Real-life Ecological Momentary Assessment of Lived Burden in Hereditary AngioEdema

Hereditary Angioedema With C1 Esterase Inhibitor Deficiency, Hereditary Angioedema - Type 1, Hereditary Angioedema - Type 2

Hereditary Angioedema, Burden of disease, Ecological Momentary Assessment, Quality of Life

The aim of this study is to conduct an in-depth analysis of the Burden of Disease (BoD) perceived by patients with Hereditary Angioedema (HAE), through daily prospective observations based on Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) via digital surveys and standardised questionnaires. Participants will answer online survey questions about their perceived burden of disease for 8 consecutive weeks. The main hypothesis is that daily prospective observation (EMA) will reveal a higher and more fluctuating burden of disease compared to traditional retrospective scales, providing a more accurate representation of the impact of HAE on patients' daily lives.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by recurrent attacks of non-pruritic edema, localized at the subcutaneous, submucosal, and visceral levels. These attacks, caused by a temporary and localized increase in vascular permeability mediated by bradykinin, can affect the skin, gastrointestinal tract, face, genitals, and upper airways, resulting in a risk of asphyxiation. The most common forms of HAE are Type 1 (85-90%), caused by a quantitative deficiency of C1-inhibitor (HAE-C1INH-Type1), and Type 2 (10-15%), due to a qualitative dysfunction of the same (HAE-C1INH-Type2). In Italy, the overall prevalence is estimated at approximately 1:65,000. HAE attacks occur unpredictably, with an average frequency that is highly heterogeneous between subjects, ranging on average from 1 to 26 episodes per year; some severe cases can reach 100 attacks per year. These manifestations have an average duration of about 2-5 days and are often debilitating, significantly compromising quality of life (QoL) and the subject's functional abilities. The impact of the disease is not limited to the presence, duration, or frequency of attacks but persists during intercritical periods, often accompanied by anticipatory anxiety and a constant sense of vulnerability, which can lead to a state of hypervigilance. Numerous studies describe the Burden of Disease (BoD) as multidimensional. The impact on QoL concerns physical, psychological, social, and professional dimensions. From a psychological and emotional perspective, many HAE patients report high levels of stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms, often linked to the unpredictability of attacks and the perception of poor control over their condition. Furthermore, despite therapeutic progress, the potential risk of fatal laryngeal edema remains a significant source of concern for many patients, contributing to a persistent emotional burden. At the professional level, a reduction in productivity is observed due to both absenteeism and presenteeism, with European studies documenting an average of up to 20 days lost per year between school and work. Finally, on a social level, some patients report experiences of stigmatization or discrimination, with a negative impact on relational well-being and social integration. Until now, BoD in HAE has been assessed primarily through retrospective questionnaires and standardized measures administered at single time points, such as the Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL), the Angioedema Activity Score (AAS), or the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: General Health (WPAI:GH). While validated and widely used, these instruments present several methodological limitations. In particular, they rely on subjective estimates reported within more or less broad time windows (e.g., the last two weeks or the previous month) and are therefore susceptible to recall bias, the mnemonic distortion in the reconstruction of past experiences. Moreover, these tools are developed to provide a static snapshot of subjective BoD, which may fail to capture the dynamic trends and the intra- and inter-individual fluctuations typical of the HAE experience, especially concerning emotional, social, or symptomatic events occurring in daily life. In light of these considerations, this study will apply the Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) method. This is an innovative observational data collection method that allows for the repeated collection of self-report data over time through brief questionnaires sent to the participant's smartphone at specific and/or random moments of the day. EMAs are based on simple, intuitive, and quick items, similar to those found in traditional psychometric tools, but administered multiple times over time and within the context of the patient's real life. This approach offers a twofold advantage: 1. It reduces recall bias, as the person is prompted to respond in real-time or in close temporal proximity to the experience. 2. It allows for the collection of data with high ecological validity, meaning data that is relevant to the subject's behavior and experience in their natural environment. This allows for a more precise exploration of the characteristics that constitute BoD in HAE and, consequently, the daily impact of the disease. The present protocol aims to analyze in depth the Burden of Disease (BoD) perceived by HAE patients through daily and prospective observation based on EMAs and standardized scales.

No related papers found yet.

Papers published before 2007-09-01 may not appear yet. Historical indexing is in progress.

Italy