Skip to content

Left Atrial Appendage Closure With Versus Without Pulsed Field Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Mild Symptoms and High Stroke Risk

Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Pulsed Field Ablation Procedure Versus Left Atrial Appendage Closure Alone in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Mild Symptoms and High Risk of Stroke: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07453940
Acronym
REVERSE-OPTION
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-03-06
Start date
2026-05-07
Completion date
2027-01-31
Last updated
2026-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE for ATRIAL FIBRILLATION, PFA Ablation and LAAC Procedures

Brief summary

This study is a prospective, multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial to investigate whether concomitant left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and pulsed field ablation (PFA) is more effective than LAAC alone in improving the outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with high risk of stroke. Emerging data show that some-especially those with persistent AF, high AF burden, or early atrial re-modelling-have high stroke and heart failure risks. This pilot study aims to assess whether combining LAAC and PFA improves outcomes more than LAAC alone in persistent AF patients at high stroke risk. Fifty participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the LAAC or LAAC plus PFA group, with group allocation blinded. Baseline assessments included cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life questionnaire (AFEQT) , and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the LAAC group, patients will undergo electrical cardioversion followed by LAAC under general anesthesia; if sinus rhythm could not be achieved by the end of procedure, pharmocol cardioversion will be tried to restore it. In the LAAC plus PFA group, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and posterior wall isolation (PWI) will be performed using the FARAPULSE system, then LAAC will be done. If sinus rhythm could not be restored after PFA, cardioversion will be performed. Additional ablation is allowed only if a clear arrhythmia mechanism is identified; empirical ablation is prohibited. Follow-up occurs every two months with 7-day Holter monitoring. CPET, AFEQT, and brain MRI will be repeated at 6 months. During the blanking period, antiarrhythmic drugs may be used except amiodarone due to its long half-life. Ablation is not recommended within the first two months. Crossover to ablation is permitted only for patients with documented AF/AFL/AT recurrence and worsened symptoms (AFEQT score drop ≥10 points from baseline). At crossover or redo-ablation, AFEQT, CPET, and brain MRI will be repeated.

Interventions

PROCEDURELAAC plus PFA for persistent AF with high risk of stroke

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and posterior wall isolation (PWI) will be performed using the FARAPULSE system, then LAAC will be done. If sinus rhythm could not be restored after PFA, cardioversion will be performed. Additional ablation is allowed only if a clear arrhythmia mechanism is identified; empirical ablation is prohibited.

PROCEDURELAAC for persistent AF with high risk of stroke

Patients will undergo electrical cardioversion followed by LAAC under general anesthesia; if sinus rhythm could not be achieved by the end of procedure, pharmocol cardioversion will be tried to restore it.

Sponsors

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years old. 2. Subjects diagnosed with persistent AF with duration more than 3 months. 3. Subjects with AFEQT score \>70 . 4. Subjects with CHA2DS2-VA score ≥2. 5. Subjects who are willing and capable of providing ICF and participating in all testing associated with this study.

Exclusion criteria

1. AF that is secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, alcohol, or other reversible/non-cardiac causes. 2. Subjects with the history of AF ablation, LAA surgically closed or otherwise excluded or the LAA anatomy does not accommodate a Closure Device. 3. Left atrial anteroposterior diameter ≥ 5.5 cm. 4. Heart failure with a NYHA III/IV and/or LVEF ≤35% within 3 months prior to the procedure. 5. Any of the following events within 90 days of the Consent Date: * Myocardial infarction, unstable angina or coronary intervention or any cardiac surgery * Pericarditis or symptomatic pericardial effusion * Gastrointestinal bleeding * Stroke, TIA, or intracranial bleeding or any non-neurologic thromboembolic event 6. Contraindication to, or unwillingness to use systemic anticoagulation. 7. Subjects with contraindications or not tolerate to EP procedure, general anaesthesia, or the tests included in the study, like CPET, MRI. 8. Subjects cannot be removed from Class I/III AAD for reasons other than atrial arrhythmia. 9. Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant or lactating. 10. Renal insufficiency if an eGFR is \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, or with any history of renal dialysis or renal transplant. 11. Predicted life expectancy is less than 12 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in peak VO₂ from baseline to 6 months as assessed by CPET6 monthsChange in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO₂) measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) at the 6-month visit compared with baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change of AFEQT at 6-month visit compared to baseline.6 monthsThe change of Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life questionnaire (AFEQT) at 6-month visit compared to baseline, range: 0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life
Symptomatic AF recurrence at 6 month visit after blanking period.6 months
The change in CBF over 6 months.6 monthsChange in cerebral blood flow (CBF) from baseline to 6 months as assessed by arterial spin labeling brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
The incidence of composite clinical events6 MONTHSThe incidence of composite clinical events, including death from cardiovascular causes, stroke (either ischemic or hemorrhagic), major bleeding or hospitalization with worsening of heart failure (unplanned hospitalization and/or intravenous use of diuretics) or acute coronary syndrome.
AF burden determined by 7 d Holter during the follow-up visits.6 MONTHS
Echocardiology parameters6 MONTHSLVEF, LA diameter, left atrial strain (LASr, LASct, LASI)
Cognitive function: MoCA scale6 MONTHSChange in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total score from baseline to 6 months, MoCA total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. The outcome will be summarized as the mean change (6-month minus baseline).

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 2, 2026