Skip to content

Assessment of Consciousness With CRS-R and SECONDs

Assessment of Consciousness After Severe Brain Injury: Comparison of CRS-R and SECONDs

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07456020
Acronym
AssessConsc
Enrollment
110
Registered
2026-03-06
Start date
2026-02-01
Completion date
2028-03-31
Last updated
2026-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Disorders of Consciousness Due to Severe Brain Injury, Minimally Conscious State, Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome

Keywords

Disorders of consciousness, Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, SECONDs, Acquired Brain Injury, Neurological rehabilitation, Critical ill patients

Brief summary

Accurately determining the level of consciousness in patients with severe brain injury is essential for treatment planning, prognosis, and ethical decision-making. Clinically, levels of consciousness are differentiated into coma, Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS), and Minimally Conscious State (MCS) based on behavioral signs. Although behavioral assessment is considered the clinical gold standard, it is prone to misclassification. Research has shown that a substantial proportion of patients initially diagnosed with UWS may actually show signs of minimal consciousness, which is associated with better cognitive abilities and a more favorable prognosis. The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is internationally recommended for diagnosing disorders of consciousness, but it is time-consuming and not free from diagnostic error. Repeated assessments can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. To enhance feasibility in routine clinical practice, a shorter and more time-efficient assessment tool, the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs), was developed. This scale focuses on the behavioral signs most strongly associated with MCS and uses optimized testing procedures while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy. The aim of this study is to further evaluate diagnostic approaches for assessing consciousness in patients with severe brain injury and to improve the reliability and clinical applicability of these assessments.

Detailed description

This prospective observational study is designed to evaluate the clinical utility and diagnostic performance of the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs) in a neurological rehabilitation setting. The study aims to assess whether the implementation of SECONDs improves diagnostic accuracy in patients with disorders of consciousness during the subacute phase after severe acquired brain injury. Participants will undergo structured behavioral assessment using SECONDs as part of the study protocol. Diagnostic classifications derived from SECONDs will be analyzed with regard to their internal consistency and clinical plausibility within the rehabilitation context. To examine prognostic validity, functional outcome will be assessed 12 months after the initial evaluation. Follow-up data will be collected through structured telephone interviews with relatives or legal representatives. Functional status will be systematically documented in order to determine the predictive value of SECONDs classifications for long-term clinically relevant outcomes. The study seeks to contribute to optimizing diagnostic procedures in disorders of consciousness and to strengthen the evidence base for time-efficient behavioral assessment tools in routine neurorehabilitation practice.

Interventions

The Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs) is a structured behavioral assessment tool designed for the rapid evaluation of patients with disorders of consciousness.

The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is a standardized behavioral assessment tool used to evaluate the level of consciousness in patients with severe brain injury. It consists of six subscales assessing auditory, visual, motor, oromotor/verbal, communication, and arousal functions.

Sponsors

BDH-Klinik Hessisch Oldendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) or intermediate/high-dependency care unit * Underlying etiology of brain injury: anoxic, traumatic, or vascular * Time since index event \< 90 days * Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI) score \< 30 points

Exclusion criteria

* History of prior brain injury * Pre-existing major psychiatric disorder * Impaired language comprehension (e.g., insufficient German language proficiency or aphasia) * Ongoing sedation at the time of assessment * Interruption of rehabilitation treatment (transfer to an acute care hospital) for more than 14 days * isolation precautions due to multidrug-resistant organisms

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Agreement Between the "Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders" (SECONDs; Range: 0-8) and the "Coma Recovery Scale-Revised" (CRS-R; Range: 0-23)6-8 days after admission to neurological rehabilitationCategorical agreement in clinical classification of level of consciousness (Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome \[UWS\], Minimally Conscious State \[MCS\], Emerged from Minimally Conscious State \[eMCS\], No Disorder of Consciousness \[non-DoC\]) between the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs) and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic Stability in Patients Initially Classified as UWS6-8 days after admission to neurological rehabilitationRate of diagnostic reclassification following repeated behavioral assessment on two consecutive days in patients initially diagnosed with Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS). Misdiagnosis rate is defined as the proportion of patients whose level of consciousness is reclassified into a different diagnostic category (e.g., from UWS to Minimally Conscious State \[MCS\]) upon repeat measurement.
Prognostic Validity of the "Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders" (SECONDs; Range: 0-8) for Long-Term Functional Outcome12 months after admission.Predictive value of baseline classification using the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs; ; Range: 0-8) for functional outcome at 12 months after admission, as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE; Range: 1-8).
Feasibility of the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs)6-8 days after admission to neurological rehabilitationAssessment of clinical feasibility of SECONDs in a neurological rehabilitation setting, including test completion rate, administration time per assessment, and occurrence of premature test termination or technical/practical difficulties.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

CONTACTMelanie Boltzmann, PhD
m.boltzmann@bdh-klinik-hessisch-oldendorf.de+49 5152781256
CONTACTSimone B. Jenner
s.jenner@bdh-klinik-hessisch-oldendorf.de+49 5152781215
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMelanie Boltzmann, PhD

BDH-Klinik Hessisch Oldendorf

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026