Tobacco Prevention
Conditions
Keywords
Tobacco prevention, Health literacy, Non-pharmaceutical intervention, Children
Brief summary
The goal of this pilot RCT is to evaluate the effectiveness of comics containing tobacco-related content in improving tobacco-related knowledge and attitudes among Hong Kong primary school students. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the intervention (i.e. comics) effective in improving tobacco-related knowledge (including alternative smoking products (ASPs) and tobacco control development in the world and Hong Kong) compared to controls (i.e. information sheets)? * Is the intervention (i.e.comics) effective in improving tobacco-related attitudes and intentions (including ASPs and tobacco control development in the world and Hong Kong) compared to controls (i.e. information sheets)? Researchers will compare the questionnaire results from students to see if intervention groups (students reading comics) will have better tobacco-related knowledge, higher anti-tobacco attitudes and lower intention to smoke compared to the control group (students reading information sheets).
Interventions
OTHERTobacco-related comics
A series of five comics are developed specifically for this study. The comics will address five key themes which we found could be reinforced based on our previous project. This includes \[1\] the harms of tobacco use, \[2\] secondhand smoke (SHS), \[3\] thirdhand smoke (THS), \[4\] alternative smoking products (ASPs), and \[5\] the tobacco industry and tobacco-related policies in Hong Kong and worldwide.
OTHERConventional health leaflet
The selected leaflets will be based on information from existing tobacco prevention leaflets routinely distributed by the Tobacco and Alcohol Control Office and the Student Health Service and specifically targeting students.
Sponsors
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong Council on Smoking and Health
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
9 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Primary 5-6 students from local primary schools * Able to read Chinese
Exclusion criteria
\- None
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness of intervention on tobacco-related knowledge (including ASPs and tobacco control development in the world and Hong Kong) | Right before the intervention and at 12-16th days | Students reported their opinions towards 5 statements in both pre-test and post-test: 1\) Smoking accelerates skin ageing; 2) Secondhand smoke can trigger asthma and middle ear infections in children; 3) Opening windows or using a fan can eliminate the effects of thirdhand smoke; 4) E-cigarettes with added flavors are harmless to the body; 5) Hong Kong prohibits smoking while queuing for public transport. Questions may be subject to change, as they will be adjusted according to the leaflets/comics, while maintaining a similar format. Students' knowledge will be assessed using a 3-point Likert scale, with each item rated on a 3-point Likert scale ranging from -1 (wrong) to 1 (correct). |
| Effectiveness of intervention on tobacco-related attitudes (including ASPs and tobacco control development in the world and Hong Kong) | Right before the intervention and at 12-16th days. | Students will report their opinions towards 5 statements: 1) Banning smoking in all places would harm smokers' rights; 2) I will actively avoid secondhand smoke; 3) Using e-cigarettes is safer than smoking traditional cigarettes; 4) Tobacco companies use various methods to encourage people to smoke; 5) The government should ban the sale of flavored smoking products. Questions may be subject to change, as they will be adjusted according to the leaflets/comics, while maintaining a similar format. Students' attitudes will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Item scores will be recoded as appropriate, so that higher scores consistently reflect more negative attitudes. |
| Effectiveness of intervention on tobacco-related intentions (including ASPs and tobacco control development in the world and Hong Kong) | Right before the intervention and at 12-16th days. | Students were asked: If one of your good friends offers you a traditional cigarette, e-cigarette or heated tobacco product, ask you to have a few puffs, and no one will know about this as no more smoking in the future. Will you use them? Students' intention will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Definitely no) to 5 (Definitely yes). Lower scores indicate a lower intention to use ASPs. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness of intervention on SHS and THS exposure at home | Right before the intervention and at 12-16th days. | Students were asked: In the past 7 days, how many days (0-7) 1) was someone smoking next to you when you were at home? 2) do you smell secondhand smoke drifting in from outside when you were at home? 3) was someone smoking next to you when you were outside home? 4) you can smell cigarette smoke on objects or people when you are at home and no one is smoking, and you don't see any smoke? Each item was rated on an 8-point scale ranging from 0 (0 days) to 7 (7 days), with higher scores indicating more frequent exposure to secondhand smoke (i.e., a worse outcome). |
| Effectiveness of intervention on tobacco use | Right before the intervention and at 12-16th days. | Students were asked: 1) Which of the following tobacco products have you ever used? 2) In the past 30 days, which of the following tobacco products have you used? |
| Adherence to the 5-day intervention | At 12-16th days | Students will report their adherence to the intervention. Students were asked: In the past two weeks, how many comics / leaflets did you read in total? |
| Satisfaction of students towards intervention | At 12-16th days | Students were aksed: 1. Do you find the content of the comics / leaflets engaging? 2. Do you think the content of the comics / leaflets is easy to understand? 3. What do you think about the length of the comic/leaflet? 4. If the comics / leaflets include more new information about tobacco in the future, would you like to read them? |
Countries
Hong Kong
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORShiu Lun Ryan Au Yeung
School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong
Outcome results
None listed