Skip to content

Evaluating Health Literacy, Expectations and Regrets in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery for Malignant Disease

Evaluating Health Literacy, Expectations and Regrets in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery for Malignant Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07450950
Enrollment
90
Registered
2026-03-05
Start date
2025-11-01
Completion date
2026-05-30
Last updated
2026-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Large Bowel/Sarcoma Resections, Surgery, Major Esophageal or Stomach, Surgery, Major Hepatic, Surgery, Major Pancreatic

Keywords

Health literacy, Patient expectations, Expectations, Decision, Regret, Quality of life, Major abdominal surgery, Pancreatic surgery, Hepatic surgery, Esophageal surgery, Gastric surgery, Prospective cohort study, Qualitative interviews, Patient satisfaction

Brief summary

Patients undergoing major abdominal surgery often have to make complex decisions about their treatment, where risks, benefits and possible complications must be considered. Limited health literacy and unmet expectations can make this process difficult and may increase the risk of regret after surgery, as well as feelings of not having received sufficient support or clear information. The aim of this study is to explore how well patients understand the information they receive before surgery, what expectations they have and how these expectations relate to their postoperative experiences. The study includes patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery, such as pancreatic, liver, esophageal, gastric, or large bowel surgery, at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet. Data will be collected before surgery, one month after discharge and again three months later.

Detailed description

Patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery often face complex treatment decisions that involve weighing potential benefits against significant risks, including postoperative complications and prolonged recovery. In such situations, adequate patient information, realistic expectations and sufficient health literacy may be essential for supporting informed decision-making. When patients feel insufficiently informed or experience a mismatch between their expectations and postoperative outcomes, this may contribute to decision regret and reduced quality of life. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between health literacy, preoperative information, patient expectations, and postoperative experiences in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. In particular, the study will examine how these factors relate to postoperative decision regret and health-related quality of life. This is a prospective observational cohort study conducted at the Department of Transplantation and Digestive Diseases at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery, including pancreatic, hepatic, esophageal, gastric, and major colorectal procedures, will be invited to participate. Data will be collected at baseline before surgery and at follow-up approximately one month and three months after surgery. Participants will complete validated questionnaires about health literacy, treatment expectations, perceived information received before surgery, anxiety and depression, decision regret and health-related quality of life. In addition, a subgroup of participants will be invited to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews to explore how their preoperative expectations correspond with their postoperative experiences. The study aims to improve understanding of how patient-related factors such as health literacy and expectations influence postoperative experiences and decision regret. The findings may contribute to a better understanding of factors associated with postoperative decision regret and patient-reported outcomes following major abdominal cancer surgery.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients \> 18 years undergoing elective surgical treatment. * Patients who can read and understand the Danish language.

Exclusion criteria

\- Patients who are cognitively disabled and cannot mentally cooperate with the study design, as assessed by the investigator. In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, patients have the right to withdraw from the study at any time for any reason

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative decision regrets1 month, and 3 monthsDecision regret will be measured using the Danish version of the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). The scale consists of 5 items assessing the degree of regret following the surgical decision. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, and the total score is transformed to a 0-100 scale, where 0 indicates no regret and 100 indicates high regret.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Preoperative anxiety and depressionBaselineAnxiety and depression will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The questionnaire contains 14 questions divided into two subgroups (anxiety and depression). Therefore there are 7 questions for each and is scored from 0 to 3 resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 21 for each subgroup. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety or depression.
Quality of informationPerioperativePatients' satisfaction with the information provided before surgery will be measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Information Module (EORTC QLQ-INFO25). The instrument assesses perceived information received about disease, medical tests, treatment, and other services. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction with information.
Patients' preoperative expectationsBaselinePatients' preoperative expectations evaluated by The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q). The questionnaire contains 15 questions where the patient can rate their expectations from 0 to 10. 0 indicates their expectations of no relief, no benefit or no improvement, whereas 10 represents the opposite.
Health literacyBaselineHealth literacy will be measured using the Brief Health Literacy Scale, which evaluates patients' ability to understand and use health-related information. Higher scores indicate higher levels of health literacy.
Fulfillment of patient expectations1 monthFulfillment of preoperative expectations will be explored 14-30 days after surgery using a short semi-structured interview. Patients will be asked to reflect on how their expectations compared to their actual postoperative experiences.
Health-related quality of lifeBaseline, 1 month, and 3 monthsHealth-related quality of life will be measured using EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), which includes five domains: mobility, personal care, activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each area has five response levels ranging from "no problems" to "extreme problems." In addition, patients will rate their overall health on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health). The patient will mark on the number indicating the self-evaluated health.

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

CONTACTAmalie W. H. Westergaard, Medical student
amalie.winding.hjortshoej.westergaard@regionh.dk+4560528807
CONTACTAnja E. Geisler, Dr.Med.Sc.
Anja.Edith.Geisler@regionh.dk+4523318446

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026