction assessed by a VASAt week 12Patient satisfaction assessed by a VAS Scale 0-100; min 0; max 100 Unit: millimeter

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 9, 2026