Skip to content

Assessment of the Feasibility of Frozen Embryo Transfers in a Natural Cycle Among Obese Compared to Non-Obese Patients

Assessment of the Feasibility of Frozen Embryo Transfers in a Natural Cycle Among Obese Compared to Non-Obese Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07450300
Acronym
NATEC
Enrollment
1831
Registered
2026-03-04
Start date
2022-11-01
Completion date
2026-01-31
Last updated
2026-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility, Female

Brief summary

This retrospective study included 1,831 single blastocyst frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles performed between November 1, 2022 and August 31, 2025. Three endometrial preparation protocols were used according to ovulatory status, cycle duration, and characteristics of previous FET cycles: modified natural cycle with ovulation trigger (mNC-FET) (n = 770), stimulated cycle FET (SC-FET) (n = 468), and hormone replacement therapy FET (HRT-FET) (n = 593). In natural cycles, if the predefined criteria for ovulation trigger were not met, the cycle was converted to a stimulated cycle. The aim of this study was to determine whether body mass index affects embryo transfer feasibility, reproductive outcomes, and cycle characteristics across different FET protocols.

Interventions

In the modified natural cycle group, patients underwent ultrasound and hormonal monitoring to track spontaneous follicular development. When the leading follicle reached an appropriate size and endometrial thickness was adequate, ovulation was triggered using human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to schedule frozen embryo transfer.

PROCEDURESubstitued cycle

In the stimulated cycle group, mild ovarian stimulation was performed using oral agents and/or low-dose gonadotropins to promote follicular development. Follicular growth was monitored by ultrasound, and ovulation was either triggered with hCG or occurred spontaneously, allowing scheduling of frozen embryo transfer.

In the hormone replacement therapy group, endometrial preparation was achieved through exogenous estrogen administration. Once adequate endometrial thickness was confirmed, progesterone supplementation was initiated to mimic the luteal phase and schedule frozen embryo transfer.

Sponsors

Clinique Mathilde
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Women aged ≥18 years at the time of frozen embryo transfer. Patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) with frozen embryo transfer (FET) using a natural, modified natural, stimulated, or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) protocol. Availability of body mass index (BMI) measurement prior to initiation of the treatment cycle.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
feasibility of embryo transferscheduled day of embryo transfer (Day 0 of planned FET cycle)Proportion of treatment cycles in which the planned frozen embryo transfer (FET) was performed as scheduled, regardless of the number of embryos transferred.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical pregnancy6 weeks after embryo transferPresence of an intrauterine gestational sac with fetal cardiac activity confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound.
Miscarriage rate12 weeks of gestationPregnancy loss occurring after confirmation of clinical pregnancy and before 12 completed weeks of gestation.
Cycle cancellation ratescheduled day of embryo transferProportion of initiated FET cycles in which embryo transfer was not performed due to inadequate endometrial development, ovulation disorder, premature luteinization, or other clinical reasons.
Conversion from natural to stimulated cyclestime of treatment protocol modification during the stimulation phase (prior to ovulation trigger)Proportion of cycles initially planned as natural or modified natural cycles that required initiation of ovarian stimulation due to insufficient follicular development or ovulatory dysfunction.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026