Skip to content

Comparison of Nd Yag, Diode and Er:YAG Lasers vs Scalpel in Preprosthetic Vestibuloplasty: Vestibular Depth Gain

Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Three Dental Lasers Versusthe Conventional Scalpeltechnique in Vestibuloplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07462117
Acronym
78/30102018
Enrollment
36
Registered
2026-03-10
Start date
2018-04-30
Completion date
2024-10-20
Last updated
2026-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Edentulous; Alveolar Process, Atrophy, Edentulous Alveolar Ridge With Labial Resorption, Healthy Adult Participants

Keywords

vestibuloplasty laser, narrow vestibule

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results obtained using the conventional approach versus the modern laser method, by recording postoperative results

Detailed description

The patients were divided in 3 equal groups and the vestibuloplasty was performed by conventional surgery on the right side and by laser for the left side of the maxilla. The former served as a Control group. There were utilized three types of lasers and consequently divided the patients in three observational study groups: for Group 1, the vestibuloplasty was performed by Nd-YAG laser, for Group 2 a diode laser was utilized , while Group 3 was treated with an Er-YAG laser. An initial measurement of the vestibular depth was performed by using a millimeter markings William periodontal probe on three predetermined areas on each side: paramedian (next to the frenulum), antero-lateral (measured in the middle of the operated field), and lateral (at the most posterior place included in surgery). The measurements were performed 6 weeks postoperatively at the same levels as they were registered before surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREvestibuloplasty for Nd-YAG group

For patients treated by Nd-YAG laser, the procedure was performed under local anesthesia . The parameters for the Nd-YAG laser are: center wavelength of 1064 nm, output power of 4 W, frequency equal to 25 Hz, Micro Short Pulse (MSP) mode, sapphire fiber of 300 micrometers in diameter, power density equal to 6229 W/cm2. Conventional vestibuloplasty was applied on the right side of the maxilla using Clark's method. A horizontal incision was performed at the mucogingival junction. The supraperiosteal dissection is performed and the muscles insertions were gradually dissected in an apical direction up to the desired vestibular depth. The mucosa of the inner side of the lip was undermined and the pedicled mucosal flap was secured to the periosteum at the new vestibule depth by using a 4-0 absorbable suture . The wound healed by second intention without any additional graft.

PROCEDUREdiode vestibuloplasty

we utilized the Epic X TM laser from Biolase, with a center wavelength of 940 nm and a pre-initiated tip, in a contact, continuous mode, with an output energy of 3 W. Ablation with the laser tip began at the mucogingival junction with a horizontal movement directing the laser parallel to the bone, and thus slowly releasing the muscle fibers towards the new vestibule depth. The right side of the maxilla was treated by conventional vestibuloplasty, Clark s method

PROCEDUREEr-YAG laser vestibuloplasty

For the left side of the maxilla, we utilized an Er-YAG laser (Lightwalker, Fotona, Slovenia) equipped with a H14 handpiece, characterized by the following parameters: center wavelength of 2940 nm, contact mode, long pulse, energy of 200 mJ, frequency equal to 20 Hz, power of 4 W, water 2, gas 2. For the right side of the maxilla we applied conventional vestibuloplasty using Clark s method.

Sponsors

University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes" Timisoara
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
62 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- Systemically healthy 36 edentulous patients , We selected the patients to be candidates for total prostheses and complete edentulous at the level of the maxilla.

Exclusion criteria

no comorbidities \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain and comfortdays 1, 3, and 7 postoperativelyPain and discomfort values were compared between the conventional surgery and the Nd:YAG laser, diode laser, and Er-YAG laser groups by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The laser-treated sides have shown statistically significant reductions in both pain and discomfort scores at all considered timepoints (p \< 0.05), as presented in the following.
The vestibular gain depth6 weeksVestibular depth measurements were compared between the initial, the immediate postoperatively, and the 6-week postoperatively timepoints. Paired sample t-tests or Wilcoxon tests were utilized, depending on distribution, to evaluate changes within each technique (i.e., conventional and lasers).

Countries

Romania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 6, 2026