Skip to content

A Trial to Study if REGN17372 in Combination With Linvoseltamab is Tolerable for Adult Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

A FIH Phase 1/2 Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Anti-Tumor Activity of REGN17372, an Anti-GPRC5D x Anti-CD28 Costimulatory Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody, in Combination With Linvoseltamab, an Anti-BCMA x Anti-CD3 Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody, in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07455851
Enrollment
150
Registered
2026-03-06
Start date
2026-03-26
Completion date
2033-09-30
Last updated
2026-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Keywords

B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), G-protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)

Brief summary

This study is researching a drug called REGN17372 used with another drug called linvoseltamab (each individually called "study drug" or "study drugs" when combined) in participants with relapsed (when a tumor comes back) or refractory (when a tumor does not respond to treatment) multiple myeloma. This study is the first time REGN17372 will be given to humans. The aim of the study is to understand if REGN17372 can be given safely with linvoseltamab, and if so, what dosing regimen should be used for this treatment combination, in comparison with linvoseltamab alone. The study is looking at: * What side effects may happen from taking REGN17372 with linvoseltamab * How well REGN17372 and linvoseltamab, or linvoseltamab alone, work in treating multiple myeloma * What is the best dose of REGN17372 when given with linvoseltamab * How much study drug(s) are in the blood at different times * Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drugs (which could make the study drugs less effective or could lead to side effects) * If and how REGN17372 and linvoseltamab affect the overall quality of life, daily activities, symptoms and treatment side effects based on participant own feedback (Phase 2)

Interventions

DRUGLinvoseltamab

Administered per protocol

DRUGREGN17372+Linvoseltamab

Administered per the protocol

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Phase 1: non-randomized dose escalation Phase 2: randomized dose expansion

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: 1. Participants with RRMM who have exhausted (or are not a candidate for) all therapeutic options that are expected to provide meaningful clinical benefit and have received at least 3 lines of therapy as defined in the protocol 2. ECOG performance status score ≤1 3. Participants must have measurable disease for response assessment as described in the protocol 4. Adequate hematologic, cardiac, hepatic, and renal function, as described in the protocol Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Participants with non-secretory MM, active plasma cell leukemia, known amyloidosis, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or known POEMS syndrome as defined in the protocol 2. Participants who have known MM brain lesions or CNS involvement 3. Participants with a history of PML, a neurocognitive condition or CNS movement disorder, or a history of seizure within 12 months prior to entering screening 4. Prior treatment with GPRC5D-directed immunotherapies (phase 1 and phase 2) and/or prior treatment with a BCMAxCD3 bispecific antibody (phase 2) Note: Other protocol defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occurrence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) from the first dose of REGN17372 in combination with linvoseltamabUp to 35 daysPhase 1
Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) associated with REGN17372 in combination with linvoseltamabUp to 5 yearsPhase 1
Severity of TEAEs associated with REGN17372 in combination with linvoseltamabUp to 5 yearsPhase 1
Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or better as determined by the investigator using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria in patients receiving combination study drugsWithin 12 weeks of starting cycle 1Phase 2
VGPR or better as determined by the investigator using the IMWG response criteria in patients receiving Linvoseltamab monotherapyWithin 12 weeks of starting cycle 1Phase 2
Partial Response (PR) or better as determined by the investigator using the IMWG response criteria in patients receiving combination study drugsWithin 12 weeks of starting cycle 1Phase 2
PR or better as determined by the investigator using the IMWG response criteria in patients receiving Linvoseltamab monotherapyWithin 12 weeks of starting cycle 1Phase 2

