Skip to content

Use of the Methoxyflurane as Pain-killer in the Prehospital Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Use of the Methoxyflurane as Pain-killer in the Prehospital Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07445737
Acronym
MAMI
Enrollment
700
Registered
2026-03-03
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2029-06-01
Last updated
2026-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

chest pain, morphine, methoxyflurane

Brief summary

* Chest pain is the main symptom of acute myocardial infarction. A precocious analgesic treatment is justified by patient's comfort and unfavorable hemodynamic consequences of persistent pain. Morphine is the painkiller historically prescribed in this situation. Morphine has never been evaluated vs placebo and is strongly suspected to decrease oral anti-platelet efficacy. Then, morphine has been downgraded, in the 2017 European guidelines (European Society of Cardiology - ESC) from I to IIa. To find alternative treatment is required. * The methoxyflurane is an anesthetic gas used in emergency setting for about twenty years. It is now commonly used in France. Its analgesic properties have been demonstrated. Its main advantages are its maneuverability as it is delivered by inhalation, i.e. without (before) any venous access and self-administered by the patient. Tolerability is good. It could be an excellent alternative to morphine.

Interventions

Patient's self-administration of methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) with dedicated inhaler Initial dose: 3 mL (1 vial). A second 3 mL dose can be used. Treatment: from inclusion to hospital arrival.

DRUGMorphine

Morphine intra-venous infusion: 3 mg bolus repeated every 5 minutes until obtaining VAS ≤ 3. Treatment: from inclusion to hospital arrival

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER
Medical Developments International Limited
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient age ≥ 18 years * Patient managed in pre-hospital setting for a ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) : Chest pain \< 12 hours with moderate to severe pain (VAS \> 6/10) or STEMI on ECG according to 2017 ESC guidelines

Exclusion criteria

* Previous analgesic treatment for this episode of chest pain * Hypersensitivity to morphine, methoxyflurane, any fluorinated anesthetic or any of the excipients listed in SmPC, * Decompensated respiratory failure (in the absence of artificial ventilation), * Severe hepatocellular insufficiency (with encephalopathy), * Acute head trauma and intracranial hypertension in the absence of controlled ventilation, * Uncontrolled epilepsy, * Treatment with buprenorphine, nalbuphine and pentazocine, naltrexone, nalmefene or sodium oxybate, * Breastfeeding, in case of initiation or continuation after birth of a long-term treatment. * Known malignant hyperthermia or genetic predisposition of the patient. * History of serious adverse effects of the patient or his family after administration of inhaled anesthetics. * History of signs of liver damage after use of methoxyflurane or after anesthesia with a halogenated hydrocarbon. * Clinically significant renal impairment. * Known renal failure with creatinine clearance below 30 ml/min or undergoing extracorporeal renal replacement therapy. * Altered level of consciousness due to any cause, including head trauma, drug or alcohol use. * Clinical evidence of cardiovascular instability (PAS \<90 mm Hg). * Clinical evidence of respiratory depression. * Incapacity to self-assess pain intensity * Incapacity to methoxyflurane self-administration * Known pregnancy, breastfeeding, minors or incapacity (curatorship or guardianship) * Participation in another interventional study involving human participants or being in the exclusion period at the end of a previous study involving human participants * Absence of a Social Security

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Demonstrate that methoxyflurane self-administered by the patient is at least as efficient in achieving pain relief that morphineat 30 minutesTo demonstrate that methoxyflurane self-administered by the patient suffering chest pain related to an acute myocardial infarction is at least as efficient in achieving pain relief that morphine with better tolerance (achieving pain relief, i.e. pain intensity score on visual analogic scale (VAS) ≤ 3 at 30 minutes)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare the impact of the treatments on heart rateat 30 minutesImpact of the treatments on cardiovascular system: heart rate (data collected every 5 minutes until to 30 minutes after randomisation and at hospital arrival)
Compare the impact of the treatments on arterial blood pressureat 30 minutesImpact of the treatments on cardiovascular system: arterial blood pressure (data collected every 5 minutes until to 30 minutes after randomisation and at hospital arrival)
Compare the impact of the treatments on pulse oximetryat 30 minutesImpact of the treatments on cardiovascular system: pulse oximetry (data collected every 5 minutes until to 30 minutes after randomisation and at hospital arrival)
Compare the impact of the treatments on ECGat 30 minutesImpact of the treatments on cardiovascular system: ECG changes before discharge from the ambulance
Compare tolerance of the treatments on respiratory depressionat 30 minutesTolerance of the treatments: respiratory depression: respiratory rate \< 10 cycles per minutes (data collected every 5 minutes until to 30 minutes after randomisation and at hospital arrival)
Compare tolerance of the treatments on sedationat 30 minutesTolerance of the treatments: sedation: Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) ≥ 2 or ≤ -2 (data collected every 5 minutes until to 30 minutes after randomisation and at hospital arrival)
Compare tolerance of the treatments on dizziness, pruritus, nausea, vomiting, headacheat 30 minutesTolerance of the treatments: dizziness, pruritus, nausea, vomiting, headache (data collected every 5 minutes until to 30 minutes after randomisation and at hospital arrival)
Compare the impact of the treatments on pain reliefFrom randomization until the first documented pain divided by two, assessed up to 30 minutesTime before achieving pain relief, i.e. time to reach initial pain divided by two (initial VAS / 2)

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTFrederic LAPOSTOLLE, MD,PHD
frederic.lapostolle@aphp.fr01 48 96 44 54
CONTACTFrederic ADNET, MD,PHD
frederic.adnet@aphp.fr01 48 96 44 54

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026