Skip to content

Comparison of Two Sedative Agents in Terms of Controlled Hypotension

COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL INFUSION VS INHALATIONAL AGENT ISOFLURANE IN TERMS OF CONTROLLED HYPOTENSION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07460050
Enrollment
136
Registered
2026-03-10
Start date
2026-03-01
Completion date
2026-08-01
Last updated
2026-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Controlled Hypotension for Nasal Surgeries

Keywords

Controlled hypotention, Propofol infusion, Endoscopic sinus surgery, Isoflurane inhalation

Brief summary

Propofol and Isoflurane are commonly used sedative agents in general anaesthesia.Both these drugs have a side effect of decreasing blood pressure which when used optimally can be used to acheive controlled hypotention. So, it provides a better visiblity of surgical filed to the surgeons.This RCT compares propofol infusion vs isoflurane inhalation for inducing controlled hypotension during endoscopic sinus surgery. The goal is to assess which agent better controls blood pressure, improves surgical field visibility, and impacts recovery. It likely measures outcomes like hemodynamics, bleeding, and surgeon satisfaction.

Detailed description

Propofol is a rapid-acting, intravenous sedative-hypnotic agent used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia, procedural sedation, and sedation for mechanically ventilated ICU patients. It acts by enhancing GABAergic inhibition in the brain, offering quick onset and short duration of action. Isoflurane is a widely used halogenated ether inhalational agent for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia functions as a central nervous system depressant by interacting with various receptors, including GABA, glutamate, and glycine receptors, to produce anesthesia. Both agents have side effect of hypotention which is useful during surgery for controlled hemodynamics, surgical field visibility and better recovery but evidence regarding their comparative effectiveness remains inconsistent. So i am comparing propofol infusion vs isoflurane for controlled hypotension in endoscopic sinus surgery. This randomized controlled trial will be conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, PGMI/ Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. A total of 136 adult patients with ASA physical status l -ll , scheduled for elective endoscopic sinus surgery under general anaesthesia will be enrolled and randomized into two equal groups. Group P will receive Propofol infusion at a dose starting at 12mg/kg/ hr titrated to the desire effect(target MAP 60-70 mmHg) while Group I will receive isoflurane inhalation (1-2% end-tidal, same MAP target). Outcomes like Surgical field quality , blood loss, recovery time, hemodynamic stability, side effects (shivering, nausea) will be observed and noted

Interventions

DRUGPropofol

Intravenous propofol infusion (starting dose 12mg/kg/hr and titrated accordingly) given to patients as sedative undergoing endscopic sinus surgery for hemodynamic stability

DRUGIsoflurane

Isoflurane inhalation (1-2% end tidal) used in patients as sedative undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for hemodynamic stability

Sponsors

Hayatabad Medical Complex
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Either male/female Age 18-65 Patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery as per the operational definition

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with cardiovascular disease Patients with pregnancy Patients with coagulopathy Patients on beta blockers or calcium channel blockers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Surgical field visibilityThe surgical field visibility time frame for propofol vs isoflurane during endoscopic sinus surgery assessed intraoperatively is usually 30-60mins postinduction

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

CONTACTDr. Laiba Khalid, Trainee Medical Officer
kgmcite15@gmail.com+923320031941
STUDY_CHAIRDr. Laiba Khalid, Postgraduate trainee

Hayat Abad Medical Complex, Peshawar

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026