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concentrations of REGN17372 in serumUp to 5 yearsPhase 1 and Phase 2
Concentrations of linvoseltamab in serumUp to 5 yearsPhase 1 and Phase 2
Occurrence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to REGN17372Up to 5 yearsPhase 1 and Phase 2
Magnitude of ADA to REGN17372Up to 5 yearsPhase 1 and Phase 2
Incidence of ADA to linvoseltamabUp to 5 yearsPhase 1 and Phase 2
Magnitude of ADA to linvoseltamabUp to 5 yearsPhase 1 and Phase 2
Objective Response Rate (ORR) as assessed by IMWG response criteria as determined by the investigatorUp to 5 yearsPhase 1 and Phase 2
Complete response (CR) as assessed by IMWG response criteria as determined by the investigatorUp to 5 yearsPhase 1 and Phase 2
VGPR as assessed by IMWG response criteria, as determined by the investigatorUp to 5 yearsPhase 1 and Phase 2
Duration of Response (DOR) as assessed by IMWG criteria as determined by the investigatorUp to 5 yearsPhase 1 and Phase 2
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as assessed by IMWG criteria as determined by the investigatorUp to 5 yearsPhase 1 and Phase 2
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negative status (at 10^-5) in participants in CR or betterUp to 5 yearsPhase 1 and Phase 2
Overall Survival (OS)Up to 5 yearsPhase 1 and Phase 2
ORR as assessed using the IMWG response criteria as determined by the investigator in patients receiving combination study drugsWithin 12 weeks of starting cycle 1Phase 1
VGPR assessed using IMWG criteria as determined by the investigator in patients receiving combination study drugsWithin 12 weeks of starting cycle 1Phase 1
Incidence of TEAEsUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Severity of TEAEsUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Change from baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status / Quality of Life (GHS/QoL)Up to 5 yearsPhase 2 The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including global health status/quality of life, functional Scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Participants rate items on a 4-point scale, with 1 as "not at all" and 4 as "very much"
Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning (PF)Up to 5 yearsPhase 2
Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning (RF)Up to 5 yearsPhase 2
Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 painUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigueUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Time to definitive deterioration in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoLUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Time to definitive deterioration in EORTC QLQ-C30 PFUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Time to definitive deterioration in EORTC QLQ-C30 RFUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Time to definitive deterioration in EORTC QLQ-C30 painUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Time to definitive deterioration in EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigueUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Time to first improvement in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoLUp to 5 yearsPhase2
Time to first improvement in EORTC QLQ-C30 PFUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Time to first improvement in EORTC QLQ-C30 RFUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Time to first improvement in EORTC QLQ-C30 painUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Time to first improvement in EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigueUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-Multiple Myeloma Module (MY20) Disease Symptoms (DS)Up to 5 yearsPhase 2 The EORTC QLQ-MY20 is a self -administered instrument to assess QoL in persons with MM. This 20-item questionnaire measures the following domains: symptom scales, including disease symptoms (6 items) and symptoms related to side effects of treatment (10 items); function scale and future perspective (3 items); and body image (1 item). A high score represents a high level of symptoms or problems
Time to definitive deterioration in EORTC QLQ-MY20 DSUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Time to first improvement in EORTC QLQ-MY20 DSUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-MY20 Treatment Side Effects (TSE)Up to 5 yearsPhase 2
Time to definitive deterioration in EORTC QLQ-MY20 TSEUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Time to first improvement in EORTC QLQ-MY20 TSEUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Change from baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions, 5-level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Score (VAS) (EQ-5D-5L VAS)Up to 5 yearsPhase 2 The EQ-5D-5L consists of EQ-5D descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems
Time to definitive deterioration in EQ-5D-5L VASUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Time to first improvement in EQ-5D-5L VASUp to 5 yearsPhase 2
Patient-reported overall impact of treatment toxicity measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACIT) Item GP5Up to 5 yearsPhase 2 The FACIT Item GP5 will be used to assess the patient-reported impact of treatment toxicity that uses a single item "I am bothered by side effects of treatment" on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all, 1 = a little bit, 2 = somewhat, 3 = quite a bit, 4 = very much)
Patient-reported tolerability as measured by the Patient Reported Outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)Up to 5 yearsPhase 2 The PRO-CTAE questionnaire assesses side effects and symptoms in cancer clinical trials using a PRO-CTCAE score. The PRO-CTCAE includes an item library of 124 items representing 78 symptomatic AEs drawn from the CTCAE

Countries

Australia, Greece

Contacts

CONTACTClinical Trials Administrator
clinicaltrials@regeneron.com844-734-6643
STUDY_DIRECTORClinical Trial Management

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 12, 2026