Skip to content

Absolute vs Normalized Acceleration and Deceleration Load in Football Microcycles

Comparison of Absolute and Individualized Normalized Acceleration and Deceleration Thresholds Across the Football Microcycle

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07451041
Acronym
NORM-ACCDEC
Enrollment
27
Registered
2026-03-05
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
2025-07-31
Last updated
2026-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Athletic Performance, Soccer, Training Load Monitoring

Keywords

Soccer, External Load, GPS Monitoring, Acceleration, Deceleration, Microcycle, Normalization, Sports Science

Brief summary

This observational repeated-measures study investigates differences between absolute and individualized normalized acceleration and deceleration thresholds across the football microcycle. Match-derived locomotor metrics are commonly used to guide training prescription, although match performance may not reflect each player's maximal physical capacity. Therefore, this study monitored under-23 male football players across a full competitive season using 10-Hz GPS technology during training sessions and matches. High-intensity normalized thresholds were defined as 75-100% of individual maximum acceleration and deceleration, and were compared with conventional absolute thresholds (\>3 m/s² and \<-3 m/s²). The study aims to determine whether normalized approaches provide a more accurate representation of high-intensity locomotor demands across microcycle sessions relative to match load.

Detailed description

This season-long observational cohort study examined the distribution of acceleration and deceleration external load across the football microcycle using both absolute and individualized normalized thresholds. Twenty-seven under-23 male football players competing at the national level were monitored throughout one competitive season using 10-Hz GPS devices during all training sessions and official matches. Individual maximum acceleration and deceleration were determined using the average of the three highest values recorded across the season while excluding potential measurement artefacts. High-intensity normalized thresholds were defined as 75-100% of these individual maxima and compared with conventional absolute thresholds (\>3 m/s² and \<-3 m/s²). Outcome measures included counts and distances of acceleration and deceleration efforts across microcycle days relative to match load, adjusted for playing position. Generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate differences between threshold definitions and temporal patterns across the microcycle. The primary objective was to determine whether normalized thresholds provide a more sensitive and ecologically valid characterization of high-intensity locomotor demands compared with fixed absolute thresholds, with implications for training load monitoring and prescription in football.

Interventions

OTHERExternal Load Monitoring

Observational monitoring of locomotor demands using GPS technology during routine training sessions and matches. No experimental intervention was applied.

Sponsors

University of Maia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male under-23 outfield football players competing at national level and participating in regular training sessions and official matches with valid GPS data.

Exclusion criteria

* Goalkeepers, players with long-term injury preventing participation, or sessions with missing or invalid GPS data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Counts of High-Intensity Accelerations and Decelerations (Absolute vs Normalized Thresholds)Across one competitive season (approximately 10 months)Number of acceleration and deceleration efforts performed at high intensity using absolute thresholds (\>3 m/s² and \<-3 m/s²) and individualized normalized thresholds (75-100% of individual maximum) across microcycle sessions relative to match load.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Distance Covered in High-Intensity Accelerations and DecelerationsAcross one competitive season (approximately 10 months)Distance covered during high-intensity acceleration and deceleration efforts using absolute and normalized thresholds across microcycle sessions relative to match load.
Training-to-Match Load RatiosAcross one competitive season (approximately 10 months)Ratios comparing locomotor acceleration and deceleration demands between training sessions and matches across the microcycle.

Countries

Portugal

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRicado Lemos Pimenta, PhD

University of Maia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026