Skip to content

Functional Outcomes After LumbOpenitoneal Shunt Placement UndeR Local Anesthesia for Patients With Idiopathic Normal preSsure Hydrocephalus (FLOURISH) Trial

Functional Outcomes After Lumbopenitoneal Shunt Placement Under Local Anesthesia for Patients With Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Trial

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07447479
Acronym
FLOURISH
Enrollment
0
Registered
2026-03-03
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2031-03-31
Last updated
2026-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH)

Brief summary

This study is a prospective observational registry study that enrolls all patients aged 60 years or older suspected of having idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus based on the Third Edition of the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. From the cohort registered, patients judged to be candidates for surgery based on the 3rd Edition of the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. These patients will be randomized 1:1 to undergo either ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery under general anesthesia or lumbar peritoneal shunt surgery under local anesthesia. A randomized clinical trial would attest the non-inferiority of lumbar peritoneal shunt surgery under local anesthesia compared to ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery under general anesthesia regarding the improvement in timed up-and-go test scores at 3 months post-surgery relative to pre-surgery levels.

Interventions

PROCEDUREventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery under general anesthesia

ventriculoperitoneal shunt procedure was performed via right posterior horn puncture under general anesthesia

PROCEDURElumbar-peritoneal shunt procedure under local anesthesia

Pentazocine and midazolam are administered intravenously to induce conscious sedation, and a lumbar-peritoneal shunt procedure is performed using local infiltration anesthesia with 1% lidocaine.

Sponsors

Institute for Clinical Effectiveness, Japan
Lead SponsorOTHER
Nadogaya Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Probable iNPH patients * Age 60 years or older at the time of the tap test * Patients capable of performing the Timed Up and Go test * Patients assignable within 2 weeks (14 days) of obtaining RCT consent * Patients capable of undergoing shunt surgery within 1 month (30 days) of assignment * Patients capable of follow-up at the assigned facility or referring facility for 12 months after assignment * Patients for whom informed consent was obtained

Exclusion criteria

* Patients deemed unsuitable for lumbar-abdominal shunt surgery due to advanced degeneration of the lumbar spine and spinal canal, etc. * Patients deemed unsuitable for abdominal shunt surgery due to a history of multiple open abdominal surgeries, a history of severe intra-abdominal infection, etc. * Other patients deemed unsuitable by the attending physician

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in timed up and go test score3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist score24 hours0-8 scale (0 best and 8 worst)
10% or greater improvement in the timed up and go score3 months
Change in timed up and go score1 month
Change in average walking speed measured by the 10-meter walk test3 months
Change in Tinetti scale score3 monthsTinetti scale score is 0-28 scale (28 best and 0 worst)
Change in modified Rankin Scale score3 monthsmodified Rankin Scale score 0-6 (0 completely independent and 6 death)
Change in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire score3 monthOveractive Bladder Questionnaire score has two components of Symptom Bother Scale and HRQoL Scale. Symptom Bother Scale: The 8 items are scored from 1 ("Not at all") to 6 ("A very great deal"). The scores are then summed to produce a total score ranging from 8 to 48, where higher scores indicate greater symptom bother. HRQoL Scale: The 25 items are scored from 1 ("All of the time" / "Extremely") to 6 ("None of the time" / "Not at all"). Importantly, these items are reverse-scored before being summed. The total and subscale scores are then transformed to a 0-100 scale. On this scale, higher scores reflect a better health-related quality of life.
Change in Mini-Mental State Exam scores3 monthsMini-Mental State Exam scores ranges 0-30 (30 best and 0 worst)
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment--Japanese Version scores3 monthsMontreal Cognitive Assessment--Japanese Version scores ranges 0-30 (30 best and 0 worst)
Change in 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L)3 months0-1 (0 worst and 1 best quality of life)
Change in 5-level EuroQoL 5D (VAS)3 months0-100 (0 worst and 100 best quality of life)
Days from surgery to discharge3 months
Days of ambulation after surgery7 days

Countries

Japan

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRTakeshi Morimoto, MD, PhD, MPH

Hyogo Medical University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 22, 2026