Skip to content

Cortical Excitability During de Novo Motor Learning

Cortical Excitability During de Novo Motor Learning in Healthy Subjects : an Exploratory Longitudinal Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07455461
Acronym
StimNovoLearn
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-03-06
Start date
2026-02-25
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2026-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Corticospinal Excitability, Motor Learning

Brief summary

De novo motor learning is a specific learning paradigm that allows investigation of how a new motor skill is learned from scratch. Motor task learning can induce increased corticospinal excitability and reorganization of connectivity observed within the motor cortex (M1). Several studies have investigated the plasticity mechanisms underlying motor learning using simple paradigms. The results obtained have been variable, with a major trend toward increased corticospinal excitability, while other results show no increase. We expect to observe a significant increase in excitability and enhanced intracortical reorganization mechanisms within M1 in our subjects during our de novo motor learning sessions. The primary objective of this study is to measure changes in corticospinal excitability of the motor system across 3 de novo motor learning sessions separated by different time intervals. The secondary objectives will be: 1) to measure learning across the three practice sessions, 2) to measure changes in inhibition and facilitation across the 3 learning sessions, and 3) to measure correlations between subjects' motor performance and corticospinal and intracortical changes.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDe novo motor learning

Subjects will follow 3 sessions of de-novo motor learning (days 1, 2, 8)

Sponsors

Universite du Littoral Cote d'Opale
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* right-handed * healthy * having signed an informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* counter-indication to transcranial magnetic stimulation * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Amplitude Input-Output Curve Assessed by Single-Pulse TMSBaseline (Day 1, pre-session), immediately post-session on Day 1, pre-session on Day 2, immediately post-session on Day 2, pre-session on Day 9, and immediately post-session on Day 9Motor Evoked Potential amplitude (mV) recorded from the target muscle (Abductor Pollicis Brevis) in response to increasing TMS intensities. The parameters of the sigmoid input-output curve will be calculated using a Boltzmann function fit.
Change in Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) Assessed by Paired-Pulse TMSBaseline (Day 1, pre-session), immediately post-session on Day 1, pre-session on Day 2, immediately post-session on Day 2, pre-session on Day 9, and immediately post-session on Day 9Conditioned MEP amplitude expressed as a ratio of unconditioned MEP amplitude (%), using a conditioning stimulus at 80% RMT and inter-stimulus interval of 3 ms.
Change in Long-Interval Intracortical Inhibition (LICI) Assessed by Paired-Pulse TMSBaseline (Day 1, pre-session), immediately post-session on Day 1, pre-session on Day 2, immediately post-session on Day 2, pre-session on Day 9, and immediately post-session on Day 9Conditioned MEP amplitude as a ratio of unconditioned MEP amplitude (%), using a conditioning stimulus at suprathreshold intensity and inter-stimulus interval of 100ms.
Change in Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) Assessed by Paired-Pulse TMSBaseline (Day 1, pre-session), immediately post-session on Day 1, pre-session on Day 2, immediately post-session on Day 2, pre-session on Day 9, and immediately post-session on Day 9Conditioned MEP amplitude as a ratio of unconditioned MEP amplitude (%), using a conditioning stimulus at 80% RMT and an inter-stimulus interval of 10ms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Motor Learning Performance Assessed by Movement Path Length During a 3D Finger-Cursor TaskDuring each motor learning session on Day 1, Day 2, and Day 9Path length (mm) of the cursor trajectory during each trial of the motor learning task. Shorter path length indicates more efficient, learned movement.

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTPierre D Morel, Dr
pierre.morel@univ-littoral.fr0033781692692

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026