Skip to content

3D Ultrasound in Hemophilic Ankles

Can Ultrasound "See" What Clinicians Cannot in Hemophilic Arthropathy? Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Physical Examination Perspectives

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07452575
Enrollment
11
Registered
2026-03-05
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemophilia

Keywords

hemophilia, ultrasound, mechanical arm, children

Brief summary

The study examines whether a mechanical arm ultrasound system provides diagnostic accuracy comparable to expert-performed full ultrasound for detecting key joint components and whether it can reduce acquisition variability without compromising accuracy, as measured by false-positive and false-negative rates.

Interventions

DEVICEMechanical Ultrasound

3D ultrasound imaging is a non-invasive technique. The device consists of a stationary platform and a water-filled rotating drum designed to acquire 3D ultrasound images of the ankles. An ultrasound transducer is mounted on a mechanical arm, which positions and orients it toward the rotating axis of the drum. The collected ultrasound images will be mapped into 3D space, and the volume will be reconstructed using software developed by the manufacturer.

Sponsors

The Hospital for Sick Children
Lead SponsorOTHER
Western University, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of hemophilia A or B or other bleeding disorders * Cooperative patients * Previous study joint bleed (by history) or suspicion of an acute joint bleed

Exclusion criteria

* Co-morbid chronic illnesses causing osteoarticular findings * MRI contraindications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1. Diagnostic Accuracy of 3DUS compared with full ultrasound and MRIDay 1Proportion of correctly classified cases comparing 3DUS findings against full ultrasoind and MRI (reference standard)
Ability of 3DUS to quantify individual joint components (synovial hypertrophy, hemarthrosis, hemosiderin, bone erosions/subchondral cysts, cartilage loss)Day 1Findings will be measured as normal, mild, moderate and severe

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Integration of 3D ultrasound into Diagnostic AlgorithmDay 1Number of cases where 3DUS prevents the need for MRI or full ultrasound or improves detection of early arthropathy.

Contacts

CONTACTPrincipal Investigator
andrea.doria@sickkids.ca+416-813-6079
CONTACTClinical Research Project Manager
+416-813-7654

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026