Skip to content

Safety and Effectiveness of TETRANITE Bone Adhesive for Cranial Flap Fixation Compared to Traditional Metal Hardware

Safety and Effectiveness of TETRANITE Bone Adhesive for Cranial Flap Fixation Compared to Traditional Metal Hardware

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07452549
Enrollment
204
Registered
2026-03-05
Start date
2026-04-15
Completion date
2027-12-15
Last updated
2026-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Craniotomy

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of TETRANITE, a bioresorbable bone adhesive, for Cranial Flap Fixation as compared to traditional metal hardware.

Detailed description

This two arm study will assess the safety and efficacy of TETRANITE, a bioresorbable bone adhesive, for Cranial Flap Fixation as compared to traditional metal hardware. The control arm for this study is the standard of care plating system. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the TETRANITE arm, or the standard of care plating system arm. Participants will generally follow their standard of care follow-up for surgery for one year.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTTetranite for Cranial Flap Fixation

Tetranite for Cranial Flap Fixation is a bioresorbable bone adhesive that can be used to re-adhere the cranial flap following a craniotomy.

DEVICEStandard of Care Plating System

The standard of care titanium plates and screws will be used to re-adhere the cranial flap following a craniotomy.

Sponsors

RevBio
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject, and/or subject's family are able and willing to provide informed consent and HIPAA authorization prior to any study related procedures. * Subjects can be any gender, but be between (and including) 18 and 80 years of age * Subject is scheduled for a cranial procedure that requires the creation of a bone flap or replacement of a bone flap (i.e., cranioplasty) * Subject is scheduled for a cranial procedure in the supratentorial location. * Subject is able and willing to meet all study requirements, including attending all post-index procedure assessment visits and radiological tests. * Pre-operative CT scan for craniotomy patients must be less than or equal to 0.625 mm slice thickness and pixel spacing. It shall include the skull in native condition near the planned flap site DICOM export must be thin sliced reconstruction in the bone window. Intra-Operative Inclusion Criteria: • Width of craniotomy kerf line \< 3mm for more than 75% of the bone flap border.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has undergone a previous, open intracranial neurosurgical procedure in the same anatomical location. (Note: stereotactic biopsy is not exclusionary). * Subject requires a craniectomy (the bone flap is not replaced during the current surgery). * Subject has had radiation treatment to the surgical site within the past year, or standard fractionated radiation therapy was planned within 2 weeks post index-procedure. (Note: stereotactic radiosurgery prior to the planned index procedure was not an exclusion criterion.) * Subject requires a procedure involving a translabyrinthine, transsphenoidal, transoral approach, or any procedure that penetrates the air sinus or mastoid air cells. Note: Superficial penetration of mastoid air cells is not an exclusion if cells were appropriately sealed (e.g., bone wax). * Subject has clinically significant hydrocephalus or clinical evidence of altered CSF dynamics. Subject has undergone chemotherapy treatment, excluding hormonal therapy, within three weeks prior to the planned index procedure, or use of intracavitary chemotherapy wafer (BCNU) was planned, or chemotherapy treatment was planned within two weeks after the index procedure was performed. * Standard use of peri-operative steroids (i.e., corticosteroids) is permitted. Chronic steroid use (defined as daily use of corticosteroids for ≥ 8 weeks) for the purposes of reducing the side effects of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy for cancer is not exclusionary unless the patient is deemed by the investigator to be suffering from steroid toxicity (i.e., Cushing's syndrome) manifested by symptoms and signs such as thin skin, striae, easy bruising, muscle atrophy, upper body obesity, severe fatigue, etc. Use of corticosteroids on a chronic basis (as defined previously) for purposes other than decreasing the symptoms of systemic chemotherapy is exclusionary unless those steroids were discontinued 4 weeks prior to the planned index procedure. * Subject has a condition with anticipated survival shorter than one year. * Subject receives warfarin, heparin, other anticoagulant agents on a daily basis and pre-surgical, standard of care drug wash-out did not occur. * Subject is pregnant, breast-feeding, or intended to become pregnant during the course of the study. * Current infection (either superficial or deep) at the planned operative site * Sepsis diagnosed within one week before the planned index procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flap immobility at final surgical fixation (patient)At enrollment surgeryImmobility of the flap prior to surgical closure, assessed by the principal investigator and an independent neurosurgeon.
Flap immobility at 6 months (surgeon)6 months after index surgeryFlap immobility assessed through a flap mobility assessment by the principal investigator and an independent neurosurgeon.
No incidence of serious adverse events, including unplanned retreatment of the original surgical site, adjudicated by the CEC to be device-related within 6 months of index surgery.6 months from enrollmentNo incidence of serious adverse events, including unplanned retreatment of the original surgical site, adjudicated by the CEC to be device-related within 6 months of index surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flap immobility through 12 months (patient)12 monthsFlap immobility assessed by the patient through a survey.
Serious adverse events, including unplanned retreatment of the original surgical site, adjudicated by the CEC to be device-related beyond 6 months of index surgery.6 months from enrollment to 12 monthsSerious adverse events, including unplanned retreatment of the original surgical site, adjudicated by the CEC to be device-related beyond 6 months of index surgery.
Adverse events, including CSF leaks or wound dehiscenceFrom enrollment through 12 months after index surgery.Adverse events, including CSF leaks or wound dehiscence
Patient reported outcome using PROMIS10Enrollment through 12 months from index surgery.Survey sent to the patient to complete independently.
Patient reported outcome using VAS Pain ScoreEnrollment through 12 months from index surgerySurvey sent to the patient to complete independently.
Patient reported outcome using Cranio-Facial PROMSEnrollment through 12 months from index surgerySurvey sent to the patient to complete independently.
Flap volume change to assess growth/atrophy based on CT at 6 and 12 Months6 months and 12 monthsFlap volume change to assess growth/atrophy based on CT at 6 and 12 Months
Flap fusion to assess bony bridging of the kerf and burr holes via kerf and burr hole gap volume increase/decrease based on CT at 6 and 12 Months6 months and 12 monthsFlap fusion to assess bony bridging of the kerf and burr holes via kerf and burr hole gap volume increase/decrease based on CT at 6 and 12 Months
Flap congruence to assess immediate post-operative conformance to surrounding bone1-4 days from index surgery (+7/-3)Flap congruence to assess immediate post-operative conformance to surrounding bone
Flap displacement to assess migration via peak displacement of the flap surface based on CT at 6 and 12 Months compared to post-operative placement6 months and 12 monthsFlap displacement to assess migration via peak displacement of the flap surface based on CT at 6 and 12 Months compared to post-operative placement
Artifact assessment of distortion that obscures lesion detection based on available standard of care MRI throughout the 12- month study periodFrom enrollment through 12 months following index procedureArtifact assessment of distortion that obscures lesion detection based on available standard of care MRI throughout the 12- month study period

Contacts

CONTACTGracie Cleaver
gcleaver@revbio.com862-202-3109
CONTACTSarah Moss
smoss@primepathmedtech.com281-795-1812

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026