Skip to content

Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis

Effect of Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Patients With Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Double Blinded Randomised Placebo Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07441824
Acronym
PERiANP
Enrollment
140
Registered
2026-03-02
Start date
2026-04-10
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2026-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency

Keywords

acute pancreatitis, pancrearic exocrine insufficiency, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy

Brief summary

In this multicenter, double blinded, placebo-controlled, 1:1 parallel group RCT, the investigators propose to evaluate the impact of pancreatic exocrine replacement therapy on patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). The investigators will include patients of 18-60yrs age and both genders with \>50% pancreatic parenchymal necrosis and at least 5% loss of body weight. The primary outcome measure is percent change in body weight at 3 months after enrolment. The intervention will include pancreatic enzyme consisting of 25000 IU of lipase and similar appearing placebo.

Detailed description

Acute pancreatitis (AP), an inflammatory disorder of the pancreas, is mild and self-limiting in most patients. Around 10-20% of AP patients develop acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) which is characterized by destruction of both pancreatic and peripancreatic tissue and is associated with high rate of morbidity and mortality due to both local and systemic complications. Early recognition and close monitoring of affected patients is crucial. Treatment consists of goal-directed intravenous fluid resuscitation, pain control, and enteral nutrition as early as possible. While sterile necrosis might resolve with above conservative measures, infected necrosis requires antibiotics and further interventions such as percutaneous drainage, minimally invasive surgeries, and endoscopic necrosectomy. In ANP patients there is direct destruction of acinar tissue that results in pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI). In PEI there is insufficient secretion of pancreatic enzymes that causes inadequate nutrient digestion and absorption resulting in weight loss, malnutrition, metabolic bone disease and fat-soluble vitamins and mineral deficiencies. The risk of PEI after ANP is about 25% over 3 years. According to two meta-analysis, PEI was found to be more prevalent during the index AP episode and it remained persistent in about half of the study population at follow-ups. They also reported that the risk of developing PEI is more in those with alcoholic etiology and severe and necrotizing pancreatitis. Hence, management of PEI following ANP is important to improve nutritional status and quality of life. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is the mainstay of treatment for PEI. While the use of PERT is well-established in chronic pancreatitis, its efficacy in patients with ANP is still unclear. Hence, in this study, the investigators aim to provide insights into the potential benefits of enzyme supplementation in patients with ANP by evaluating nutritional status, clinical outcomes, and quality of life. This is a multicenter, double blinded, placebo-controlled, 1:1 parallel group RCT, the investigators propose to evaluate the impact of pancreatic exocrine replacement therapy on patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). The investigators will include patients of 18-60yrs age and both genders with \>50% pancreatic parenchymal necrosis and at least 5% loss of body weight. The primary outcome measure is percent change in body weight at 3 months after enrolment. The intervention will include pancreatic enzyme consisting of 25000 IU of lipase and similar appearing placebo.

Interventions

DRUGPancreatic enzyme capsules

Enteric coated pancreatic enzyme

DRUGPlacebo

Similar appearing glucose capsules

Sponsors

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with AP according to the Revised Atlanta Classification diagnostic criteria * Index episode of acute pancreatitis with more than 50% pancreatic parenchymal necrosis and at least 5% loss of pre pancreatitis body weight at the time of screening * Within 6 weeks of onset of disease * Able to take food orally * Age 18-60 years * Both genders

Exclusion criteria

* Underlying chronic pancreatitis * Recurrent acute pancreatitis * Pancreatic cancer * Patients being discharged with NJ tubes * Pregnancy and lactation * Inability to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent change in body weight3 monthsBody weight (in kg) will be measured at baseline and again at 3 months follow-up, and the difference between the two time points will be used to assess the effect of the intervention on patients' weight status. The change will be expressed as percent change of weight 3 months compared to baseline weight.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in quality of life3 monthsQuality of life will be assessed by the Short Form (SF)-36 tool. This is a standardised and validated questionnaire based scoring tool that contains 36 questions dealing with 8 domains of quality of life. The lowest score in this tool is 0 and the highest score is 100, a higher score indicating better quality of life.
Change in pancreatic exocrine function3 monthsExocrine function will be assessed by the Fecal elastase test and will be expressed as microgram of elastase per gram of stool. Higher value indicates better exocrine function. The cut-off value that will be used is 200mcg/gm elastase, below which exocrine insufficiency will be considered to be present.
Change in nutritional status: Subjective Global Assesment (SGA)3 monthsThis is a semiquantitative questionnaire based nutritional assessment tool which classifies the nutritional status as SGA A (normal nutrition), SGA B (mild/moderate malnutrition) and SGC C (severe malnutrition)
Change in nuritional status: Anthropometry3 monthsSkin fold thickness (in mm) over the triceps muscle at the mid arm level.
Change in nutritional change: Anthropometry3 monthsMid-arm circumference (MAC) in cm.
Change in nutritional status: Anthropometry3 monthsMid-upper arm muscle circumference (MAMC) in cm.
Change in nutritional status: Anthropomentry3 monthsMid-arm muscle area (MAMA) in cm square.
Change in nutritional status: Biochemical assessment3 monthsHemoglobin in gm/dL
Change in the endocrine status3 monthsFasting blood glucose (FBS)
Change in patient's impression of change after treatment3 monthsThis will be evaluated using the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC). The score ranges from 1-7, with a score of 1 indicating very much improved and 7 indicating very much worse
Readmission after onset of treatment3 monthsReadmission to hospital

Countries

India

Contacts

CONTACTAbdul Rasheed, PharmD
abdulrasheedmd1223@gmail.com+919652104726
STUDY_DIRECTORRupjyoti Talukdar, MD

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospitals

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 6, 2026