Skip to content

Comparison of Root Canal Desinfection Protocols

Comparison of Different Root Canal Disinfection Protocols for Bacterial Reduction in Teeth With Apical Periodontitis Using Two Analytical Microbiological Methods: a Randomized Clinical Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07439614
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-02-27
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2026-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periapical Periodontitis

Brief summary

Evaluate and compare the disinfecting efficacy of two supplementary antimicrobial protocols in teeth with apical periodontitis

Detailed description

This study aims to evaluate and compare the disinfecting efficacy of two supplementary antimicrobial protocols in teeth with apical periodontitis: Er,Cr:YSGG laser activated irrigation and ultrasonic activation using a piezoelectric ultrasonic device (Dentsply International Inc., York, PA, USA) and Irrisafe tip (Satelec/Acteon, Merignac, France), comparing the detection of bacteria before and after instrumentation. Secondary aims are to assess presence of bacteria before and after chemomechanical preparation using two microbiological methods: * ATP level analysis using the Endocator device * Quantitative PCR (qPCR) for total bacterial quantification.

Interventions

DEVICEDesinfection device

Desinfection protocol with (LAI): Er,Cr:YSGG laser (2780 nm) delivered with a radial-firing tip.

DEVICEAnalytical microbiological methods

Endocator: Measures ATP levels (Endoscore and RLU) to rapidly assess bacterial load in less than one minute.

Sponsors

State University of New York at Buffalo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a parallel-group interventional study in which participants are allocated to different treatment arms according to the intervention received (laser or ultrasound), following standardized clinical protocols.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients able to give informed consent and willing/able to comply with study procedures and follow-up. * Molar teeth indicated for endodontic treatment. * Teeth with intact pulp-chamber walls (no extensive coronal destruction). * Necrotic pulp confirmed by pulp testing. * Clinical and radiographic evidence of asymptomatic apical periodontitis.

Exclusion criteria

* Immature teeth * Teeth with calcified or obliterated canals * Teeth with extensive coronal destruction * Teeth with previous endodontic treatment * Symptomatic apical periodontitis * Teeth with periodontal pockets greater than 4 mm * Patients who have received systemic antibiotics in the last 3 months * Patients with a history of diabetes or immune impairment * Pregnant patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduction of bacteria in the root canal systemImmediately after the irrigation activation procedure, ATP levels will be measured, and qPCR analysis will be performed at the end of the study, once all samples have been collected.Evaluation of the effectiveness of different irrigation activation devices by assessing bacterial reduction in the root canal system. ATP levels will be measured (Endoscore and RLU values) to provide a rapid assessment of bacterial load in less than one minute. Subsequently, bacterial reduction will be confirmed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTStephen Lyon, DDS
smlyon@buffalo.edu(716) 829-6229
CONTACTThamyres Monteiro, MSc
thamyres@buffalo.edu(716) 829-6199

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 24, 2026