Functioanl Dyspepsia, Post Prandial Distress Syndrome
Conditions
Keywords
Functional Dyspepsia, Acotiamide, Itopride, Post-Prandial Distress Syndrome, Gastroprokinetic
Brief summary
This study is a randomized, double-blinded trial that will compare the effectiveness of two medications, acotiamide and itopride, in treating Functional Dyspepsia. Functional Dyspepsia causes uncomfortable symptoms arising from the gastro-duodenal region, such as fullness after meals, early satiation, stomach pain, and burning. The primary aim of this trial is to determine whether acotiamide is superior to itopride-specifically by a margin of 15%-at improving these meal-related digestive symptoms. Participants will be involved in the study for a total of 5 weeks. The study begins with a 7-day baseline period where participants will track their symptoms daily. Following the baseline period, participants will be randomly assigned to receive either 100mg of acotiamide three times a day or 50mg of itopride three times a day. The treatment phase will last for 4 weeks, during which participants will take the medication before meals on an empty stomach. Participants will continue to track their symptoms daily and will complete questionnaires about their overall treatment effect and quality of life at follow-up visits.
Detailed description
Functional Dyspepsia (FD) is defined as gastro-duodenal symptoms occurring without any underlying systemic or metabolic disease, affecting an estimated 8.4% of the global population. Both acotiamide and itopride are established, commercially available medications known to be efficacious in managing FD. However, there is currently no direct comparison between the two drugs to help establish a universally accepted standard of care. This study is designed as a single-center, randomized, double-blind superiority trial to be conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. The trial seeks to enroll 368 participants aged 18 to 70 who meet the ROME IV criteria for FD, specifically Postprandial Distress Syndrome (PDS). Methodology & Procedures: Baseline Phase: Participants will undergo a 7-day baseline period in which they will discontinue any current gastrointestinal medications to clear residual effects. Randomization & Blinding: Participants will be randomized via a computer-generated program in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment arms. To ensure double-blinding, the hospital pharmacy will encapsulate both acotiamide and itopride into identical opaque capsules, making them indistinguishable in taste, smell, and appearance. Intervention: The active treatment phase lasts 4 weeks. Group 1 will self-administer 100mg of oral acotiamide thrice daily before meals, while Group 2 will self-administer 50mg of oral itopride thrice daily before meals. Assessments: Symptom Severity Diary: Participants will record nine specific symptoms daily on a scale of 0-3 throughout the 5-week study duration. Overall Treatment Effect (OTE): At week 1 and week 4, participants will evaluate their symptom changes compared to baseline using a 7-point Likert scale. Quality of Life (QoL): The Short form of NPEAN dyspepsia index (SF-NDI) will be administered at the end of the baseline period (day 7) and at the end of the treatment period (week 4) to assess changes in disease-specific QoL. Safety Monitoring: Participants will be monitored for Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) at the week 1 and week 4 follow-up visits. All adverse events will be documented in case report forms and tracked by the Principal Investigator until resolution or stabilization, with SAEs being reported to the Ethical Review Committee.
Interventions
100mg thrice daily, before meals on an empty stomach for 4 weeks.
50mg thrice daily, before meals on an empty stomach for 4 weeks.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Following a 7-day baseline period, eligible participants will be randomized into two parallel treatment arms to receive either Acotiamide (100mg) or Itopride (50mg) three times a day for exactly 4 weeks.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients experiencing bothersome post-prandial fullness or bothersome early satiation at least three days a week. * Symptom onset must have occurred six months prior to diagnosis, and symptoms must have been present for at least the past three months. * No evidence of organic, systemic, or metabolic disease based on clinical investigations and endoscopy. * Patients with co-existing symptoms of Epigastric Pain Syndrome (EPS) are included only if the symptoms causing the most distress are meal-related. * Individuals who have already tested negative for H. pylori (separate tests will not be conducted for the study).
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with an identifiable organic disease that can explain their symptoms, such as peptic ulcer, GERD, or chronic pancreatitis. * Patients with a history of gastrointestinal surgery. * History of malignancy in the past five years. * Patients having major psychiatric or depressive disorders. * Patients with a history of drug or alcohol abuse. * Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. * Patients with uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c \>8). * Patients with uncontrolled hypertension. * Patients diagnosed with Irritable Bowel Syndrome. * Pregnant or lactating women. * Patients who have used antibiotics, opioids, or any other medication that -affects gastrointestinal function in the past 4 weeks. * H. pylori positive patients. * Patients who cannot fill out scales or record their symptoms.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| : Overall Treatment Effect (OTE) | Week 1 and Week 4. | The primary outcome is evaluated using the Overall Treatment Effect (OTE) questionnaire to determine if acotiamide is superior to itopride in improving symptoms of functional dyspepsia. Participants will be asked to compare their current symptoms to their baseline using a 7-point Likert scale. The scale ranges from a minimum value of 1, which denotes "extremely improved compared to baseline," to a maximum value of 7, which denotes "extremely aggravated compared to baseline". Therefore, higher scores on this scale indicate a worse outcome. Patients selecting options 1 through 3 on the OTE scale will be considered responders to the treatment, while those selecting 4 through 7 will be considered non-responders. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life: Assessing changes in the patient's disease-specific quality of life. | Recorded on day 7 (end of baseline) and at the end of week 4 | Quality of Life is assessed to measure changes in the patient's disease-specific quality of life. This is measured using the unabbreviated Short form of the Nepean Dyspepsia Index (SF-NDI). The SF-NDI evaluates 5 subscales: tension, daily activity, eating/drinking, knowledge/control, and work/study. The scale for this index ranges from a minimum value of 1 to a maximum value of 5. On this scale, a lower score indicates a better quality of life, meaning that a higher score represents a worse outcome. |
| Symptom Severity: Participants will evaluate the severity of 9 specific upper gastrointestinal symptoms | Throughout the 4-week period | Symptom severity is assessed by having participants evaluate 9 specific upper gastrointestinal symptoms: upper abdominal pain, post prandial fullness, upper abdominal discomfort, bloating, early satiation, excessive belching, nausea, vomiting, and heartburn. This is measured daily using the unabbreviated Symptom Severity Diary scale. The scale ranges from a minimum value of 0 to a maximum value of 3 for each individual symptom. On this scale, a higher score indicates greater symptom severity, meaning that a higher score represents a worse outcome. |
Contacts
Aga Khan University