Skip to content

Strength Tracking From Wall Tichness Over Aortic Biomechanics (STORM)

Strength Tracking From Wall Tichness Over Aortic Biomechanics

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07453251
Acronym
STORM
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-03-05
Start date
2025-10-25
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aneurysm Aortic, Aneurysm Aortic Root

Keywords

aortic aneurysm, bicuspid aortic valve, tricuspid aortic valve, tensile testing, aortic strength, aortic rupture

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to analyse the resected portion of aneurysmatic ascending aorta in order to assess its strength to rupture, standardise the various measurements performed within the lab and try to correlate these qualitative results with quantitative results (regarding aortic diameter, valve morphology and aortic wall thickness).

Detailed description

The aortic wall is subjected to mechanical stresses in radial, circumferential, and longitudinal directions. The amount of these shear stresses varies with the distribution of velocity across the vessel lumen and with local vessel geometry. Diseases affecting the thoracic aorta can be categorized into acute and chronic. Chronic aortic pathologies are chronic aortic dissections and aortic aneurysms. Today, there are computational tools available to permit the calculation of stresses of the aortic wall. For the above-mentioned reasons, this study becomes of extreme interest as it may be capable of further assessing the mechanical properties of the dilated aortic tissue, its' strength to rupture and stiffness, in order to provide an overview of the fragility of ascending aortic aneurysms. This parameter, associated to the diameter of the pathological aorta, may provide an additional tool regarding the clinical history of patients and insight concerning surgical indication. Matter of factly, knowing the risk of rupture based on diameter may have strong implications on the preoperative evaluation of patients and the decision-making process.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Pavia
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing cardiac surgery for either aortic root and/or ascending aortic aneurysms; • Patients that have received, understood and signed the written informed consent for this study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients that have already undergone previous cardiac surgery; • Patients that present with acute aortic pathologies, such as acute aortic dissection or intramural hematoma.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Strength to ruptureDuring laboratory testingDefine the strength to rupture of the removed aortic segments and its relation with the circumferential and longitudinal direction along the aortic axis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluate aortic characteristicsFrom surgery to laboratory testingEvaluate multiple characteristics of the surgically excised pathologically enlarged aortic segments: shape alteration, tensile strength, elasticity capacity.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026