Skip to content

Airway Scope vs GlideScope for Intubation in Obese Patients

Comparison of GlideScope and Airway Scope for Intubating Morbidly Obese Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07453563
Enrollment
70
Registered
2026-03-06
Start date
2026-07-13
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2026-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intratracheal Inbubation

Brief summary

This study compares the time required to complete intubation in obese patients (Body Mass Index 40 or greater) when using either the GlideScope or Airway Scope video laryngoscope device to help place the endotracheal tube.

Detailed description

This is a randomized controlled trial of two video laryngoscope devices when used in patients with high (≥40) Body Mass Index (BMI): Airway Scope (Nihon Kohden) and GlideScope (Verathon Inc.). The study compares several outcomes as proxies for ease of intubation including time to complete intubation, number of attempts needed, minimum peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) during intubation, and number of episodes of SpO2 falling below 90% before intubation is completed. The patient population is consenting adult patients with BMI ≥40, who are already scheduled for general anesthesia. Intubations will be performed by attending anesthesiologists or anesthesiology residents. Obesity is a known risk factor for difficult intubation due to anatomical changes caused by increased soft tissue around the face and neck. Obese patients' blood oxygen level can rapidly fall during intubation because these patients often have reduced functional residual capacity, and the acuity of any complications may also be increased because these patients also often have additional comorbidities.

Interventions

DEVICEIntubation with GlideScope

Intubation performed by anesthesiologist using the GlideScope video laryngoscope device

DEVICEIntubation with Airway Scope

Intubation performed by anesthesiologist using the Airway Scope video laryngoscope device

Sponsors

University of New Mexico
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult (age ≥18 years) * Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥40 * Scheduled for surgery with general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Congenital facial or airway anomalies * History of major neck surgery or tracheostomy * History of any lung diseases/conditions such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, lung resection, or lung cancer * History of cardiac failure or myocardial infarction * Prisoners

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation completion timePerioperative/PeriproceduralTime interval between the start of the intubation procedure and its completion, defined by confirmed end-tidal carbon dioxide (CO2) observation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Humber of hypoxia episodesPerioperative/PeriproceduralThe number of episodes of hypoxia during the intubation procedure, defined as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) \<90%.
Number of intubation attemptsPerioperative/PeriproceduralThe count of attempts required to complete the intubation procedure, with completion defined as confirmed end-tidal CO2
Minimum SpO2 observed during intubationPerioperative/PeriproceduralThe minimum value of SpO2 observed during the intubation procedure

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTYuta Kashiwagi, MD
YKashiwagi@salud.unm.edu505-272-2610

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 15, 2026